NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Final Paper (1) Friedrich Nietzsche is being rightly referred to as one of the most progressive philosophers of 19 th century. He was the first thinker of high social standing, who had courage to publicly oppose Christian obscurity, as such that is counter-productive, in evolutionary sense of this word. Therefore, we can say that his intellectual contribution to cultural and scientific progress, with which we associate 20 th century, was indispensable. It will not be an exaggeration to suggest that Christianity, as religious doctrine, was deprived of remains of its credibility, after Nietzsche had published his famous works On the Genealogy of Morals, Beyond Good and Evil and The Antichrist, in which he was able to expose existential inconsistency of religion of peace and tolerance, as such that serves as metaphysical foundation, upon which conventional morality is built.
In this essay, we will dispel the myth of Nietzsche's philosophy being nihilist in its essence and will analyze his criticism of traditional morality as such that provides us with the insight on what proper existential ethics should be. (2) The reason why Nietzsche had adopted an uncompromising attitude towards conventional morality is that he considered it being incompatible with biological destiny of a White man. Philosopher was well aware of Darwin's theory of evolution, which refers to homo sapiens as intermediate link between ape and a super-man; therefore, he rightly considered Christianity to be a spiritual poison, which denies people the prospects of biological advancement. In order for us to understand why Nietzsche was so strongly opposed against Christian morality, we will have to provide readers with historical retrospective on this Semitic religion. The extent, to which Christianity has rooted itself into the public consciousness, can be measured by the fact, that we, whatever our attitude towards this religion might be, are still using the calendar, which has the birth of Jesus Christ as its starting point.
When one begins to study ancient history, he gets to experience a certain psychological discomfort, related to dealing with this counter wise conception of time. On one hand, there is a continuous development, cultural exultation, perfection in forms, skills and knowledge, heyday of all sciences, on the other this counter wise countdown, that usually precedes the launch of a missile or the test of nuclear weapon. It turns historical process inside out, while creating the illusion of time disappearance. The probability of getting a comprehensive response to a question in what year was Jesus Christ born? is going to be very low, despite the fact that everybody knows the answer. It appears that Christ was born beyond time, in year 0.
His birth has inaugurated the beginning of the end, of what in time of overwhelming domination of Christianity Middle Ages, will be referred to as golden age. Such was the conclusion of the First Coming. Greeks and Roman ideals of beauty and perfection, embodied in sculptures (almost all of them were destroyed by Christians), yielded to retards, midgets, hunchbacks, lunatics and impotent's. The same thing happened in intellectual domain, as well. Ancient science, which was a veritable science, in most of its notions, was replaced by so many pseudo-sciences, that their brief survey would represent an encyclopedic task. It was very difficult for the science to break out of Christian imprisonment.
The number of intellectuals, killed by Church, greatly overextends the number of Saints and Holy men, who were murdered for their faith. Let us imagine the emergence of a new totalitarian religious cult. Its members do not take bath, do not shave, do not bury dead bodies and often cut off their own genitals for the glory of God. They deny every principle, upon which the society is based. They even refuse to cross streets on green light and for their symbol - they adopt guillotine.
Such were the original Christians. Therefore, it is quite explainable why many Roman politicians and philosophers resisted the spread of Christianity. There were about 200 different religious cults in Rome, at the time. However, neither of them was quite as anti-social as the religion of love and tolerance.
Fortunately enough, we live in time when Christianity has entered its twilight. It is being shaken by philosophers, scientists, engineers and even by those, who were supposed to protect it from harmful influences professors of theology and Christian leaders, such as Jan Hus and Martin Luther. However, it was not up until Friedrich Nietzsche began bombarding Christianity intellectually that the ideological inconsistency of Christian ethics became obvious for just about anyone, whose sense of logic has not been completely atrophied. In his essay, The Antichrist, Nietzsche charges Christian morality with draining a life-force out of people who seriously consider a homeless bum from Nazarene as God: Christianity is called the religion of pity. Pity stands in opposition to all the tonic passions that augment the energy of the feeling of aliveness: it is a depressant. A man loses power when he pities Suffering is made contagious by pity; under certain circumstances it may lead to a total sacrifice of life and living energy -- a loss out of all proportion to the magnitude of the cause Pity thwarts the whole law of evolution, which is the law of natural selection.
