NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Sociology Assignment 1. Here are the concepts: Folkways- this refers t human behavior that comes out of the past. The traditions that exist during long period of time and have their roots in past are said to be folk traditions. 2. I think that this sociological concept shows the history of a particular social group of people and their activities that took place in the past. 3. The article below shows how do the official people behave when they meet each other.
Here we see some special staff that corresponds to this particular group of people and is usually not avoided. 4. The folk ways are seen in the traditional type of the meeting between the states leaders. Just like in the past, they have certain ceremonies while they meet. The link between the concept and the article is seen in the presentation in the article of some special actions taken by a certain group of people in a certain live situation. Abstract from the article: Prime Minister Jean Chretien shares a laugh with former Chinese President Jiang Zenmin as they ride a golf cart to tour his domain in Hangzhou, China, Thursday. (CP/Paul Chiasson) QINSHAN, China (CP) - Team Canada trade missions are about to be cancelled in a "stupid" move by Paul Martin, predicts the top adviser to Prime Minister Jean Chretien.
The massive trade delegations will die because Martin, the prime minister-in-waiting, doesn't want to follow a practice associated with Chretien, said chief of staff Eddie Goldenberg. "They " re going to cancel it because we did it, " Goldenberg was overheard saying Thursday. "It's really stupid. " Scott Reid, a spokesman for Martin, said Goldenberg "has no involvement in our transition planning and is therefore poorly positioned to speculate about any changes we might put into effect. " Whole article is on web Culture - the learned social behavior f members f society. Culture is a kind f blueprint fr living - it is als referred t as the collective way f life f a society. With culture society would nt function. 2. This is a very broad and important term. This usually represents the whole country meaning society behaviour as they live and do their things. Two different countries usually have different cultures.
The differences are usually minor but sometimes they may be a great deal, for example in the countries with different political regimes. 3. The article below shows some aspects that correspond to the American culture. We see how it has changed during the 20 th Century. 4. The link between the concept and the article is in the development of the major notions of the concept in the article. The article tells the reader what influenced certain behaviours of people to form a set of norms and behaviours that sum up into a notion called culture. From Quebec statesman: American Culture, American Tastes: Social Change and the 20 th Century.
Author / s : Paul Boyer Issue: With, 2002 American Culture, American Tastes: Social Change and the 20 th Century. By Michael Kammen. Beginning as an American colonial historian and proceeding recently to broad-gauge studies of U. S. cultural history, the prolific author of this study has taken up the theme of American culture and taste from a broad perspective in this latest work. American Culture, American Tastes displays all of Michael Kammen's well-recognized strengths: a keen historical imagination, generosity toward other scholars, a high degree of objectivity, immersion in the sources, and the use of telling examples to make his argument.
Tracing the emergence of mass culture in America, Kammen seeks a "more nuanced periodization" and criticizes a historical approaches that telescope or oversimplify this process. As a partially commercialized popular culture evolved into a more fully com modified, mass culture, he stresses, popular culture survived, displaying remarkable powers of endurance and adaptation. Kammen pinpoints 1885 - 1935 as the heyday of a commercialized popular culture of magazines, vaudeville, music halls, Tin Pan Alley, and early film and radio. But, while a proto mass culture was emerging, the commercial culture of 1885 - 1935 was distinguished from what lay ahead by greater interactivity and vast differences of scale. The sources of the full-fledged mass culture that emerged after World War II, he argues, lay in the syndication of newspaper features and comic strips, the rise of network radio, and the expansion of fast food chains -- a process that eventually spawned global corporations like McDonald's. Kammen highlights the importance of World War II, when culture promoted patriotism, in the mass-culture transition.
Television, Kammen argues (along with many others), brought the com modified mass culture to full fruition. One might note that the progression of popular religion from the Gilded Age revivals of Dwight L. Moody and Aimee Semple McPherson's performances in Los Angeles as well as Charles E. Fuller's folksy "Old Fashioned Revival Hour" radio program in the 1920 s and 1930 s to today's mass-market religious paperbacks and televangelists with global "ministries" nicely fits Kammen's cultural periodization. In the debate over whether television viewers are passive consumers or active participants in creating cultural meaning from the "texts" available, Kammen aligns himself with those who stress passivity, and thoughtfully criticizes John Fiske and others who find a greater degree of agency. Kammen next traces the evolution of ideas about cultural stratification from the era of genteel critics like Matthew Arnold, who sharply differentiated "high culture" from middle-class philistinism and lower-class vulgarity, to the mid-twentieth century, when Russell Lynes and Life magazine played the "highbrow-middlebrow-lowbrow" game (and when neo-Arnoldians Dwight Macdonald and Clement Greenberg railed against threats to high culture), to the collapse of the entire cultural-stratification enterprise.
