NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... that are used in the games come from logic. As one learns each sports sign: he or she starts to understand what the term means conceptually. Then one has to produce the sign from the picture in the sports sign dictionary. There are some categories that help participants on the way of learning the signs. The hand signals and gestures made by basketball referees are really a form of sign language.
Basketball is very demonstrative, says Coach Flanagan. That makes it pretty easy to sign. For a jump ball, the ref puts his fingers down on his hand and its pretty universal what that means. Dribble is pretty simple, pass is pretty simple. If you think about what referees do, a lot of its really sign language. (1) initialized - defense: D-DEFEND+, offense: O-DEFENSE+. (2) (Hearing) hand signal - walking: [S] hands rotate over one another, offensive foul: [ 5 ] clasps back of head. (3) conceptual - court: FLOOR. (4) letter - defense: "D", offense: "O." (5) abbreviation - quarter: Q-T, overtime: O-T. (6) body classifiers use the whole body to show actions like struggling to open a window, grabbing a hold of a person by the lapels, or putting hands on hips to show displeasure. (5).
Talking about the problems and limitation in the Deaf Sports Games, it must be said that the use of hearing aids represents a clear violation of the rules for participation in Deaflympics. It represents an attempt at overruling of the limit established by CISS. The rationale for this limit is to reassure that the participants are really deaf. The most interesting feature of this incidence was not, however, that an understanding of hearing as doping could occur. As an example of such a violation, we can take an example with the Iranian team. The ball hits the head / ear of the Iranian player and it becomes obvious, by the way he puts his hands to his head, that he has been wearing a hearing aid.
This is forbidden and recognised as cheating due to the 55 -dB limit. The result is that the referee calls the game off, and disqualifies the Iranian team. (2). In the book Deaf United the decline of British deaf football is considered with a restrained grief, and the future for deaf football are presented in a quite negative light. But it is not clear football nostalgia that is promoted, but that the process seems to fall together with general problems in the deaf world and how especially collective projects have meager conditions. The need for a conscious focus on new forms of collective mobilizing is therefore considered to represent the only possibility.
Deaf people face problems in their leisure activities to those they face in everyday life. They do not want to be regarded as disabled while accepting benefits and services intended for disabled people. The transnational feature of the Deaflympics is one of the main traits distinguishing these games from others ordinary games, where competitiveness and nationalism walk side by side. This is reflected in the general attitudes among the deaf athletes reporting that the core value of participation lies in the social and transnational networking practice (gaining deaf friends from all over the world) and winning something for your own nation becomes of secondary importance. (5). The competition and spirit surrounding the World Games for the Deaf is far closer to the Olympic ideal than that associated with the Olympics as the public knows it. We believe that there is a need for athletes to compete with each and other, and a need for a group of people with a commonality, deafness, to come together and share their experiences.
International Deaf sport competition actively promotes the old ideal of the Olympics the brotherhood of man through sports. 8 As a symbol for international reconciliation it is no doubt that the deaf Olympics are closer to these original ideals that the regular Olympics, now quite far away from reconciliation and fair play. Deaflympics demonstrates, thus, in many ways how an inter-national point of departure can be transformed into a transnational community sense and practice even if it is of a temporal nature. But, it is at the same time so, that Deaflympics in some respects comes dangerously close to the more negative aspects of present sportsmanship, as we have seen, in the hearing world. (3). There are huge differences among the athletes, since some sport branches includes just one concentrated stunt and thats it, while in other branches you are involved in tournaments that are ex-tended in time. This leaves you with fewer chances to be thoroughly immersed socially. The economical aspect is also important, because many athletes will have their travel and accommodation costs covered by others.
Some of the tourists were in this case expressing a kind of envy, as they were attracted to the economical benefits. This was most strongly expressed by one we met with, who was wondering which sports to chose in order to appear as an athlete in Melbourne 2005. This should preferably be a sports branch where he could get good in a hurry, without the laborious work of massive training. (1). There are good reasons to examine in more details the troublesome connections between deaf sports and the broader field of disability and that some of the causes for decay can be found here. The deaf community also suffers because of its ambiguous position within disabled sports. In order to have the best chance of obtaining funding from external sources either directly through sporting bodies or from the National Lottery deaf sports needs to come under the umbrella of disabled sports.