It preserves whatever is ripe for destruction; it fights on the side of those disinherited and condemned by life (Nietzsche, 7). It is hard to disagree with the author. The present existential status of White race, as such that is being affected by Christian poison the most, confirms Nietzsche's conclusion better than anything else does. For example, while nominally being considered the masters in European countries, White people would never risk setting foot on the streets of ghetto, in their own cities, especially after it gets dark.
This has a direct link to the fact that White people ceased to be the subjects of natural selection, which results in their physical and mental degradation. It is not a secret that in Western countries, the half of young peoples income is being taken away from them in taxes, in order to support aging White folks in assisted living facilities, who are burdened with their own existence and who have absolutely no social value whatsoever. The value of human life is considered un disputable, even though such point of view contradicts the law of nature. The mainstream Medias strive to make us feel pity towards poor children of Somalia, in order to make us to come up with financial donations to the good cause, without mentioning the fact that population of this country has tripled within a matter of last 25 years, while being subjected to never ending civil wars and famine.
Liberal politicians never stop whining about the legacy of White colonialism, without being able to realize that their own countries are now being colonized by the hordes of illegal immigrants from Third World countries. As result, it is only the matter of time, before these countries will regress into savagery, as it always been the case with societies that tolerated racial mixing. The reason why it happens is that the dominant morality in Western countries derives out of Christianity, which in its turn, is spiritually alien to the existential psyche of White people. In his book On the Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche explains why morals that exploit Semitic worldview cannot be regarded as beneficial in principle: In opposition to the aristocratic value equations (good = noble = powerful = beautiful = fortunate = loved by god), the Jews, with a consistency inspiring fear, dared to reverse things and to hang on to that with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of the powerless), that is, to only those who suffer are good; the poor, the powerless, the low are the only good people; the suffering, those in need, the sick, the ugly are also the only pious people; only they are blessed by God; for them alone there is salvation (Nietzsche, Ch. 1, 6). Thus, it would be wrong to refer to Nietzsche's philosophy as being nihilist in its essence, as many people do.
He simply strived to prevent people from making costly mistakes. The example of former Rhodesia illustrates the full extent of Christianity's harmfulness. Because the majority of White farmers in this country used to be a Bible thumping Christians, they adopted a patronizing attitude towards Blacks. They used to think of them as little children who needed assistance to get their act together. As result, many of these farmers ended up with their heads cut off, after Robert Mugabe came to power and Rhodesia was renamed into Zimbabwe. In his article Zimbabwe: Liberal Consequences, William Pierce rightly suggest that: The reason Rhodesia is called Zimbabwe today is that in 1979, the White Rhodesian's, decided to let Blacks vote for the next government of Rhodesia.
Since there were at that time six million Blacks living in Rhodesia and only 275, 000 White Rhodesian's, this was in effect a decision by the White Rhodesian's to commit collective suicide (Pierce). Regardless of whether we like it or not, but Nietzsche's philosophy corresponds to the laws of nature, therefore we can talk about as such that contains truth: 1) there is no equality among people and among races, 2) some races represent the dead end of evolution and they need to be treated accordingly, 3) the empirical value of individual corresponds to the rate of his IQ. In its turn, individuals high IQ implies that he is unaffected by moral prejudices, 4) only those people are worthy of living who have a strong will to live, 5) there is no need to look for non-existent God up in the skies instead people should be looking for the God within, 6) whatever goes along with the laws of nature is good, whatever contradicts them is bad, 7) slavery is not a social but biological phenomenon many people are born with atrophied sense of freedom, which is why they need to be referred to as slaves by calling and which is the reason why there is not even a single example in the history of slaves being able to gain freedom with the mean of uprising, 8) those religions that encourage people to choose in favor of anti-social mode of existence need to be outlawed, with priests being forced to do something useful, for a change, like handling manure at the farm, 9) only nations biological elite is qualified for the position of political power, 10) the establishment of political utopias, based on the notion of equality, such as communism or multicultural paradise, is impossible in principle, because it would result in society being plunged into the state of energetic entropy, which in its turn, would unable any further scientific or cultural progress, 11) biological degeneracy is behind the creation of degenerative political doctrines; therefore, the best way to deal with psychologically inadequate politicians is calling an ambulance, rather then becoming involved in argument, 12) the naked force will always be able to find a socially acceptable form, but not the other way around, 13) physical beauty, intellect and health derive out of each other, therefore we cannot discuss them separately, 13) the purpose of states existence is not in reconciling citizens existential inconsistencies, but in creating preconditions for as many people as possible to be able to realize their destiny, within the context of evolution progress. Nietzsche discusses conventional morality as something that is meant to conceal the existential inadequacy of people who are being ashamed of their natural instincts.
