Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Death Penalty Criminal Justice - 1,913 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Let us suppose that killing as a form of punishment is a moral and universally accepted practice. Would it then be acceptable to issue this irreparable sanction to a select few while allowing others, equally accountable, to avoid it? It is acceptable to our criminal justice system for it seems to be standard operating procedure. Many embrace the death penalty based on the eye for an eye concept. There is certainly some merit to this argument and it seems quite fair and logical. Unfortunately our use of the death penalty is neither fair nor logical.

Our criminal justice systems lip service to the age-old concept is an insulting disguise for such an obscurity of fairness and logic. The death penalty is frivolous and discriminatory in its procedure because of the unreasonable prices we pay to execute certain groups at much higher rates than others. We pay different prices for using a death penalty. Sadly, today more than ever, the dollar seems to be the endlessly interchangeable standard of value.

We strive to make money, save money and when we spend money we do so with a valued return in mind. Accordingly, a popular argument contends that we spend too much money incarcerating prisoners for life. We probably do but the price tag on issuing a death sentence according to a Florida study is $ 3. 1 million compared to $ 1 million for a life sentence; a 3100 % difference (Walker 1994, 108). Imagine your death being valued at $ 3. 1 million how flattering. Based on these figures, the difference in the price of an execution and the price of life behind bars is enough to feed 7, 200 starving children for ten years. The price of an execution is amazing.

Naturally, for such a price, we should consider our valued return. In return for an execution we receive utter incapacitation; an essential return indeed but we get the same from a life sentence at a fraction of the cost. What else do we get? Perhaps we satisfy a need for revenge. Perhaps we feel that we need to keep revenge alive at any price. After all, we pay top dollar for it.

So who exactly is the target of our vengeance and why? From 1930 to 1980 executions for whites numbered 1754 compared to 2066 for blacks (Bedau 1982). In 1978 blacks claimed 4888 murder victims. Of these, 536 were white or 12 % (Bedau 1982).

About half the death row population was black and 85 % of their victims were white (Bedau 1982). Blacks who kill whites have a 25 % chance of receiving the death penalty while whites have a 0 % chance of receiving it for killing a black. For a black person, killing a white person could be deadly. Our criminal justice systems use of the death penalty appears increasingly void of rationale when we consider the other prices we pay. Executions take up to fifteen years or longer (Walker 1994, 106).

We not only pay for executions but incarceration as well! There is also the ultimate price. In the wake of the criminal justice systems quest to lethally condemn a specific offender, some innocently accused are gassed, hanged and electrocuted in the name of retribution. There are twenty-three known cases of the innocent being put to death by the state (Walker 1994, 106).

Oops. The process of the death penalty is not only frivolous. It is reckless as well. The criminal justice system is discriminatory in its use of the death penalty.

If the overwhelming bias in the process of the death penalty isnt convincing then perhaps the phenomenal expenditures are. Either way we look we find a gross absurdity. The funding of the death penalty is frivolous, its fairness is unrealistic and its process as a whole is unconscionable Let us suppose that killing as a form of punishment is a moral and universally accepted practice. Would it then be acceptable to issue this irreparable sanction to a select few while allowing others, equally accountable, to avoid it? It is acceptable to our criminal justice system for it seems to be standard operating procedure. Many embrace the death penalty based on the eye for an eye concept.

There is certainly some merit to this argument and it seems quite fair and logical. Unfortunately our use of the death penalty is neither fair nor logical. Our criminal justice systems lip service to the age-old concept is an insulting disguise for such an obscurity of fairness and logic. The death penalty is frivolous and discriminatory in its procedure because of the unreasonable prices we pay to execute certain groups at much higher rates than others.

We pay different prices for using a death penalty. Sadly, today more than ever, the dollar seems to be the endlessly interchangeable standard of value. We strive to make money, save money and when we spend money we do so with a valued return in mind. Accordingly, a popular argument contends that we spend too much money incarcerating prisoners for life.

We probably do but the price tag on issuing a death sentence according to a Florida study is $ 3. 1 million compared to $ 1 million for a life sentence; a 3100 % difference (Walker 1994, 108). Imagine your death being valued at $ 3. 1 million how flattering. Based on these figures, the difference in the price of an execution and the price of life behind bars is enough to feed 7, 200 starving children for ten years. The price of an execution is amazing. Naturally, for such a price, we should consider our valued return. In return for an execution we receive utter incapacitation; an essential return indeed but we get the same from a life sentence at a fraction of the cost.

