NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Canadas Immigration Policy Since not long ago, some changes were made in the Immigration Policy of Canada. Such changes can play an unfavorable role in the growing economy of the country. The Immigration Department now requires people, who want to settle in Canada, to meet the new selection criteria. More than that, it can happen not only when they apply, but also when their visas are issued already, which is often 3 - 4 years after they apply. 6 In this paper, we will discuss the importance of immigration for Canada throughout years, situation and changes in the immigration policy, and possible economic consequences of such changes. I will underline the vital part that immigration plays in Canada's growing economy.
The paper primarily will consist of three section and the conclusion. The first argument is that the decision made about the policy cannot be understandable from the historical point, when all the efforts were made to globalization and encouraging skilled professionals to immigrate to Canada. Can this move in the policy change the economy dramatically? In the second argument, we will go closer to the problem and touch the people and forces that effect the policy.
Minister Denis Coderre, his hearings and his actions will be the main parts of our discussion in this section. We will see how contradictory the promises and the real actions turned to be. In the third part, I will give you all possible arguments to prove that Canada has to be more open for immigrants. We will try to come closer to understanding of the economic importance of immigration. Let us look at the problem again. Under the new selection criteria, very few new applicants will qualify for the immigration pass points.
The new selection grid consider single applicants and applicants, who do not have job offers or family in Canada, not executable. It is also impossible to qualify for people, who have not worked or studied in Canada. Ability in French language became somewhat very important issue now. Under the previous system, an applicant needed 70 points out of 110. Now applicants need 75 out of 100, and the points are much harder to obtain. 8 Change at anytime in the policy removes all certainty and predictability from the system and makes the immigration system a lottery. There are other things that put applicants in a very difficult situation.
If we look back to 1967, we will see the point system which was established. It counted such qualifications as language and skills. The system aimed to avoid discrimination of any kind, primarily, because of the international peacekeeping and diplomacy. 2 That period of immigration policy standards remembers the main direction, which were European and Asian immigrants. It also counted the developing trade with third world countries.
Canada always looked to the globalization which allowed to steam the economy. Later in 1977, the immigration act transformed into the laws that Canada followed up to nowadays. The laws intended to promote Canada's demographic, economic, cultural and social goals. It also looked at fulfillment of Canada's international obligation with the UN, made in 1951. 7 The act required cooperation among all levels of government. The federal government, in its turn, had to consult with the provinces regarding planning and management of Canadian immigration. Such consulting and mutual understanding played an essential role in a healthy economic function.
According to the act, there are four basic categories for immigrants: family, humanitarian category, which includes refugees, people who are discriminated in their home country, independent people, who attempt to settle in Canada following their own initiative, and assisted relatives. 9 Throughout Canadian history, immigrants have played a key role in developing empty parts of the country. They met labor shortages and fueled economic growth. There was one thing that government wanted from immigrants. They had to fill the territory that needed labor and talent input. But Ottawa never forced newcomers to settle where they were told. It used incentives - cheap farmland, good schools, the promise of freedom.
Such an approach did not only give power to the economy in the developed areas, but also gave impulse to the regions where it was strongly needed. I dont know about other people but I wouldnt have qualified for Canadian immigration (under the new selection system), said B. C. Liberal Senator Mobile Jaffer who is a refugee lawyer. I am worried about retrospective legislation and discretionary points. I dont think this is a Canadian way of doing things. 5 (from Immigrant MPs Blast New Rules - Most immigrant MPs wouldnt get in: Hill Times Survey, The Hill Times, February 4 / 2002) As to the increase of the pass mark, the new rules were not made public until June 11, 2002.
How could any lawyer give any consulting without knowing what the pass mark would be? Many people submitted their application forms long before any notice about the new rules. How could an applicant who submitted his application in 1999 predict that the rules would change in 2002? Is it fare? it is wholly unacceptable that some skilled workers are trapped in the Canadian immigration system. The delays of the long process can cost Canada the opportunity to get enriched with leading talents.
What is it to do with the refunds? Refunding government processing fees will not solve all the problems since most people have invested far more than just the government fees. Most applicants have spent money on legal or consultant fees, translations, certifications, medicals, collecting documents, notarizing documents, courier fees, travel costs, skills or language upgrading, opportunity costs, etc. 6 What would a person like Mr. X do with the new standards? Let take this example. Our Mr.
X is a biochemist from Germany. He has a Ph. D in biochemistry, and he has 8 years of work experience as a biochemist at Germany's most prestigious research university. Mr. X is fluent in English. Mr.
