NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
What characterizes the animal rights movement as "many hands on many oars?" The best example I can think of that would characterize the animal rights movement as 'many hands on many oars?' is portrayed by the list found at the web page address: web /arrives. html. This page lists link to approximately 250 other web sites concerning animal rights. Everything from the Animal Rights Advocates of Western New York to Zoocheck Canada can be found in this list.
To compare the 'many hands on many oars' analogy more precisely, the 'many hands' would be all the different regional groups in the web page's list such as the Animal Rights Advocates of Western New York. This group is just one of the over 10, 000 'hands' found today. The 'many oars' would be the different issues that each group focuses on and the tactics they employ to accomplish their goals. An example for this is Zoocheck Canada, which is a national charity in Canada that deals with the issues of animals in captivity. Zoocheck Canada attempts to accomplish their missions through investigation and research into zoo, circuses, and aquariums. They also sponsor fundraising events and educational programs to promote their mission.
The early 1980 's can be pinpointed as the point where everybody jumped on board and picked up an oar. Monumental works such as Singer's Animal Liberation inspired many different kinds of people. As the movement progressed, these people realized the need to pool their resources and work together to 'row their boat. ' One of the first people to recognize this was Alex Hershaft. Hershaft was a leader in the vegetarian movement in the mid 1970 s, which was not concerned with animal rights at the time. Hershaft wanted to see what would be the outcome if the resources of the vegetarian movement were intertwined with the spark of the upcoming animal right activist's enthusiasm. The outcome revealed the "Action for Life" conference at Cedarcrest College in Pennsylvania.
Many organizations were formed as a result of this conference. Among those new organizations were the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Farm Animal Reform Movement (FARM), and Trans-Species Unlimited. In my personal opinion, I believe that a conference such as this was required to start the animal rights movement going strong; however, I also think that this conference was self-defeating because they ended up splitting into different organizations. Hence the old saying, "Divided we fall. " The "Action for Life" conferences played a major role in the initial stages of the animal rights movement.
They also contributed to the analogy of many hands on many oars. This is because of wide variety of people that they attracted, each with their own beliefs and their own ideas on how to fight for animal rights. Put in descriptions of examples of different kinds of organizations? The animal rights movement is one of a number of liberation movements (feminism, civil rights, etc. ). Using that analogy are the goals of animal liberation unrelated to or at odds with those movements? The issue this question addresses involves a large amount of perspective.
The fact that 70 percent of animal rights activists are women indicates that animal liberation is at least related to the feminist movement. Although this could also indicate that social issues such as this are much more geared towards evoking emotional feelings, and hence women are more susceptible. However, even though I believe that woman can be more emotionally susceptible, I deny the validity of that statement because I have no facts to back it up. In reading Finsen's' book, The Animal Rights Movement in America, I found no such disclaimer stating where their facts ended and their opinion began.
Taking this into consideration, I am beginning to find it extremely difficult to be impartial when reading any material dealing with animal rights. However, given the question at hand, it seems that the Finsen's did approach the answer correctly. I believe that each movement either relates to or is at odds with the animal rights movement at different degrees and therefore you have to address each comparison separately. Feminism seems to have one of the greatest links with the animal rights movement.
In my research, I was able to locate an animal rights web page that was sponsored solely by feminists. The Feminists for Animal Rights (FAR) web page can be found at web and states who they are, what they do, and why animal liberation is associated with the feminist movement. According to FAR, women feel that they are as oppressed by patriarchal society as much as animals are. The supply many analogies such as how both women and animals are considered "cute" or referred to as foxes, dogs, cows, etc. Given this evidences, it seems that feminism is one movement that is largely involved in the animal rights movement. Environmentalists are a group of a slightly different nature.
Given the wide variety of environmentalist, they could be either at odds with or associated with the animal rights movement. The Finsen's stated that the conservationist view was the dominating label of environmentalists. Conservation is defined as preserving and protecting ecosystems. The Finsen's argue that conservationism is not genuinely environmentally ethical because it preserves some animals at the expense of others. I am opposed to their opinion here because it is relatively easy to criticize conservationists by falsely stating that their primary motive is that of providing game for hunting. If the Finsen's were to follow through with their argument against conservation, then wouldn't they also have to take up the belief of moral extensions to all living things?
Instead the Finsen's answer to this question is: 'After all, you have to eat something. ' In my opinion, the quote from Finsen's book demonstrates how all the social movements are related. The relation is revolved around opinion and a conglomerate of philosophical ideals. I do not think that we have the correct resolutions to any social movements yet because the human brain is currently incapable of deciphering all the variables involved within a society in order to develop the right solution. The reason behind all the differences in opinion is because different individuals have a higher degree of responsiveness to different variables, consequently creating differences in views. I think this question of the relation between movements is an excellent though provoking question that can help an individual gain an insight to the different mainstream event in our society today. However, there is no definite answer simply due to the nature of social movements.
Social movements have no foundation of facts, instead their foundations are built on beliefs, opinions, and emotions. Add the point that there is no other movement that supports animals rights wholly and completely Also show the conservative mission statement from the web page if it is supportive. Bibliography:
Free research essays on topics related to: animal liberation, animal rights movement, wide variety, feminist movement, social movements
Research essay sample on Animal Rights Movement Animal Liberation