What else do we get? Perhaps we satisfy a need for revenge. Perhaps we feel that we need to keep revenge alive at any price. After all, we pay top dollar for it. So who exactly is the target of our vengeance and why? From 1930 to 1980 executions for whites numbered 1754 compared to 2066 for blacks (Bedau 1982).

In 1978 blacks claimed 4888 murder victims. Of these, 536 were white or 12 % (Bedau 1982). About half the death row population was black and 85 % of their victims were white (Bedau 1982). Blacks who kill whites have a 25 % chance of receiving the death penalty while whites have a 0 % chance of receiving it for killing a black. For a black person, killing a white person could be deadly. Our criminal justice systems use of the death penalty appears increasingly void of rationale when we consider the other prices we pay.

Executions take up to fifteen years or longer (Walker 1994, 106). We not only pay for executions but incarceration as well! There is also the ultimate price. In the wake of the criminal justice systems quest to lethally condemn a specific offender, some innocently accused are gassed, hanged and electrocuted in the name of retribution. There are twenty-three known cases of the innocent being put to death by the state (Walker 1994, 106). Oops.

The process of the death penalty is not only frivolous. It is reckless as well. The criminal justice system is discriminatory in its use of the death penalty. If the overwhelming bias in the process of the death penalty isnt convincing then perhaps the phenomenal expenditures are. Either way we look we find a gross absurdity.

The funding of the death penalty is frivolous, its fairness is unrealistic and its process as a whole is unconscionable Let us suppose that killing as a form of punishment is a moral and universally accepted practice. Would it then be acceptable to issue this irreparable sanction to a select few while allowing others, equally accountable, to avoid it? It is acceptable to our criminal justice system for it seems to be standard operating procedure. Many embrace the death penalty based on the eye for an eye concept. There is certainly some merit to this argument and it seems quite fair and logical.

Unfortunately our use of the death penalty is neither fair nor logical. Our criminal justice systems lip service to the age-old concept is an insulting disguise for such an obscurity of fairness and logic. The death penalty is frivolous and discriminatory in its procedure because of the unreasonable prices we pay to execute certain groups at much higher rates than others. We pay different prices for using a death penalty. Sadly, today more than ever, the dollar seems to be the endlessly interchangeable standard of value.

We strive to make money, save money and when we spend money we do so with a valued return in mind. Accordingly, a popular argument contends that we spend too much money incarcerating prisoners for life. We probably do but the price tag on issuing a death sentence according to a Florida study is $ 3. 1 million compared to $ 1 million for a life sentence; a 3100 % difference (Walker 1994, 108). Imagine your death being valued at $ 3. 1 million how flattering. Based on these figures, the difference in the price of an execution and the price of life behind bars is enough to feed 7, 200 starving children for ten years. The price of an execution is amazing.

Naturally, for such a price, we should consider our valued return. In return for an execution we receive utter incapacitation; an essential return indeed but we get the same from a life sentence at a fraction of the cost. What else do we get? Perhaps we satisfy a need for revenge. Perhaps we feel that we need to keep revenge alive at any price. After all, we pay top dollar for it.

So who exactly is the target of our vengeance and why? From 1930 to 1980 executions for whites numbered 1754 compared to 2066 for blacks (Bedau 1982). In 1978 blacks claimed 4888 murder victims. Of these, 536 were white or 12 % (Bedau 1982). About half the death row population was black and 85 % of their victims were white (Bedau 1982). Blacks who kill whites have a 25 % chance of receiving the death penalty while whites have a 0 % chance of receiving it for killing a black.

For a black person, killing a white person could be deadly. Our criminal justice systems use of the death penalty appears increasingly void of rationale when we consider the other prices we pay. Executions take up to fifteen years or longer (Walker 1994, 106). We not only pay for executions but incarceration as well! There is also the ultimate price. In the wake of the criminal justice systems quest to lethally condemn a specific offender, some innocently accused are gassed, hanged and electrocuted in the name of retribution.

There are twenty-three known cases of the innocent being put to death by the state (Walker 1994, 106). Oops. The process of the death penalty is not only frivolous. It is reckless as well. The criminal justice system is discriminatory in its use of the death penalty. If the overwhelming bias in the process of the death penalty isnt convincing then perhaps the phenomenal expenditures are.

Either way we look we find a gross absurdity. The funding of the death penalty is frivolous, its fairness is unrealistic and its process as a whole is unconscionable. 32 c


Free research essays on topics related to: criminal justice, death sentence, death penalty, justice systems, death row

Research essay sample on Death Penalty Criminal Justice

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com