NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... For as long as people share the same territory, their interests will always be coming into conflict. We can only strive to reduce the negative aspects of discontent among people. For example, the economic stability is being accomplished in China, where citizens cannot expect to get paid more than 10 dollars a day, unless they are high ranking party officials. Because of this stability, every Chinese has only one dream to leave his country for good, no matter where. In their turn, Chinese nationals are increasing the levels of political instability in countries where they immigrate, because they do not assimilate into the host society, while preferring to form their own society within a society.
There is also stability in Somalia. People there had been stably suffering from famine, ever since this country gained independence. I doubt whether average Somalian will agree that this kind of stability is beneficial for him. It is a pure nonsense to suggest that non-governmental entities can solve local and regional conflicts, unless they are militia or paramilitary organizations, because only this type of organizations possesses authority in zones of conflict. The political authority comes out of guns muzzle. However, there is only one step from considering militia being a terrorist group.
As saying goes one mans terrorist is another mans fighter for freedom. Nelson Mandela, for example, had participated in 15 attacks on South-African officials that resulted in death of 23 innocent bystanders. Nevertheless, he is now being referred to as fighter for civil rights. It appears that only the non-governmental entities that we can consider as being progressive, are those that fully support U. S.
geopolitical aspirations, being on the payroll of Department of Foreign Affairs. We support the most gruesome tyrannies in the world, as Saudi Arabia. The Al-Queda is also non-governmental entity, which was being created by CIA during Afghan war. It did solve the regional conflict in this part of the world, but it was being accomplished with the mean of killing the opponents, rather then by participation in negotiations. There were numerous attempts, on the part of non-governmental organizations, to mediate in peace talks between Israel and Palestinians, but all of these attempts had failed miserably. It is only a complete physical elimination of whether Israelis or Palestinians that can bring peace to this region.
Maintaining a global coalition in fight against terrorism is based on wishful thinking, at best. It is a job of diplomats to talk about it at receptions, while drinking wine that often cost $ 2000 a bottle. Coalition can only be maintained when participants get continuously reaffirmed that their cooperation enables them to accomplish some progress. This is not the case when it comes to coordinating countries efforts to combat terror. Jeremy Brecher in his article Let's Join, Not Fight, the Global Coalition Against War in Iraq makes a perfectly good point: We need to start reversing the many other unilateralist policies that divide us from the global coalition.
Take, for example, the war on terror. Our government is now telling us that -- despite our supposedly victorious war in Afghanistan -- we are no safer from terrorist attacks than we were on the eve of 9 / 11. But the idea that we could defeat terrorism from 20, 000 feet in the air was absurd from the start. We might as well have bombed the Washington, DC metropolitan area to stop the sniper attacks (Brecher). As we progress towards Globalization, the practice of terrorism is likely to gain more appeal among marginalized elements in society.
This is because engaging in terrorism is often only the option for these people to make themselves heard. Rich and powerful live in their own world; which has nothing to do with the realities of ordinary peoples living. At the same time, they are afraid of death, just like everybody else, while not being bulletproof. This is why they are best reasoned with guns. As famous saying goes kind word and a gun are always better than simply a kind word alone. In Global world people will be less and less able to influence the political process, by participating in elections.
Even now the outcome of elections in many countries is being predetermined, before they begin, because only those candidates win, who can spend the biggest amount of money on election campaign. In future, votes are going to be simply bought legally. However, as history shows, the richest people are not always able to provide effective leadership. This is why, the role of terrorism in future might be evaluated from different prospective than how we do it now. In order for the countries diplomatic efforts to fight terrorism to be effective, they would have to proclaim that they would refrain from deploying terrorist practices themselves. For example, Israel would have to condemn its own practice of political assassinations of people that are being considered dangerous to this state.
The international laws are being simply ignored by this little state that posses 200 nuclear warheads and enjoys American undisputed support to intimidate its neighbors. Such intimidation is rightly considered by many, as form of ideological terrorism, which no civilized country would ever deploy. Therefore we can talk all we want about applying effort to engage communities in a dialogue, but it will lead us nowhere, because it is nothing but politically-correct rhetoric, which is simply a set of standard phrases that do not carry any semantic meaning. Such rhetoric was very popular before the outbreaks of WWI and WWII. In each case, people were being told that the era of universal peace and tolerance is just around the corner.
Then, they were being told that they were going to be sent to war, to defend democracy, serving as cannon meat. History repeats itself once again. Once again we have a countless experts and consultants who make careers on peoples naivety; because they were able to convince them that politically-correct terminology contains message of peace. But the truth is - the more we talk about evils of terrorism, without pointing out to concrete instigators, the more there are going to be outbreaks of violence in the world. Liberal yuppies, who would not be able to physically survive without drinking an organic coffee at Starbucks, on daily basis, are now telling us what should be done to reduce level of violence in the world. Here is a good example of their mental depravity - these yellow-bellied commies seriously think that, in order to fight terrorism, we must: hold international symposiums and conferences on radicalization and extremism.
