NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Iraq War It seems that our world has lost rational reference points of development. Shift in national priorities that balanced foreign affairs in the modern world took place with the beginning of active phase of U. S. war against Iraq. Undoubtedly, the modern world faced the most serious crisis of political system. From the middle of 80 s politicians started to notice that the United States incline to the authoritative methods of government and command-administrative methods of problem solving.
It resulted in changes in configuration of U. S. political system per sample one-party system with superstructure consisting of two corporate groups: Democratic and Republican. Both of them are aimed to solve the same socio-economic task. Both of them have intention to secure control in the country. In its turn, this intention resulted in political machinations concerning general elections.
The belief in supreme value of Western Democracy the freedom in electing was undermined. The ruling circles of the United States of America used the method that is notable for no newness: introducing an order in a separate country, Iraq, as though it imposes a threat to national interests of America. Such method is a peculiar feature of authoritatively oriented political systems. As a result, the nation faces a complicated problem of global crisis. It is important to understand that the problem of Iraq to a great extent should be examined as a problem of future existence of the world society in general. The conflict created by Americas intervention in Iraq's affairs is the challenge to poly-ethical world, fair problem solving of modern economic, social and ecological development of countries and nations.
The paper argues that Iraq is a reflection of the processes of globalization. It is very difficult to find a proper solution for Iraq issue. The issue of war and peace in the modern world depends mainly on political leaders involved in military and political conflict with Iraq. It is necessary to use institutions and organizations like UNO and its institutions that bear responsibility for solving international conflicts and problems. The analysis of Iraq war shows that the UNO faces crisis.
UNO is not able to exploit its potentialities. On the other hand, it is obvious that Americas position concerning the Iraq issue witnesses of increasing weakness rather than of its almighty power. The U. S.
government is unable to solve the issue of national interests assurance, control over the armament and weapons of mass destruction beyond its borders using appropriate civilized methods. In these circumstances world community has to realize all intensity of threat that results from this weakness of the most influential superstate that is unable to cope with internal threats and external challenges. The events of September 11, 2001 and war hysteria concerning Iraq and other governments announced the marginals of the world community demand proper evaluation from side of world community, politicians, scholars, public organizations and appropriate mutually binding political solution. The absence of open social and political dialogue with representatives of other political poles of the modern world is one of the most important problems of the modern stage of development of American political establishment. It is easy to understand that in order to start the dialogue the U. S.
should acknowledge presence of these political poles. The matter concerns such countries like France, Germany, Russia, etc. In practice it implies the refusal from one-sided decision making concerning military, economical and political issues of the world development. Yet, it is difficult to discover the attempt to follow this direction in activity of American government. It seems that the government convinced itself in execution of certain supreme mission, as far as Iraq war is often referred to attempts by force to find weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons, and to stop these being passed to terrorist organizations (Mcmillan 2). Yet, such attitude should remain in the past.
America became a hostage of its own ideology and started to destruct the remains of windmills former military presence of the former USSR abroad. Otherwise it is difficult to find explanation for predication of the U. S. in relation to Iraq in conditions when many issues concerning the control over the weapons of mass destruction are solved and transparency of presumably existing large-scale threat is evident. What concerns security cooperation between Central Asia and America, Elizabeth Wishnick (2004) claims that Iraq war introduced new complications and revealed inconsistencies in the U. S.
approach to regional security (p. 1). America focused attention on Central Asian regions and, indirectly, forced other countries like China, Russia and India to enter the struggle for spheres of influence more overtly. Besides, concerned about the implications of the U. S. interest in regime change for their own rule, Central Asian leaders now have an added incentive to overstate terrorist threats facing their countries, while justifying the persecution of any political opposition and peaceful religious activity (Wishnick 1).
Nowadays we can try to give proper estimate of opinions expressed by political leaders in the beginning of military actions against Saddam Hussein. Lets remember the words of Hungarian Prime Minister Peter Medieshi, one of the politicians who signed the petition that supported the U. S. position. He said that our world became more calm and peaceful than it was before the Iraq war. According to him, the main task of the governments is to put an end to the Iraq war as soon as possible.
At the same time the war should reach its aim. Europe and America should bear responsibility to stop the terrorism. However, you can't fight facts that military actions of America in Iraq supported by several European countries made world neither calm nor peaceful. The unjust regime as part of the war on terror (Millen 133) cannot be ethically justified. Billions of people do not acknowledge the United States as a guarantee of peace. For example, Islam world adheres to position that since the time Pakistan created nuclear bomb, people of Islamic countries started to sleep calm.
Islam got the weapon of containment. Until very recent times we could claim that our world has a kind of peaceful co-existence of the countries with different confessions. However, serious threat to this peaceful co-existence took place simultaneously with the problem of global threat and increase of interest from the side of national governments concerning creation of its own (nuclear) weapon. The theory of nuclear weapon as a weapon of containment captivated the bounders of religious confrontation: Israel (Judaism) Pakistan (Islam) India (Hinduism). World history gives us examples of danger of this kind of religious confrontation. Meanwhile, the U.
S. bases on the concept of threat of international terrorism and examines Iran as the country that supports terrorism. Taking into account hat Teheran carries out its own nuclear energetic program, the U. S. undertake all efforts to change the political system of Iran under excuse of new global threat. In contrast to its strategy in Iraq, the process occurs in result of political processes.
In this relation we have to admit that terrorism is not a military opponent. It is rather an anti-social activity of increased danger. We have to make difference between military victories and victories in the war against terrorism, where can be no effective battles or triumphant victories. In case we do not understand this difference, politicians and militaries of the U. S.
will revel in freedom of one-side actions, and attaching the label of anti-terrorism actions to Iraq war, will continue to push the world towards global conflict. The religious leaders quickly understood what is going on. For example, Christian and Islamic hierarchs unanimously determined the difference between confessional differences of Islam and Christianity from one side, and the war initiated by Christian government against the Islamic one, from the other side. The shift of these theological differences from confessional discussion to the platitude of armed collision results in change of correlation between moral and social components of this process. It is unjust and immoral to use the concept international terrorism that is evidently used to justify the war against a definite government that has definite political and legal status, religious basis and culture. It results in protest in its new, more radical and more dangerous form.
Plenty of scholars adhere to opinion that America is loosing its strong positions in the war against terrorism. Richard Jackson (2004) claims that blinkered by their superior military technology, officials do not appreciate that the real revolution in military affairs has taken place at the level of strategy not technology, and that post-modern wars can no longer be won through the application of superior firepower (p. 8). The issue of war can be solved with no application of superior firepower (p. 8). What are the possible solutions?
Many analysts consider that the country undertakes attempts to build the world in the image and likeness of one country. America tries to create a new world regime that corresponds to no cultural, social, and economical demands of the mankind. Unfortunately, Iraq war became the real manifestation of this tendency that challenges world cultures. It throws down a challenge not only to Islamic but to all other world...
Free research essays on topics related to: nuclear weapon, war against terrorism, iraq war, weapons of mass destruction, difficult to find
Research essay sample on War Against Terrorism Weapons Of Mass Destruction