The perfect individual exists beyond good and evil, as notions of traditional morality simply cannot be applied to him. His very essence emanates existential virtues. If we look at the history, it will appear that cultural and scientific progress was being pushed forward by people who even now are being often referred to as immoral. Such individuals as Kortes or Pizarro were only concerned about finding gold, at the time when they were discovering the whole new civilizations in America. Napoleon was able to benefit humanity immensely by ending the era of feudalism in Europe, despite the fact that he could be hardly referred to as philanthropic person.
Hitler was able to unite Europe for the first time in history, which allowed it to withstand the onslaught of barbarians from the East in 1945. Hitlers approach towards uniting the Europe is now being exploited by EUs politicians. The man who enabled American astronauts to walk on the Moon, Werner von Braun, in Nazi Germany had a rank of SS Sturmbanfuehrer. We can only agree with Nietzsche when he suggests that it is the notions of courage, will to power and intellectual integrity that define the essence of Western civilization and not the notions of compassion, kindness and spiritual masochism.
There are still many tribes in Africa, Australia and South America that were never able to advance beyond the Stone Age. The activities of members of these tribes consist of eating cockroaches and indulging in sex with each other. Their vocabulary is usually limited to 50 words. The apologists of conventional morality in Western countries refer to the value of such people as being the same as the value of some Harvard professor, for example, who is capable of operating with purely abstract categories at ease. One does not have to be a genius to understand the sheer absurdity of such suggestion. Yet, the metaphysical insanity, which derives out of spirit of Christianity and which confirms the validity of such statement, serves as foundation, upon which socio-political policies in Western countries are based.
Nietzsche was not bounded by considerations of political correctness, which is the reason why his ideas sound fresh and original even today, when the notion of tolerance is being showed up peoples throats, against their will. The irony lies in the fact that it is Christianity that is now being associated with tolerance, despite the fact that the number of Inquisitions victims alone is estimated to be at least 15 million. At the same time, Nietzsche is commonly being regarded as fascist, sexist and male chauvinist, even though that the soundness of his conclusions has been proven by objective reality long ago. We can refer to Nietzsche, as the last great philosopher, because no thinker, after his death, was able to influence peoples minds to such an extent as he did.
Basically, the existential philosophy of twentieth century is nothing but a reflection of peoples inability to think of themselves as such that have biological destiny. Nietzsche strived to promote the concept of super-man, which is why he also needed to design the basics of morality that will be embraced by the race of future super-people, who would be keeping the contemporary humanity in the same regard as we keep apes. However, before such morality could be designed, the old Semitic ethics, which still affect the lives of great many people, would have to be completely deprived of its credibility. Nietzsche dedicated his whole life for doing this, which is why he will go down in history as one of great intellectual revolutionaries. Bibliography: Pierce, William Zimbabwe: Liberal Consequences. 2000.
The National Alliance. 13 May 2008. web Nietzsche, Friedrich On the Genealogy of Morals. 1887. 2001. Malaspina University-College. 13 May 2008. web Nietzsche, Friedrich The Antichrist. 1895. 2005. Friedrich Nietzsche Society. 13 May 2008. web
Free research essays on topics related to: good and evil, conventional morality, christian morality, friedrich nietzsche, laws of nature
Research essay sample on Laws Of Nature Good And Evil