They tell us that we must strive to contain radicalization and extremism regardless where its found. The radicalization is usually found where people are being mercilessly exploited by transnational corporations, or where children are being shot on the street in broad day light, solemnly for the sake of Israeli soldiers amusement, or where these children are being branded as terrorists for throwing rocks at aggressors. Thus, lets us hold symposiums, so that era of never ending peace would begin at last! It is the fact that America is being hated throughout the world like never before, even by countries that used to revere our nation, up until recently.
I think we need to ask ourselves why? Partially, the answer becomes self-evident, after we get to hear a Liberal rhetoric for long enough. Today our country depends largely on our supreme technology, when it comes to providing security to its citizens, yet this technology has a very nasty characteristic it tends to spread among nations that now are being made enemies, because of our wise foreign policy. We, as Americans, need to have the courage and determination to fight terrorism when it comes to our homeland. However, yet we are also need to be smart and try to eliminate the roots of international terrorism rather than fighting with its consequences, as we have been doing so far. America needs to fully withdraw its support of Israel - it is not our business trying to bring peace to that region.
The bloody bacchanalia had never stopped there since the state of Israel was being founded and it is not likely to stop, before one side or another is being physically eliminated. This tiny country boldly ignores UN resolutions, while being backed by USA that is the main cause of international tension in the world. Also, we need to withdraw our troops from Iraq or to just simply occupy this country and impose our own rules, without regards to democracy and similar nonsense. Victors are not judged. We cannot play in democracy at the expense of lives of our soldiers there. The time has come for America to realize that we all live in twenty first century and our every act on international arena will have an impact on our own country.
Bombing people into a Stone Age and then dropping them food parcels from the planes will never make America more popular among other nations of the Earth. And the finally we need to change our immigration policy. There are enough hard-working people in Europe, who will prosper within a few years, after coming to U. S.
Instead we bring welfare recipients from Third World countries that come here to exploit this country rather than to benefit it. This would not be so bad, but some of them are committed to causing intentional harm to our society, because they hate America. They are the ones who engage in terrorist activities, while we are being spiritually disarmed by the fact that were are expected to understand and respect cultures and religions. It is newly arrived immigrants that need to learn how respect our culture and customs, instead of start demanding special rights and privileges, after setting foot in America. In order for us to be able to deal with the threat of international terrorism, our society must get back to sanity. Otherwise, we will lose this fight, even before it begins.
We must be just as committed to bringing terrorists to justice as they are committed to causing us harm. The first step will be exposing Liberal lies for what they are. This paper can be considered as part of this process. Bibliography: Abdelhadi, B. Criticism of Globalization: Positive and Negative Aspects. 2005. ISESCO New Headquarters.
Retrieved March 30, 2007 from web Abuse, Z. Jemaah Islamic Still a Potent Force for Violence in Southeast Asia. March 27, 2007. Global Terrorism Analysis.
Jamestown. Org. Retrieved March 30, 2007 from web Atlas, J. Among the Lost: Illusions of Immortality. October 7, 2001. The New York Times.
Retrieved March 30, 2007 from web Brecher, J. Let's Join, Not Fight, the Global Coalition Against War in Iraq. November 19, 2002. News Center.
Common Dreams. Org. Retrieved March 30, 2007 from web Glasser, S. U. S. Figures Show Sharp Global Rise In Terrorism.
April 27, 2005. Washington Post. Com. Retrieved March 30, 2007 from web Kohler, H. Philosophical Aspects of Globalization. 2000. I.
P. O. Research Papers. HansKoechler. Com. Retrieved March 30, 2007 from web Pierce, W.
Our Revolutionary Right July, 1999. Free Speech. National Alliance Site. Retrieved March 30, 2007 from web Thomas Jefferson. 2007. Quotes From All. Com.
Retrieved March 30, 2007 from web See, T. Lets Face It America - We Are Fighting World War III. January 8, 2004. American Daily.
Com. Retrieved March 30, 2007 from web Shirt, G. Our Basic Instincts Were Sound. February 1, 2004. Los Angeles Times.
Retrieved March 30, 2007 from web Outline: Globalization and terrorism. Pp. 1 - 3 How to deal with the threat of terrorism. Pp. 3 - 9 Conclusion. P. 10
Free research essays on topics related to: war in iraq, fight terrorism, international terrorism, politically correct, negative aspects
Research essay sample on War In Iraq Fight Terrorism
