NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
The New Pearl Harbor by David Griffin David Ray Griffin is a professor of philosophy, religion and theology at the Claremont School of Theology in California for over 30 years. He is co-director of the Center for Process Studies there and the author or editor of over 20 books. His book The New Pearl Harbor is written for those who, in any way, doubt the trueness of the information presented to the people by the Bush administration regarding the most horrible terrorist attack in the history of America. The information shown in this book is distressing as it really must be. Griffin's book looks deeply in answering the disturbing question that long time ago appeared in American politics: What did the President know, and when did he know it?" The second edition of this book has a 30 -page Afterword with supplementary material on the suspected hijackers, controlled destruction of the WTC, Sibel Edmonds, and the 9 / 11 Commission, a decisions of whether Standard Operating Procedures was altered in June 2001: Griffin is the famous philosopher and theologian, who brought together all the information about the tragedy that is much more rational than to take one point of view and believe it. He did it from a dubious vantage-ground, but also taking seriously the classic idea that those who have advantage from a crime must to be found.
Griffin shows a case cant make anyone doubt that the attacks of 9 / 11 must to be carefully investigated. The author gathered stories from the press, deferent overviews made by other countries, the work of other researchers, and the incongruous words of the Bush administration members: I, however, devoted an entire section (NPH 36 - 39) to various ways that critics of the official account have dealt with the fact that many people reported seeing an American Airlines plane going toward the Pentagon. I then, in explaining Meyssans approach, mentioned that he pointed out that "there were also several reports of eyewitnesses who said that the aircraft looked and / or sounded like a missile or a military plane. " I also said that Meyssan showed that "the eyewitnesses supportive of the official theory are at least partly balanced off by eyewitnesses supportive of the missile theory" The disconcerting questions appear from any part of the story, till it is impossible not to critically disbelief the official story, and suspect its creators of huge dishonesty. Griffin taught ethics and systematic theology for a long time, so he wrote with convincing and obsessive logic, making readers create their own opinion on the base of the given facts. The New Pearl Harbor makes people believe that even nowadays in our modern world it is possible to find a truth; it is a emotive call that we insist on a real analysis on what really happened on 9 / 11. Griffin's The New Pearl Harbor seems to be an interesting detective story, because he offers readers a trip through a jumble of disquieting issues about what was the preconditions and consequences of September 11, 2001.
In the end the readers souls are full not only with the plane routes, rules, and ruins; the destruction of WTC establishments and part of the Pentagon, but also with Administration observations, actions, and background in which definite program could be continued. And the question is what people should do with all these data. Everybody sees the need for real analysis and revelation of what happened on that important day. Griffins remind us that we were strongly affected by this day and the further investigation must be gone.
That 9 / 11 is an important moment in the history of the USA and that cannot be denied. But its strict implication is an exceptionally arguable question in spite of the apparent clearness of existing records. David Ray Griffin shows those data with a lot of puzzles powerfully reminiscent of blameworthy participation by US officials in the happened. His book shows an unquestionable argument of the necessity for an indisputably full and self-governing study of that well-known day. One of the major difficulties in understanding what happened on 9 / 11 is the difficulty of the whole situation. David Ray Griffin has collected and brought together many of the most believable proofs we can find into his The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9 / 11 (2004).
And he explains: "[T]his evidence is so extensive and of such a nature that no individual especially no individual with very limited time and resources could check out its accuracy... [However, if] a significant portion of the evidence summarized here holds up, the conclusion that the attacks on 9 / 11 succeeded because of official complicity would be virtually inescapable (xxiii). " Having read the book, I found these words the most important. Griffin offers the readers an isolated and academic method of estimating the facts and different theories provided to explain what that proofs mean. For him to make such a conclusion after having experienced his methodological and judicious assessment of what I would call very damning evidence, makes his conclusion very compelling. The aim The New Pearl Harbor: is to show the dishonesty of the official "ineptitude" theory of 9 / 11 which allows it to credibly define more plausible scenarios which seem to give answers to many famous questions concerning the attacks that happened on 9 / 11 / 2001. Griffin states that his argument is combined; it is an argument consisting of several particulars that are independent of each other (p.
xxiv). When the hijacked planes departed from their programmed places on 9 / 11, then certain document would have required the certain services to check the planes. This was not done. Having added to this the proofs that an attack was deliberate and the strange behavior of the president, Griffin made a conclusion that he has a strong prima facie case for official complicity that needs investigation (p. xxiii).
