NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Every war brings with it disagreement. With every related event come mixed opinions and emotions. Controversy is a natural part of war. As such it shows its ugly face in the light of our country's most recent war with Iraq. More so than some wars in that we are fighting a it preemptively in hopes to avoid one in the future. If war is eminent, then why not push the hands of fate and run the show our way some may say.
But others feel that by assuming danger is in the near future, and starting a fight rather than responding to an attack, we have become an imperial power in some sense of the word. The leader of Iraq at the time the conflict was initiated was Saddam Hussein. The president of the United States believed (on the backbone of what he thought was very solid intelligence) that Saddam was manufacturing nuclear weapons even after he made an agreement with the US to stop their production back during the gulf war. The question is, do we sit around and wait for this man to complete his project? A man who has clearly stated many times that he despises the US and has no problem showing his hostility towards it. If allowed to continue, Saddam would have to power to destroy millions of lives with the push of the button.
Those weapons in the hand a radical leader such as him, has always been a worry of many nations in past times. Warnings were given to let US weapons inspectors into Saddam's supposed nuclear facilities, but he refused. Is it now morally right to take this man down in assumption that he is hiding these weapons? Some say yes.
He has done it before and he has stated that he will do it again. But what level of force must be used? What amount of military strength must be involved? The war was said to be the fight against terrorism and after the incident on 9 / 11, the need to strike back took over.
President Bush declared war on Iraq. Here is where the disagreement comes in. On one side you have the simple fact that the United States was created on a Christian foundation. Yes all religions and ethnicities are welcome here, but the government was made with morals in mind. For Christianity war can only be evil.
For it is written; 'Thou shall not kill'. Nevertheless, there have always been occasions when Christians have stood up to defend the defenseless and received the praise of the Church of God. And there have always been occasions when war has been the lesser of two evils. Throughout history, there have been occasions when war has been unavoidable. What then can we say about the present looming threat of war between the USA and the UK governments on the one side, and the Iraqi government on the other? It seems to us that before we can make any statement or have any opinion about this possible war, a number of questions have to be asked.
Why is Iraq the country chosen to the subject of our attack? Turkey, which years ago massacred over a million Armenians, then a generation ago illegally invaded Cyprus, and then massacred and expelled many of its Kurdish population, has not had action taken against them by our nation. Israel, which has resisted all UN resolutions against its illegal occupation of Palestinian territory and ethnic cleansing of the native Christian people of Palestine, is also untouched. Albanian Muslims, who have in the last three years desecrated and dynamited some 100 churches and monasteries on the sovereign territory of Serbia, and massacred innocent civilians under the noses of NATO troops, are not threatened with war. Countries like Israel, Pakistan and India, which 'secretly' hold nuclear, biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction are not threatened with war. Why were over three thousand innocent people massacred by Muslim fanatics a year ago in New York?
What inspired such bitter and blind hatred among these deluded people? So why Iraq? Is a war with Iraq the lesser of two evils? In other words, have American satellites, of which dozens must hover over Iraq every day, noticed some terrible, apocalyptic secret weapon in Iraq, which, if unleashed, would cause far greater evil than a war with Iraq?
If so, then it may be that war with Iraq is the lesser of two evils. However, we are not as ordinary members of the public, privy to any such information. The United States is a country divided. Many see things in the Christian light, and also believe we shouldn't be there.
Many different variations accompany that opinion, but all in all it exists with strong influence. Then there is the other side of the fence. Also holding different variations is the opinion that we should be over there fighting for our way of life and defending ourselves and the lives of those in Iraq which are threatened by the presence of such individuals known to us as terrorists. The threat from this country and this man has been proven and so many 'patriotic' persons ask the question, what is the solution if not war?
A very difficult question to answer. Yes something needs to be done about the threat, but those who believe that our men and women don't belong over there are faced with challenge of stating exactly what we SHOULD do. The hardest part of having an opinion is backing it up, especially so in situations such as these. Believers of the war with Iraq say that a mad man such as Saddam must be taken out of power, because he has the potential of becoming another Hitler. That being said, they also believe that any force necessary should be taken to ensure the safety of our country against such individuals. So yet another controversy develops among the present one of the ensuing conflict (phew! ).
Where do we draw the line? Disagreement is part of war. The questions and the arguments can go on for pages and pages. But the basic idea is that people in this country are allowed to voice such opinions. It's called freedom, and the controversy over its existence in the world is a key ingredient.
It's what makes our country great. no sources used.
Free research essays on topics related to: iraq, saddam, massacred, one side, war with iraq
Research essay sample on War With Iraq One Side
