Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Order To Find Prime Mover - 1,233 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

This philosophy essay discusses views of Aristotle and Nagarjuna on truth and on knowledge that can be obtained from the truth. Both philosophers are famous for their logic. They both share some views of the world. However, mostly their views are different, since Aristotle is the representative of Western philosophy and Nagarjuna of Buddhist one. Outline Introduction Aristotle Nagarjuna Discussion divide being, truth human psychology human soul perception of virtue Conclusion similarities and differences Perspectives of Aristotle and Nagarjuna About 400 books belong to Aristotle (384 - 322 B. C. ), one of the most famous Greek philosophers and they impress with a variety of topics discussed in them.

Aristotle's works were especially valuable in the areas of ethics, logic, physics, psychology, and rhetoric. However, one thing this philosopher lacked and it was imagination. Aristotle unlike some other ancient philosophers was short of creativity and therefore, in my opinion, for him the change in setting could result into the change of conceptual perception of the world. One of his biggest achievements was the use of logic in conducting different types of researches, which certainly was a key point of his success. Nagarjuna (150 - 250 C. E. ), the founder of the Madhyamika or Middle School, furnished the philosophical basis of Indian Mahayana Buddhism.

His most important work, the Mulamadhyamakakarika (MMK), is a religious text, and as such alms at the understanding of emptiness where verbalization ceases, Nagarjuna consistently undertakes to articulate the notion of emptiness by means of logic. Some features of his argumentation appear to clash with the basic principles of logic, prompting some scholars to find in it the seeds of a special kind of logic which is to be distinguished from that of the Western tradition. In his metaphysics, Aristotle argued for the existence of a divine being, described as the Prime Mover, who will be in charge of the unity and purposefulness of nature. God is perfect and therefore the aspiration of all things in the world, because all things desire to share perfection. Other movers exist as wealth intelligent movers of the planets and stars. According to the Aristotle's assumption, there were 55 or 47.

The Prime Mover, or God, described by Aristotle is not very suitable for religious needs, as many later theologians and philosophers have observed. Aristotle limited his theology, however, to what he believed would be for the needs of science. So, if the Aristotle would hear such a bad news, he definitely will be frustrated what he spent his best years for. Questions as to whether phenomenal events affect the field, whether the manifestations of an adamantine or non-changeable field can be other than deterministic if seen in real-time, and, incidentally, how a wholly virtual or illusory brain contrives to think itself, are rarely addressed by Nagarjuna in contrast to Aristotle.

In our context they are seen as belonging to physics. Nagarjuna addresses the origins of divine being but in Platonic-idealistic terms. The traditional conclusion would no doubt be that extra-dimensional reality, because it is inclusive, cannot be interfaced with any discursive phenomenology. First, for Aristotle the psychology itself was considered the study of the humans sole. In his conceptual framework, form and matter were closely fitted and existed together. Very interesting in my opinion would be to look at the Aristotelian definition of sole, which suggests: kind of functioning of body organized so that it can support vital functions.

He considered that the soul is tightly associated with body denying that a sole is a spiritual entity. Aristotle wrote the book called Nichomachean Ethics which focused on how to obtain happiness. Disquieted with the persona of character that makes one a good person, Aristotle sees the right thing to do as means to accomplishing good character but not as values in themselves. Aristotle refers to these traits as virtues. He describes virtue as a trait of good character coalesced with habitual good action. Aristotle primarily focused on virtue of moderation.

His Doctrine of the Mean holds all virtues exist between two extremes which are excess and deficiency. He believed that moral virtue is a mean between two extremes that is, one involving excess and the other deficiency. This concept of Aristotle later came to be known as the Golden Mean. Aristotle stated out that in order to find the Golden Mean, the two extremes must be identified in order to find equilibrium between the two.

But the mean must occur at the right time towards the right people for the right reason and in the right manner. Aristotle's thinking grant ethical motivation to develop a good character. The good character may result in the production of good actions. Nonetheless, there is no way of distinguishing or even determining the right action. This is something on which Nagarjuna is obscure, or led to take refuge in a kind of cosmic engram which stands behind illusory I-ness which is the reflection of Buddha-nature. Labeling this as Brahman, for example, and then translating Brahman and maya as God and illusion rather than as field and phenomenal reality add further to the confusion, and fuel edifying rather than illuminating interpretations based on what we have traditionally attributed to God.

Buddhists are more consistent than we are if they talk traditionally about reincarnation (in linear time) and the unreality of time and self in the same doctrinal breath, though Nagarjuna saw the point. Such traditions might help us not in being harder-nosed, but in acquiring direct experience of the observer less world, simply to see what such a counterintuitive model would look and feel like. Aristotle's and Nagarjuna's perception of virtue and finding the Mean path in order to live life may seem appealing but the truth is that it is not consistent with human nature and has little relevance to modern life. These ideas deal with ideas of excess and deficiencies that are vague. Once someone said, seeking the middle path between extremes is a good idea, but never experiencing an extreme in itself seems extreme. The vital idea of Aristotle and Confucius is that every normal human being treasures the ambition to become a superior human being that is, superior to ones fellows, if possible, but surely superior to ones own past and present self.

This goal does not mean attaining a perfect state of the self but rather a state of always striving to go beyond my present state. This thought of Nagarjuna has great relevance to the modern way of living. If one cogitates, that one would conclude that every other person on the face of this planet is striving to attain more. I agree with Aristotle and Nagarjuna, that all human beings are constantly engaged in a battle of attaining more success, capital and fame than our colleagues but there are indeed very few who revert to the righteous path to get what they want.

Even though various similarities existed between Aristotle and Nagarjuna on the notion of virtue, however dissimilarities also existed on the ways both men viewed mankind. Aristotle divided men into freeman and slaves. Nagarjuna on the other hand never differentiated between men. He emphasized on equality.

Nagarjuna elucidated humanity to love. This allowed him to provide equal opportunities, education and to carry out teaching activities in dialogue with his disciples. The overall expansion of everyones potential ability consists of the most integral part of Nagarjuna's idea of humanity.


Free research essays on topics related to: good character, virtue, prime mover, order to find, aristotle

Research essay sample on Order To Find Prime Mover

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com