By writing his book David Ray Griffin gives the real ground for another scientists to continue the work. This year we saw the film Hijacking Catastrophe 9 / 11, Fear & the Selling of American Empire, that is to my mind was based on that documentation. This is a powerful film, impacted people more than Fahrenheit. Hijacking Catastrophe shows the facts without any additional business.
This film shows its argument in a way that is convincing, summarizing and attractive. The movie is considered to be the best of the Bush-bashing documentaries. There's nothing like facts to impeach a case, and these facts about the Bush administrations pre- 9 / 11 purpose to attack Iraq are nothing if not proved. With careful detail, it shows the case that the World Trade Center attacks activated a device in place among conservatives. While shunning Fahrenheit 9 / 11 's jumble of rough coverage and bluster, this controversial documentary is similarly irate and just as provoking. Hijacking Catastrophe is the best film about the catastrophe of recent years.
No matter what political positions you may have, this is an significant and informative documentary to see. It is a great movie that like David Ray Griffins book looks like a good detective story, tracing the documentary proof. It is a shocking analysis of the Bush administration's drive to war. The movie brightly shows the US imperial plans. Hijacking Catastrophe shows an essential way for translating of Washington's report of the attacks in Iraq, and it will serve as a guide also for the future generations. This is the best, most inclusive clarification of the reasons, the primary philosophy, behind the Bush administrations headfirst driving force into war with Iraq.
It answers the question so many people are usually asking. David Ray Griffin has done commendable and careful investigation in analysis the secrecy about the 9 - 11 attacks. It is the most influential argument I have seen for extra study of the Bush administration's connection to that remarkable and upsetting episode. As David Ray Griffin writes in The New Pearl Harbor, "It almost seems to be a requirement of admission into public discourse to announce that one rejects conspiracy thinking. " That shows us how the professor from Claremont School of Theology in California treats the alternating versions of 9 / 11. Why the USA failed to prevent the attacks?
Was it a fortuity or a plot of the officials? It was impossible to find out because the important information was hidden by the government. But now this information is available due to the given book so that people can become more informed about the nature and operations of the government. One scientists wrote: The antagonism in David Ray Griffins book is against America. He quotes with approval the journalist Patrick Martin, In examining any crime, a central question must be who benefits? The principal beneficiaries of the destruction of the World Trade Center are in the United States: the Bush administration, the Pentagon, the CIA and FBI, the weapons industry, the oil industry.
It is reasonable to ask whether those who have profited to such an extent from this tragedy contributed to bringing it about (p. 127). Apparently, the ways in which Bush et al have benefited include: increased popularity after 9 / 11, vast increase in military spending, more funding for covert operations, fresh support for the missile defense system and so on He also admitted: If David Ray Griffin had come to me, I would have refused to endorse the book. I do not think the book should have been written. It feeds a paranoia that is not justified. In so doing, it distorts significantly the legitimate political discourse that should challenge this administration. There are problems with current policy that should be pointed out, but suggesting that Bush cooperated with the terrorists is not one of them.
I strongly disagree with such point of view. I recognize that the facts that are illustrated in the book are distressing but we should know about them. I think that the people with such opinion simply do not understand the horror of this situation. They do not want to know the truth because they do not care about the state and its future. They do not suffer together with the whole state, dont feel its pain. If we do not investigate the reasons we would never find a way to defend our state from such cases.
And the idea of David Ray Griffin is that not only officials and the authorized people should do that, but all the citizens of the United States. No one can better defend the state that the people living in it. Here we should rather listen to the people who really suffered from what happened: "It will be painful, and disturbing, to turn the pages of this thoughtful and meticulously researched book. But turn we must.
For we owe the truth to those who died, and nothing less. " Colleen Kelly, sister of Bill Kelly, Jr. , who was killed in the North Tower of the World Trade Center on 9 / 11, and Co-Founder of September 11 th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows. If you are really want to know the truth about the events of 9 / 11 you will really appreciate what Griffin wrote in two-hundred pages with truthful footnotes The New Pearl Harbor doesnt have as a primary goal to explain "what really happened, " it tries to show the ridiculousness of the official version of events. I think that people must be grateful to the author of the book for lending his documents and seriousness of the attitude to the questions of 9 / 11. Bibliography Beach, Christopher M. For the president's eyes only: secret intelligence and the American presidency.
New York, 2004 Andrew, Edward L. Scapegoats: A Defense of Kimmel & Short at Pearl Harbor, New York, 2004 Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9 / 11. by David Ray Griffin foreword by Richard Folk, New York 2004
Free research essays on topics related to: bush administration, pearl harbor, point of view, world trade center, detective story
Research essay sample on World Trade Center Point Of View
