NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
What is the Meaning of Human Freedom In 19 th century Christianity has entered the time of its irreversible decline, because numerous scientific discoveries had proven the sheer absurdity of this doctrine. This is why the feeling of psychological discomfort, caused by the fact that there was no solid ground to base their faith upon, was widely spread out among many philosophers and writers. Fyodor Dostoevsky and John Mill were such individuals. Their vision of human freedom was affected by both: their idealism and their supreme ability to operate with highly abstract categories. In fact, the spiritual foundation of Western civilization is based upon these two principles.
European thinkers of the time did not doubt the universal value of freedom; however, they were also aware that such freedom often backfires, in social context of this word. It was slowly beginning to dawn on them that somehow the concept of freedom was closely related to the idea of equality. Still, while they were able to easily define the essence of freedom, the idea of equality posed many problematic questions. Dostoevsky and Mill were suspecting that social equality is a myth, because it could not be observed empirically. Slowly but surely, they both were starting to realize that the idea of equality has biological rather than social nature, this is why freedom turns into the tyranny in societies, where biological quality of people is being continuously undermined by degenerative social and religious doctrines, like Christianity. Dostoevsky sees human freedom as agony, because the majority of people are simply unable to understand that freedom of choice carry numerous responsibilities and usually produces disappointment rather then happiness.
This is why ignorance is bliss. Christ could not make even a single person happy (all his closest associates suffered and died), while Christian religion provides people with psychological comfort, which is based on ignorance. Mill refers to democracy as tyranny of majority, because crowd always chooses in favor of immediate gratification, which turns out to be destructive, in the long run. Tyranny can exist in form of democracy but no other way around.
Society cannot provide freedom of expression by the mean of legislative act, because such act will not affect peoples genetic predetermination. The freedom of expression is guaranteed by Chinese constitution, for example, yet, average Chinese thinks of openly expressing his views as something absolutely insane, especially given the fact that he does not even have any views, in the first place. There are no racial prejudices. Racial stereotyping is not irrational, as we are being told now, but comes as the result of long term observations over large group of people. It is the suppressing of peoples natural responses to the objective reality that can be referred to as assault on freedom. Therefore, freedom is something opposite to political-correctness, which can be thought of as one of the most pathetic attempts to build a social utopia, along with Communism and Christianity.
Every social, political or philosophical problem is best addressed to, when we take into account peoples racial affiliation. There can be equality, but only among those who are truly equal. The freedom can only be enjoyed by those who understand what this terms stands for. People that become religious converts are simply unable to benefit from freedom, because they take pleasure in being spiritually enslaved. This is why slaves are born and not made. Modern Feminism is an illegitimate child of Liberalism and as such, it cannot be seriously considered as credible social doctrine.
In fact, no political of philosophical doctrine can benefit humankind, for as long as it is based on denying the laws of nature. Therefore, Feminism might require us to rethink our views on great deal of things, but it is simply not going to happen. It is important to understand the true essence of Feminism, which is nothing but social consequence of hormonal irregularity, inside of womens bodies. The concepts of freedom and Feminism have nothing in common, just as Liberalism has nothing to do with tolerance. In order to realize the validity of this statement, one only has to make a sexist comment, while being surrounded by progressive women. The chances are that he will be strangled for the lack of tolerance, on his part.
Bibliography: 1. Gould, James and Mulvaney, Robert. Classical Philosophical Questions. 12 th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2007.
Free research essays on topics related to: philosophical, human freedom, idea of equality, feminism, freedom of expression
Research essay sample on Idea Of Equality Freedom Of Expression