X is married, but his spouse did not attend college or university. Mr. X is thirty eight years old. Mr. X does not qualify under the new immigration regulations. He is eligible to receive only 72 points.
Seventy five points are needed to qualify now. A biochemical company in Canada has a harp deficit of such specialists, and had probably built a lot of plans with Mr. X. 10 And this is only one example of approximately 100, 000 people waiting for their turn. There are things that really have gone too far beyond understanding. It is enough to read the last newspapers to see a terrible picture. There is a story about the Polish family that's being deported because of a $ 50 mix up.
The family paid $ 1150. 00 confused about the actual cost of $ 1200. 00. They are being kicked out of our great country because of $ 50. Is that pathetic or what? We can count the fact the they turned to be there illegally. Shouldn't they be given the right to stay in Canada? Canada is the second biggest country in the world, and have one of the smallest populations in the G 7, and if that isn't bad, the population is not growing rapidly. 7 Economically based, a growing shortage of skilled workers requires taking additional efforts to attract immigrants.
Only one health-care sector had high pay deals to retain and attract key staff. But not only the health sector demands skilled professionals. In a survey by Compas Inc. , two thirds of Canadian executives report difficulties in recruiting skilled labor. While the problem is most acute in Atlantic Canada and Quebec, the executives on the Prairies say their firms have trouble finding skilled workers. 8 This system of selecting "smart" workers does not reflect the reality of Canadian employers who need workers with specialized skills. 6 The previous immigration system was much better at selecting the high-in-demand skilled workers.
There was a great opportunity to take the right specialist at the right time. In such case the labor demand is satisfied without having any influences on some economic factors. The main economic question now is if labor costs can gain critical importance in the economic balance. We will come to the discussion of this question a little bit later after looking at the forces that made the changes in the Immigration Policy. Liberals came to power in 1993. Rather than increasing immigration, they drove it down.
The cutbacks in staffing at the immigration department were so deep that the bureaucrats are still struggling to cope with a massive list of applications. One of the most influential people of the immigration policy leading, minister Denis Coderre, was to call for public hearings on new immigration regulations proposed by his predecessor in December 2001. Minister Coderre promised to listen to the public, industry groups, and immigration professionals. "I am committed to a transparent and open regulation-making process and this means giving Canadians a chance to express their views on the proposed regulations before they are approved and the legislation takes effect. 9 But it looks like he did not manage to keep his words. The public opinion asked in January, February and March of 2002 turned to be a waist of time. Minister Coderre ignored what he heard. Instead, he revised the new immigration regulations to make it even more difficult for applicants to qualify. 4 (-from The Toronto Star, June 17 / 2002).
On June 28, 2002, the new regulations came into force. They are being imposed to cases already in process. Minister Coderre acts in the interests of bureaucrats in his department who want to ease their workloads. He has to look at the economy, which can suffer because of such actions.
Fontana (Liberal MP & Chair of the House of Commons Committee on Immigration) admitted that making the new rules retroactive was unfair, even with the more lenient point requirements, and suggested the committee would pressure Coderre to change his mind. I think the minister may want to look at that again, he said. 8 There's good reason for Canada to welcome the Italian tradesman, the doctor from India and other skilled workers from abroad. At the national level, most new immigrants come from China, India, Pakistan and the Philippines, with most heading to Ontario, followed by British Columbia and Quebec. They " re needed to fill jobs and pay taxes. By 2020, a million jobs in Canada could go unfilled. Canadians are becoming more dependent on immigrants who always made great input into the development of the economy.
As it was mentioned before, Canada historically used the service of immigrants, and it became a significant feature of the political approach. This approach that finds itself in globalization is the right way towards continues economic growth. By closing the boarders for good and, at the time, needed specialists, Canada can only lose a chance to keep pace in the way of economic development. 1 Does the present policy contradict with the goals of Globalization. And the answer is evident.
Lets look at the history of other G 7 countries. They all take tremendous efforts towards globalization, and have not yet made any dramatic changes in there immigration policy systems. If we look at the economic situation that such changes of immigration policy can bring, we will see a hilt of danger for the growing economy of Canada. If the demand for qualified specialists is not satisfied, the producer prices can rise unpredictably...
Free research essays on topics related to: economic growth, canadian immigration, immigration policy, skilled workers, g 7
Research essay sample on Skilled Workers Canadian Immigration
