Example research essay topic: Equality And Discrimination Justice - 1,156 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Equality and Discrimination Justice (1) When it comes to discussing the issues of equality and discrimination in justice, people who were able to retain their ability of critical thinking, despite political correctness being showed up their throats, cannot help but to wonder why these issues did not stir quite as much controversy, as they do now, even as recent as forty years ago? Why legal system, adopted in Western countries, used to be considered as very effective, before the policy of multiculturalism began to undermine the integrity of these countries? This question is largely rhetorical, because the answer is obvious the legal system in Anglo-Saxon countries is based in British Common Law. In its turn, this law was meant to be applied in racially homogeneous societies, which Western countries used to be, before they opened doors to the hordes of immigrants from Third World. It is not a coincidence that so-called civil rights movement started to gain momentum in sixties, when American immigration policy was being revised, in order to bring more color to this country. Therefore, it was quite logical; on the part of people who were preoccupied with celebration of diversity, while relying on welfare checks, as source of income, to begin complaining about the repressive essence of American legal system.

The hysteria over violation of civil rights by police officers, when they arrest Blacks and Hispanics, was being brought to its logical conclusion nowadays. In 1992, during racial riots in Los Angeles, police officers preferred not to get involved, even when crowds of Blacks were beating up White bystanders to death. We need to understand that it is in the very essence of American justice system to be referred to as biased, because it was never designed to be tolerant in the first place. The purpose of our legal system was to provide a fair trial to a suspect and to insure that he will pay for his or her crimes, if found guilty. It is not systems fault that the notions of multiculturalism simply do not correspond to the objective reality. We are being told that peoples racial affiliation does not define their social attitudes; yet, our own eyes tell us that this is not the case.

According to statistics, 85 % of jail population in America consists of Blacks, while they constitute only 16 % of American population. This points out to the fact that Blacks have a racial inclination towards crime, whether we like or not. It explains the fact why every third African-American will spend time in jail, by the time he reaches thirty. This creates a situation when statistical data, in regards to crime, is not being advertised, because it can serve a best proof of sheer absurdity of politically correct notions. We are being told police should drop racial profiling, as method of investigation, as discriminative practice that undermines equality. In other words, cops should be encouraged to have a racial quota for arrests.

For example, they will not arrest more Black criminals then they are allowed to, because otherwise they will be accused of racial profiling. Only a very naive person can believe that such practice could be beneficial to society. Racial profiling is nothing but a generalization, which is based on the long-term observation of behavioral trends, within ethnic or cultural group. It simply makes more sense to suspect in drug dealing a young Latino male, who drives Porsche in the middle of night, then an elderly White woman that tries to get to the Church on Sunday morning.

In his article Troublemakers, Malcolm Gladwell shows that stereotyping has logical properties, by using pit bulls as an example: Of course, not all pit bulls are dangerous. Most dont bite anyone. When we say that pit bulls are dangerous, we are making a generalization, just as insurance companies use generalizations when they charge young men more for car insurance then the rest of us (Gladwell). For as long as Western legal system is based on the notions of logic, stereotyping and racial profiling will continue to take place, as a part of legal practices, whether insane pushers of left-wing agenda like it or not. Therefore, it simply does not make sense to even discuss the issue of discrimination in justice system, because it is wrong to strive to eliminate the problem while addressing its consequences, instead of going after problems roots. If we want to insure that no instances of discrimination will ever take place, during legal proceedings, we would have either to send representatives of racial minorities to where they came from, or to adopt entirely new principles, upon which our legal system is to be built.

It is very unlikely that either of these approaches to solving the problem of discrimination in justice will ever be considered. We can say that the notion of justice is incompatible with the ideals of multicultural paradise, which our Liberals insist on building. (2) There are certain notions that will be deleted from the vocabulary of progressive individual: beauty, intelligence, ugliness and justice. Only word discrimination will be allowed to exist, because chanting of it for long enough is associated with prospects of monetary profit. The reason why lawyers who used to defend O. J. Simpson were being paid $ 500 an hour, is because they never got tired of repeating discrimination over and over, until judges grew weary of listening to it and declared murderer as not guilty.

Of course, it is not just representatives of racial minorities that are being constantly discriminated, but also gays, lesbians and Jews. Therefore, it is very doubtful whether these fine people are going to benefit from complete elimination of discrimination and badness, as they will be left without the source of income, as result. What are they going to discuss, while drinking organic coffee in Starbucks? Who is going to refer to them as role models, if there will be no issues left to whine about? It appears that, in order for the equality to become an integral part of legal proceedings in this country, the assumption that some people are underprivileged, simply because of color of their skin, needs to be dropped altogether. Otherwise, we will continue to deal with a situation when, if we paraphrase George Orwell all people are equal, but some of them are more equal then others.

That is, of course, if the issue of eliminating discrimination in justice system is not being used as tool of pushing a certain political agenda, on the part of people who take advantage of citizens naivety. Bibliography: Gladwell, Malcolm Troublemakers. 6 Feb. 2006. The New Yorker. 16 Dec. 2007. web An Overdue Step for Equal Justice. 9 Nov. 2007. The New York Times. 16 Dec. 2007. web Understanding Discrimination against African-Americans. 2007.

North Carolina Wesleyan College. 16 Dec. 2007. web Abstract: This paper discusses the issue of equality and discrimination in legal system. Outline: Part one Part two

Research essay sample on Equality And Discrimination Justice