Example research essay topic: Slavery In Greece Rome And Africa - 1,692 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

The issue of slavery has been debated since its early inception. In recent times, there has been considerable debate as to the definition of slavery. Western scholars have attempted to justify slavery of the New World by comparing it to the slavery that existed in Biblical times as well as Greco-Roman and African slavery. Some argue that there can be no international definition of slavery.

Others try to define by a few words that apply to every instance of slavery. The only true way to define slavery is according to each society in which it was based. Websters dictionary defines slavery submission to a dominating influence or the state of a person who is a chattel of another. Though Websters gives this very general definition, there are many other meanings that may come to a persons mind depending on the region of the world that one is speaking of. In Rome, there were different forms of slavery and slavery was not based on any particular thing such as color. Where did these slaves come from?

It has been said that slaves are either born or made. During the Republican period one of the principal sources of slaves had been prisoners of war. There was significant number of Jewish slaves acquired as a result of the crushing of the Jewish rebellion by Vespasian and Titus (AD 66 - 70) The steady expansion in Britain continued to supply British slaves onto the market. Great numbers of prisoners of war reached Rome from the Dacian wars of Trajan. Also, after the Jewish revolt led by Bar-Cochba in AD 132 - 35 an additional number of Jews were sold as slaves. As well as prisoners of war, there were other groups of people who were made slaves.

There were those who were kidnapped and sold into slavery. There were also persons that were made slaves as a result of piracy. This practice was considerably restricted when Pompey crushed the pirates after the passing of the Lex Gabinia in 67 BC. Piracy was also restricted later when the piratical Illyrians were defeated at the conclusion at the battle of Actium in 31 BC. Another source of slaves was purchase from over the boundaries of the empire. Roman soldiers involved in frontier wars and rebellions had many opportunities to buy prisoners of war as slaves at disposal auctions.

Although this is not mentioned in the contemporary literature, this information can be found in papyrus, which reveals that soldiers did indeed own slaves. There were other ways by which slaves were obtained. The sale of offspring by parents was one of the ways that slaves were obtained. This occurred particularly in hard times when parents attempted to ease their burden.

There is evidence that this practice did take place during the first centuries of the empire. However, the practice is unlikely to have been widespread. There are even accounts of how the Frisians in Lower Germany, being subjected to an excessive tribute by the Romans, were forced eventually to sell their wives and children into slavery. This too however, would have been unusual.

In general it is unlikely that even the most impoverished parents, once they had initially resolved to bring up a baby, would sell that baby into servitude - unless there was some very special provocation. A few other methods of enslavement should also be mentioned. The first was self-sale. Hermeros, for example, rather than remain a tribute-paying provincial and hoping subsequently to become a Roman citizen, seems to have sold himself into slavery. A second method was for debt. Here a debtor who was unable to pay could be "given up" (addicts) to his creditor.

A third method was penal enslavement, slavery arising from conviction in law. Punishment for grave crimes could entail the removal of personal rights. The abandonment of infants was widespread over much of the Roman world, and, no doubt, occurred even more frequently whenever circumstances became especially difficult. The custom was not made illegal until AD 374. Abandoned children usually either died or were made slaves. The owners themselves sometimes found the infants, either by accident or design.

At other times they received them from finders who knew of their need. But there are also signs in the papyri of the availability of infants on request. Individuals who were part of the slave trade either collected abandoned babies for later sale themselves or bought them from others who found them. Some of the methods that were used in Greco-Roman slavery were also employed in Africa.

The earliest slaves were captives taken in warfare. Most slaves appear to have been the property of kings, priests, and temples, and only a relatively small proportion were in private possession. They were employed to till the fields and tend the flocks of their royal and priestly masters but otherwise seem to have played little role in economic production, which was mostly left to small farmers, tenants, and sharecroppers and to artisans and journeymen. As in Greco-Roman slavery, slaves were also acquired by the sale, abandonment, or kidnapping of small children. Free persons could sell themselves or, more frequently, their offspring into slavery. They could be enslaved for insolvency, as could be the persons offered by them as pledges.

