Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Average Grade Point Average Average Sat Score - 1,505 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Affirmative Action or Positive Discrimination Two people went to an interview for only one job position at the same company. The first person was just starting out in the field and seemed to lack the education, ambition and vision that was required of the job. The second person attended a prestigious and highly academic university, had years of work experience in the field and, in the mind of the employer, had the potential to make a positive impact on the companys performance. Adoption of the social policy known as affirmative action turns a relatively easy question, into a no win situation. After the United States Congress passed the Civil Rights Act in 1964, it became apparent that certain business traditions, such as seniority status and aptitude tests, prevented total equality in employment. Then President Lyndon B.

Johnson decided something needed to be done to remedy these flaws. On September 24, 1965, he issued Executive Order # 11246 at Howard University that required federal contractors to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed... without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin (Civil Rights). When Lyndon Johnson signed that order, he enacted one of the most discriminating pieces of legislation the United States has ever known. Affirmative action was created in an effort to help minorities leap the discriminative barriers that were ever so present when the bill was first enacted, in 1965.

At this time, the country was in the wake of nationwide civil-rights demonstrations, and racial tension was at its peak. White males, who controlled the hiring and firing of employees, occupied most of the corporate executive and managerial positions. The U. S.

government, in 1965, believed that these employers were discriminating against minorities and believed that there was no better time than the present to bring about change. When the Civil Rights Law passed, minorities believed that they should receive retribution for the years of discrimination they endured. The government responded by passing laws to aide them in attaining better employment as reprieve for the previous two hundred years of suffering their race endured at the hands of the white man. Supporters of affirmative action asked, why not let the government help them get better jobs? After all, the white man was responsible for their suffering. While this may all be true, there is another question that needs to be addressed.

Are we truly responsible for the years of persecution these minorities were subject to? The answer to the question is yes and no. It is true that the white man is partly responsible for the suppression of minorities. However, the individual white male is not. It is just as unfair and suppressive to hold many white males responsible for past persecution now, as it was to discriminate against many African-Americans in the generations before.

Why should an honest, hard working, open minded, white male be suppressed today for past injustice? Affirmative action accepts and condones the idea of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Two wrongs do not make a right. Affirmative action supporters make one large assumption when defending the policy.

They assume that minority groups want help. This, however, may not always be the case. My experience with minorities has led me to believe that they fought to attain equality, not special treatment. To them, the acceptance of special treatment is an admittance of inferiority. They ask, why cant I become successful on my own?

Why do I need laws to help me get a job? These African Americans want to be treated as equals, not as incompetents. In a statement released in 1981 by the United States Commission on Civil Rights, director the project Jack P. Harbor said: Only if discrimination were nothing more than the misguided acts of a few prejudiced individuals would affirmative action plans be reverse discrimination. Only if todays society were operating fairly toward minorities and women would measures that take race, sex, and national origin into account be preferential treatment. Only if discrimination were securely placed in a well-distant past would affirmative action be an unneeded and drastic remedy.

What the commission failed to realize was that there are thousands of white males who are not discriminating yet are being punished because of those who do. The Northern Natural Gas Company of Omaha, Nebraska, was forced by the government to release sixty-five white male workers to make room for minority employees in 1977 (Nebraska Advisory Committee 40). Five major Omaha corporations reported that the number of white managers fell 25 % in 1969 due to restrictions put on them when affirmative action was adopted (Nebraska Advisory Committee 27). You ask, what did these white males do to bring about their termination? The only crime that they were guilty of was being white. This hardly seems fair to punish so many innocent men for the past crimes of a relative few.

But the injustice toward the white male doesnt end there. After the white male has been fired, he has to go out and find a new job to support his family that depended on the company to provide health care and a retirement plan in return for years of hard work. Because of Affirmative action, this white male and the thousands like him are required to have more skills to get the same job that a lesser-qualified minority needs. This is, for all intents and purposes, discrimination.

A law that our government strictly enforces. Affirmative action is not only unfair for the working man, it is extremely discriminatory toward the executive, as well. The average business executive has one goal in mind, to maximize profits. To reach his goal the executive would naturally hire the most competent man or woman for the job, whether they are minority or not. Why would a businessman intentionally cause his business to lose money by hiring a poorly qualified worker? Most wouldnt.

With this in mind it seems unnecessary to employ any policy that would cause him to do otherwise, but that is exactly what affirmative action does. It forces an employer, who needs to meet a quota established by the government, to hire the minority no matter who is more qualified. Another way that affirmative action deducts from a companys profits is by forcing them to create jobs for minorities. This occurs when a company does not meet its quota with existing employees and has to find places to put minorities. These jobs are often unnecessary, and force a company to pay for workers that they do not need. Now, dont get the impression that affirmative action is only present in the work place.

It is also very powerful in education. Just as a white male employee needs more credentials to get a job than his minority opponent, a white male student needs more or better skills to get accepted at a prestigious university than a minority student. There are complete sections on college applications dedicated to race and ethnic background. Colleges must now have a completely diverse student body, even if that means some, more qualified students, must be turned away. A perfect example of this can be found at the University of California at Berkeley.

A 1995 report released by the university said that 9. 7 % of all accepted applicants were African American. Only 0. 8 % of these African American students were accepted by academic criteria alone. 36. 8 % of the accepted applicants were white. Of these accepted white students, 47. 9 % were accepted on academic criteria alone. That means that approximately sixty times more African Americans students were accepted due to non-academic influences than white students. It seems hard to believe that affirmative action wasnt one of these outside influences. Another interesting fact included in the 1995 report said that the average grade point average for a rejected white student was 3. 66 with an average SAT score of 1142.

The average grade point average for an accepted African American student was 3. 66 with a 1030 average SAT score. These stunning facts show just how many competent, if not gifted students fall between the cracks as a direct result of affirmative action (Affirmative action). Well, I believe that the problem has been identified; affirmative action is becoming a form of reverse discrimination. Society should work towards broad based economic policies like public investment, national health reform, an enlarged income tax credit, child support assurance, and other policies benefiting families with young children. Widely supported programs that promote the interests of both lower and middle class Americans that deliver benefits to minorities and whites on the basis of their economic status will do more to reduce minority poverty than the current, narrowly based, poorly supported policies that single out minority groups. However, if this, or another remedy is not taken sometime in the near future, and affirmative action continues to separate minority groups from whites, we can be sure to see racial tension reach points that our history has never seen.

Bibliography:


Free research essays on topics related to: affirmative action, racial tension, average sat score, reverse discrimination, average grade point average

Research essay sample on Average Grade Point Average Average Sat Score

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com