Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Cause And Effect Matters Of Fact - 1,421 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Hume Hume was one of the greatest world philosophers who had his assumptions and argumentation concerning almost any philosophical issues presented for society. His test for the meaningfulness of an idea involves the clear evaluation of any particular idea and than looking for justification for that idea. As long as any idea has particular proof or solid base that it is expressed on the idea can be considered meaningful. The revival of skepticism, brought about by these new concepts, had many philosophers seeking answers to questions such as: Do we know anything at all, and do the sciences give us knowledge of reality? Rene Descartes, whom many consider to be the father of modern philosophy, sought to kill skepticism for good.

He gave his Cartesian quest for certainty the center stage in his epistemology, or theory of knowledge. Following Descartes, later in the 18 th century, David Hume also broke away from the religious dogma of the day to explain knowledge on a non-theological basis. However, His epistemology dismisses Cartesian methods as both unworkable and barren. Instead, he adopts his own theories, which counter the ideas of his of predecessor, and casts a different view on the levels of certainty humans can obtain. (Lavine) Contrary to his rational predecessor, British philosopher David Hume approached his epistemology with an empirical view.

Because he denied miracles and other religious dogmas, he believed that clarification was the first thing he needed to do in order to remove them, as well as dissolve the Cartesian method of thinking. This is to say that he wanted a clean slate (Tabula Ross. ) To do this, he believed that, unlike Descartes axioms (first principals, ) perceptions were the main content of knowledge. Hume believed that a porn ideas did not exist and that our ideas are not innate, but derived purely from experience of perceptions. According to Hume, perceptions, can be reduced to impressions and ideas. He believed that humans learned ideas through impressions, and that if there is no impression, there is no idea. (Lavine) Therefore this clearly formed a dependence of ideas on the initial impression that made them. Unlike Descartes belief that reason is the same for every person, Hume believed that every individuals perceptions were his alone, and distinct from other peoples.

Hume believed that three principals of association bound perceptions together: Resemblance, Contiguity (in time or place, ) and Cause and Effect. By resemblance, Hume uses the example of a picture of something evokes the thought of the original. For Contiguity, Hume refers to the mention of an apartment building would invoke the thought of other apartment buildings. And if one thinks of a wound, they would think of the pain that is associated with it (cause and effect. ) These are also Humes objects of knowledge, and are used in the method to determine whether certainty exists. Descartes- method Descartes decides to base his method on fours rules or laws. The first rule was to never accept anything for true which was not clearly known to be such; that is to say, avoid precipitance and prejudice, and to comprise nothing more in judgment than what was presented to the mind so clearly and distinctly as to exclude all grounds of doubt.

The second rule was to divide each of the difficulties under examination into as many manageable parts as possible for its adequate solution. The third was to conduct thoughts in such order that, by commencing with objects the simplest and easiest to know, they ascend by little and little to the idea of the more complex; therefore, assigning in thought a certain order even to those objects which in their own nature do not stand in a relation of antecedence and sequence. The forth and last rule was to make enumerations so complete, and reviews so general, that it be assured that nothing was omitted. (Lavine) Hume believed that Causation is the method of which humans reason. He believed that it is causation that allows us to reach out beyond the limits of present sensation and memories. With this in mind, Hume divided all human reason into two kinds: relations of ideas -- that is, reasoning found in mathematics and logic, such as 2 + 3 = 5; which is certain not because it introduces us to such a world of realities, but simply because of how it relates ideas to one another. Hume also recognizes matters of fact- that is, reasoning derived from sense perception such as the sun will rise tomorrow.

These are clearly conceived related ideas that could possibly be true, but the evidence is never great enough to amount to certainty. Hume believes that all our reasoning of matters of fact beyond perception and memory is founded on the relation of cause and effect. Causes are nothing more then projections onto a supposed objective world from a feeling in the mind. We may be able to say one event follows another, but we cannot say that one event caused the other. For example, night follows day, but day did not cause night. Contrary to Descartes belief that effects must come from a cause, Hume believed that causes are senseless and not uncertain.

It is clear, therefore, that unlike Descartes, who used skepticism to arrive at truth, Hume was a skeptic through and through. The Certainty and limits of knowledge- Descartes Although Descartes used methodical doubt; he only used it in order to establish certainty. Descartes arrived at the conclusion that the universe has a mathematically logical structure and that a single method of reasoning could apply to all natural sciences, providing a unified body of knowledge. He believed he had discovered such a method by breaking a problem down into parts, accepting as true only clear, distinct ideas that could not be doubted, and systematically deducing one conclusion from another. From this certainty Descartes expanded knowledge, step by step, to admit the existence of God (as the first cause) based on reason and not faith, and the reality of the physical world, which he held to be mechanistic and entirely divorced from the mind. (Lavine) Descartes believed therefore, that human knowledge becomes the complete correlation of reality. This is to say that there is no question so far removed from us as to be beyond our reach or so deeply hidden that we cannot discover it The mind is equally intelligent however diverse the objects it considers; and those objects because of their perfect enchainment are always equally intelligible. (Lavine) Therefore it is possible to say that humes perception of the meaningfulness of an idea depended largely on the concepts of certainty and limits.

Humes empirical line of inquiry called into question our common sense beliefs about the source and support of our sense perceptions. Hume maintains that we cannot provide a priori justifications for a number of our beliefs like, Objects and subjects persist identically over time, or Every event must have a cause. In Humes hands, it becomes clear that empiricism cannot give us an epistemological justification for the claims about objects, subjects, and causes that we took to be most obvious and certain about the world. Everything known, he said, depends on perception, but perception can never get any evidence outside itself to verify anything.

Real knowledge, in his eyes, became completely impossible to achieve In conclusion, both Rene Descartes and David Hume lived in a revolutionary and turbulent time in history. This is to say that, the revolutionary impact of modern science caused tremendous changes in the thoughts of scientists, philosophers, and men alike. Many of Rene Descartes and David Humes ideas are still used as the foundations of modern thought today. Hume expressed our main concern about the meaningfulness of an idea in his philosophical works.

This notion proves to be so destructive to other philosophers such as Descartes and Lock on the basis of its irrationality. The fact that Descartes was the representative of the rational philosophical movement make his standpoint to be the one of big argument to what Hume had to say concerning the meaningfulness of an idea. Hume had his a priori approach towards the notions of mind and ideas and that approach involved the factual basis for the proof of the idea to be rational. Therefore such metaphysical approach towards the perception of mind and thought as was supported by Descartes has many contradictions to what Hume had to say.

Bibliography: T. Z. Lavine, From Socrates To Sartre, New York: Viking Press 2 nd Edition, 1998


Free research essays on topics related to: matters of fact, one event, cause and effect, david hume, rene descartes

Research essay sample on Cause And Effect Matters Of Fact

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com