In the religion of Islam, it was made unlawful for a freeman to sell himself or his children into slavery, and it was no longer permitted for freemen to be enslaved for either debt or crime, as was usual in the Roman world. It became a fundamental principle of Islamic jurisprudence that the natural condition, and therefore the presumed status, of mankind was freedom, just as the basic rule concerning actions is permitted ness: what is not expressly forbidden is permitted; whoever is not known to be a slave is free. This rule was not always strictly observed. In some regions of Africa, slaves were simply victims of kidnapping.

In addition, slaves were also acquired through trading as with the Imbangala. In these instances, people such as the Imbangala did not have to resort to war to obtain slaves. According to Lewis, in the Islam religion, there were basically four ways in which a slave could be obtained: Capture: Capture was a most important source. Frontier warfare and naval raiding yielded some captives, but these were relatively few and were usually exchanged. In later centuries, warfare in Africa or India supplied some slaves by capture to Muslims.

With the spread of Islam, and the acceptance of dhimmi status by increasing numbers of non-Muslims, the possibilities for recruitment by capture were severely restricted. Tribute: Slaves sometimes formed part of the tribute required from vassal states beyond the Islamic frontiers. The king of Nubia signed a treaty that included an annual levy of slaves to be provided from Nubia. The treaty stipulated that hundreds of male and female slaves be delivered annually. This treaty endured for ages but was disrupted when wars broke out between the Muslim rulers of Egypt and the Christian kings of Nubia. Offspring: The attainment of slaves through offspring appears to have been small and insufficient to maintain numbers.

Several factors contributed to this difference. Because of the belief of a mans freedom, slaves were often liberated. Usually this occurred when a slave was freed because she bore her masters child. There were also other reasons for the low natural increase of the slave population in the Islamic world. They include: &# 61623; 1. Castration.

A fair proportion of male slaves were imported as eunuchs and thus precluded from having offspring. Among these were many who otherwise, by the wealth and power which they acquired, might have founded families. &# 61623; 2. Another group of slaves who rose to positions of great power, the military slaves, were normally liberated at some stage in their career, and their offspring were therefore free and not slaves. &# 61623; 3. In general, only the lower orders of slaves -- menial, domestic, and manual workers -- remained in the condition of servitude and transmitted that condition to their descendants. There were not many such descendants -- casual mating was not permitted and marriage was not encouraged. &# 61623; 4. There was a high death toll among all classes of slaves, including great military commanders as well as humble menials.

Slaves came mainly from remote places, and, lacking immunities, died in large numbers from endemic as well as epidemic diseases. Purchase: This became the most important means for the legal acquisition of new slaves. Slaves were purchased from outside, and were then imported into the Islamic nations... In the Roman world, the slave population was occasionally recruited from outside, when a new territory was conquered. However, most slaves came from internal sources. This was not possible in the Islamic empire.

Though enslavement was outlawed, slavery was still legal. This provided for great slave trade. Though there were similarities between Greco-Roman and African slavery, that were differences that must be distinguished. In most cases, slavery systems in Africa were more like indentured servitude. Slaves retained some rights and children born to slaves were generally born free. Slaves could be released from servitude and join a family clan, they were not bound for life, and when set free were not outsiders.

In contrast, Greco-Roman slaves were chattel, or property, who were usually stripped of their rights. The cycle of slavery was perpetual; children of slaves would, by default, also be slaves. There were different classes of slaves, and all were not restricted to servitude for life. A slave could marry, but only by consent of the master. Theoretically, a male slave could marry a free woman, but this was discouraged and in practice prohibited. A master could not marry his own slave woman unless he first freed her.

The rules governing marriage in Rome were similar. There were laws that stated that the sons of senators were not to marry freedwomen. However, it was legal for the women to be taken on as a concubine. In fact, it was more respectable for the senators son to have this woman as a concubine than for the woman to be taken as a wife.

There...

Research essay sample on Slavery In Greece Rome And Africa