However, deaf sportsmen and women do not see themselves as disabled sports people. For reporting the score of a sports game, the home team score is produced at the chest and the visiting team is produced further away from the body. All numbers are produced so that the PO is towards the signer, even the numbers 6 to 9. The higher score is also always reported first. If there is a tie, the hands begin together and separate into the appropriate handshakes to report the score. If the progress of the game is being reported, the hands rise higher as the scores increase.
If the signer is neutral, that is does not support either team, the scores are reported on either hand, according to how the teams were specialized during the conversation, with the leading team first. (4). The following advice is summarized from online comments by Brian Mc Kenny and Jody. When the deaf player is at bat, the interpreter should stay in the dugout or coach's box. Some prefer to stand just off the playing field on the sidelines so that they can jump in more easily. Also the player can keep their eye out for the interpreter to feed them any information that was being hollered their way.
Most of the communication between players on the field takes place with sports signals. She can recognize a ball or strike by looking at the umpire. If the player is on base, the 1 st and 3 rd base coaches, who signal a runner to steal or keep running use hand signals to signify this. The interpreter for the practices and the player should learn these. If the player is a pitcher, the catcher gives hand signals for the type of pitch to use. The interpreter should be available for any time-outs between the coach, catcher, and pitcher.
These need to be interpreted. Otherwise, let him or her play. (5). If there is a "meeting" on field between any of the players or the coach and the players, the interpreter should use judgment as to whether or not to go out on the field. If the player says no, then don't. S/he will know very quickly if there is a need and may call you over later. For future meetings, you can go right out there.
It's best to inform both the umpire and the opposing coach that you will be interpreting before the game starts. This lessens confusion. Here are some comments from Mel, a Deaf coach: "I am a soccer fanatic and coach. My gut reaction as coach: I would not want an interpreter on the field of play. A deaf kid has to play the game at the same level as hearing kids. I think the rules of the game have to be respected and will determine if a child's handicap makes said activity possible. "On the other hand, I am all for having an interpreter at practice.
In fact, as a deaf coach, I find I am not able to give the kids the individual attention they deserve. Practices last one hour, but the part where communication is needed is only ten minutes or so. But we win while having a splendid time, and that is what the players like about coach Mel. (7). Many members of the Deaf community share the view that deafness is not a disability, but a cultural affiliation. The idea that deafness is in fact, a thriving culture is not a new one, nor is the idea, that deafness should be "fixed." The Deaf have turned their adaptation to something otherwise negative, deafness, into a way of life within which they can function happily and comfortably. (6).
It is uncertain if deaf sports will develop, as there are many questions with the financial support today. The one thing we can know, for sure, is that arrangements and events such as Deaflympics are strongly attractive within the deaf worlds, and that the need and desire for a transnational network is strong. There is also a clear tension between a national politics of normalization and integration, and the deaf movements collective politics of identity. It is expected to be a continual field of tension and a long-term challenge for both the deaf sports and the transnational deaf movement.
But there is a continuous hope that the games will go on. Bibliography: Atherton, Martin, Dave Russell and Graham H. Turner: Deaf United A history of football in the British deaf community, Coleford, UK: Douglas McLean, 2000. Breivik, Jan-Kare: Deaf Identities in the Making: Metaphors and Narratives inTrans local Lives, Dissertation in Social Anthropology, University of Oslo, 2001. Dress A. CISS Secretary.
New York: The Viking Press, 1994. Garza, C. Deaf awareness group promotes signing. Daily Texan Staff. February 27, 2002. Jerald Jordan, CISS Bulletin, New York: Cooper Square Publishers, Inc. , 1993.
web web web >
Free research essays on topics related to: deaf community, sign language, interpreter, deaf, coach
Research essay sample on Deaf Community Sign Language