In an era of the Three Tenors; Monday Night Football; Andy Warhol's "Campbell Soup Cans"; and inner-city, hip-hop fashions that quickly spread to affluent suburbs, who knows from cultural hierarchy? Turning to a related theme, Kammen explores the progression of cultural criticism from nineteenth-century arbiters such as Richard Watson Gilder, who upheld the Arnoldian ideal, to influential champions of the rebellious and the new, such as Henry L. Mencken, to the contemporary era of diffuse, de centered criticism. Personal opinion rules; no one outranks anyone else. With the waning of cultural authority, he argues, the corporations that generate and disseminate cultural products exert ever-increasing power. In the concluding chapter, the author reprises the argument and offers thought-provoking comments on Ken Burns's effort to bring history to the people via his PBS Civil War documentary and the Museum of Modern Art's controversial 1990 show, "High and Low: Modern Art and Popular Culture" Kammen's historical focus precludes much attention to two seemingly contradictory contemporary trends: on the one hand, the concentration of mass-culture power in ever-larger global media conglomerates, and, on the other, the dizzying proliferation of cable television channels, "broad band" satellite communications, the spread of low-power FM stations, the ubiquitous World Wide Web, the prospect of "do-it-yourself" CDs, and other trends that may auger a new era of diversity and interactivity.
As the mass culture evolves, propelled by new technologies, capitalism's drive for profits and market share, and the actions and preferences of millions of individuals, it is fascinating to speculate what a comparable book published in 2100 (if books still exist) will have to say. Meanwhile, American Culture, American Tastes provides a superb critical history of American culture -- and cultural criticism -- in the century just closed. Paul Boyer University of Wisconsin Scialisatin - The press by which members f society learn culture. This is an nine press that starts with primary socialisation in the family and continues with secondary socialisation in education, at wrk and in the media. 2. This is a sociological process of people (members of society) learning the norms and rules by which the society operates. 3. In the article below we see the learning process that takes place usually within a family by which family members learn norms and procedures by which their society lives. 4.
The link between the article and the sociological concept is in the transition of knowledge concerning norms and procedures within a family.
From Eastern Economist (Canada): Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Author / s : Joe Claymond Issue: Spring, 2003 BLUM-KULKA, Shoshana. Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997. Blum-Kulka demonstrates that dinner-table conversations are like holograms, each one a complete, if fuzzy, picture of the diners' culture and their procedures for socializing their children. She has put together one hundred two such meal-time conversations, to give us a fully configured, sharply focused picture of how children become members of their parents' culture, and how parents' behavior shifts to accommodate new cultural influences. Blum-Kulka studied thirty-four families in the United States and in Israel.
Their talk during dinner, recorded, transcribed, and analyzed, sheds light on socialization, cultural membership, narrative, code-switching, meta pragmatic skills, topic development, and politeness. Chapters include: cultural patterns of communication; the dynamics of dinner talk; topical actions at dinner; telling, tales, and tellers in family narrative events; politeness in family discourse -- the traffic of parental social control acts; meta pragmatic discourse; bilingual socialization -- the interrupt ural style of American Israeli families; and family, talk, and culture. Nrms - specific guidelines n behavior in particular situations, e. g. there are nrm's relating t dress which define what is acceptable clothing at wrk, hme, schl etc. 2. Specific ways of acting and behaving corresponding to the situation that you got into.
Usually very similar to various societies. 3. The article below tells the reader the specific norms of behaviour of students when they are at school. These norms are very different from those when they are at times of rest and the article clearly expresses it. 4. The link between the concept and the article is seen in the explanations of certain norms that are world accepted and added by students.
These norms tell that college age people should not be abusing or else using alcohol in their day to day activities. From Ontario Day: National Conference Touts Progress in Preventing College Alcohol Abuse; Gathering Draws Hundreds, Demonstrating Expansion and Success of Social Norms Model. Author / s : Ben Hutson Issue: July 18, 2003 BOSTON, July 18 /PRNewswire/ -- The sixth National Conference on the Social Norms Model, which just concluded in Boston, drew an international roster of attendees who reviewed successful social norms intervention programs...
Free research essays on topics related to: american culture, popular culture, prime minister, mass culture, social norms
Research essay sample on Mass Culture Prime Minister
