NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
U. S. Court System (1) In his article Racially Biased Justice Still Infects American Courtrooms, Jesse Jackson argues that American legal system is biased towards representatives of racial minorities. He describes the incident at Jena High School, when six Black students were charged with aggravated assault, after they crippled up a White youth, who they suspected of being a racist. Apparently, there was a tree at Jena's High schoolyard, which was traditionally referred to as white tree, because of its unusual color. The parents of Black students began to complain about it, as they considered it as the proof that subtle racism exists in the school.
While hoping for some kind of money compensation, in return for their willingness to forget about facts of outrageous racism in Jena High, these parents threatened to demand white tree to be cut down. The next day there were three nooses hanging from the tree, which instantly reminded Black students that they live in the state where Ku-Klux Klan used to be very popular, back in the days. Six Black teenagers, who are known as members of gang, took revenge on the innocent White student, who simply happened to be in the wrong place in wrong time and who did not have anything to do with this prank. As the result, they all were arrested.
Jesse Jackson suggests that attackers should be let free and that the White youth, who sustained life-threatening injuries, needs to be arrested instead. He thinks of schools prank as hate crime, while referring to aggravated assault, on the part of Black students, as appropriate response. Jesse Jackson concludes his article: Across this country, there are two justice systems one for blacks and one for whites. Black (and Latino) young men are not more likely to commit crimes than whites. But they are more likely to be stopped by police, more likely to be arrested if stopped, more likely to be charged if arrested, more likely to be jailed if convicted, more likely to be charged with felonies, and more likely to be tried and imprisoned as adults (Jackson). I personally think of Jacksons article as such that is absolutely deprived of any sense of logic.
It is only hard evidence that American Courts take into consideration, when it comes to sentencing. The fact is that Black gangsta students admitted of beating up White student. They did not even stop kicking him, while he was laying unconscious on the ground. As a result, he will remain crippled up for the rest of his life. However, Jackson thinks that Jena's Six being charged with an aggravated assault constitutes great injustice.
He goes as far as to suggest that people of color are not capable of committing crime in the first place and that it is American Justice systems racial badness that explains the fact why one out of three African-Americans have had spent some time in jail, according to statistics. This, of course, is outrageous statement. Jesse Jackson is nothing but fully legalized extortionist, who plays racial card to push his personal agenda. Nevertheless, we can agree with Jackson that our justice system is highly ineffective, because otherwise, people like him would be kept in jail, instead of being allowed to spread racial hatred across the country. There are many questions left unanswered in Jacksons article. For example, he does not explain on what grounds Jena's County Court must reconsider its decision to charge six Black youths with aggravated assault, although his logic is quite understandable.
According to author, they simply need to be let free, because the color of their skin. Apparently, Jackson promotes the concept of reverse racism and he thinks that there is nothing wrong about it. If Blacks do not like being charged with crimes, they should simply adjust their behavior and stop thinking that the whole world owes them, because their ancestors used to be slaves. There can be no doubt that Jacksons article is biased. He throws accusations of racism at will against anyone who would disagree with his outrageous claims. This point out to the fact that the effectiveness of American Justice system is being continuously undermined by the policy of multiculturalism, which hawks of political correctness enforce upon the society. (2) In her article Biased Family Court System Hurts Mothers, Garland Waller suggests that it is practically impossible for the mothers to get custody of a child, during divorce procedures.
According to Waller, this is because the majority of judges in American civil courts are males. Author thinks of it as something unnatural, because These judges decide, time and time again, when a woman raises the allegation of sexual abuse in a custody dispute, that it is she who will lose her children forever (Waller). She thinks that allegations of sexual abuse, on the part of women, do not need to be investigated at all and that judges must automatically give the custody of children to mothers, once they claim that they have been sexually abused by their former husbands. Waller describes her experience of communicating with women that have been stripped of their parental rights as generally positive: I have met many honest, caring and courageous mothers who, for speaking the truth, have been publicly called crazy, hysterical and delusional, and labeled with all kinds of pseudo-disorders (Waller). It appears that the reason for this is the fact that author herself is not entirely normal.
The feminist line, in her article, can be easily identified, which is its turn, suggests that Waller's stance is actually biased. This undermines the validity of authors claims. If we agree with her line of arguments, we would have to conclude that women simply could not be diagnosed with mental disorders. In fact, there would be no need to bring the issue of child custody to the courts, because women would be placed above legal proceedings, on the basis of their gender affiliation.
I personally do not agree with Waller. Fortunately, American social policies are based on the notion of gender equality. Therefore, women can be stripped of their parental rights just as easily as men, after it is being proven in the court that they are unfit for the role of mothers. The practice suggests that it is women that often take the advantage of American legal system. Men are required to pay ali monies, no matter what, under the threat of being put in jail.
Women, on the other hand, are only required to pay ali monies if they have a job. If there is an injustice, in American civil courts, it is directed against men, because they are automatically assumed of being sexual abusers deep inside. Thus, we cannot think of Waller's arguments, outside the context of political correctness, which begins to affect legal proceedings more and more. It deprives the legal process of its objectivity and, therefore, cannot be tolerated.
It goes without saying that Waller left many questions unanswered in her article. For example, she does not clarify whether she actually suggests that child custody cases need to be handled by female jurors exclusively. It is quite natural for the readers to come to this conclusion, after having read her article. If Waller stated this openly, her arguments would not be taken seriously. However, she strives to prepare readers to this thought, as something that makes sense.
Author writes her article from the position of feminist, while assuming that her line of arguments must universally appeal to everybody. This, of course, is not the case, because there are still people in this country that Liberal Medias failed to brainwash. Our legal system is based upon Roman law and this is exactly the reason why it remained effective, until the time when people began to doubt the validity of American legal heritage. Ideally, it should not matter whether particular judge is a representative of minorities or whether he has penis or not. Waller tries to convince readers otherwise, which reveals her as someone who simply pushes its own agenda, in the very same manner as Jesse Jackson does. Thus, Waller's point of view needs to brushed aside, because she simply does not understand the essence of the foundations that our legal system is based upon.
Bibliography: Jackson, J. Racially Biased Justice Still Infects American Courtrooms. September 18, 2007. Common Dreams News Center.
Retrieved October 4, 2007 from web Waller, G. Biased Family Court System Hurts Mothers. April 5, 2001. Womens News. Retrieved October 4, 2007 from web
Free research essays on topics related to: sexual abuse, racially biased, jesse jackson, american legal system, aggravated assault
Research essay sample on American Legal System Racially Biased
