NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... sorry for and inconvenience they caused them, answered any questions anyone might have, and then thanked them. None of the subjects reported anything negative about the research they participated in. Article 1: Results Schema theory suggested that the behaviors toward divorce would be caused by the parent's child relationship and would also somehow be the reason for the way a child adjusts during divorce.
But after the research was completed, none of these were supported by the data obtained. The way the adolescents felt about divorce were not cause by the relationship they have with their parents. The learning theory was on the other hand supported, and more importantly so, where the child's mother was concerned. The adolescents who were able to relate with their mothers had a higher chance of adjusting better as opposed to those adolescents who did not relate to their moms.
The relationship the adolescent had with their mother or father had any real effect on the attitudes towards divorce. There was also no support for the adolescent's attitudes about divorce and any relation to the Life Orientation Questionnaire. There was also a regression analysis done to see if the child's behavior toward their mother / father or if the way the child acted towards divorce were any kind of indication of how the child would adjust. It was discovered that the way a child acts towards his or her father / mother was a great indication of how the child was going to adjust, but the child's feelings towards his or her parents had no great effect. But then when a three regression analyses was done, it not only separated the information gained into groups that had similar attitudes about divorce, but it also showed the greatest difference in feelings towards divorce in adolescents who were pretty well adjusted with divorced parents and in adolescents who were adjusted well with married parents. An analyses of variance, also known as ANOVA also showed that ATD scores were greater when a parent that a child could relate to asked for the divorce, as opposed to the parent whom the child could not relate to being the one asking for a divorce.
But then the scores from the ATD test that held the highest scores about being most accepting of divorce were from those participants whose parents had a mutual decision about getting a divorce. No pattern was found, there was nothing out of the norm, and this was so because of the small amount of participants who could not understand their parent that was requesting the divorce, and also a small number of participants whose parents' divorce had been agreed upon by both. For it to be possible to test the importance of learning theory when it comes to talking about the different ways of adjustment, three variables needed to be considered, the nature of the parent's adjustment, they way a child relates to that parents, and the way a child adjusts. The mothers who did not go through any adjustment problems were then separated into the groups where the item and the mother were able to relate to one another.
A study of variance was done to see the differences between these groups. The adolescents whose mothers did not have any problems with adjustments were the ones who scored higher LOQ scores as opposed to the mother who did go through such problems. When mothers had no problems with adjustment, adolescents could relate to their mothers and showed a pattern that was not so great. There were 2 adolescents though who were part of this study and who felt that they could not relate to their mothers. The adolescents who could relate to their mothers had greater LOQ scores as opposed to those who could not relate to their mothers.
There was no pattern found when the father's adjustment was studied. The fathers did not have to deal with adjustment problems, and the had higher LOQ scores then those fathers who did have adjustment problems. There were no big differences in the LOQ scores of those adolescents who were able and unable to relate to their fathers in any of the groups. Out of this sample, 27 of the adolescents were raised mainly by their moms, 8 had been raised by both of their parents, and only 4 were raised by their father only.
Conclusion The purpose of this study, An Analysis of Schema Theory and Learning Theory as Explanations for Variance in Adolescent Adjustment to Divorce was to study schema theory and learning theory. The researchers wanted to see if there was any way to explain the difference in adolescent adjustment to divorce. A lot of the research showed how important the parent child relationship was in regards to adjustment, and this is proven true by the way a child behaves toward his / her mother. The adolescent's behavior toward their mother was a great indication of adjustment.
The way a child interacts with his / her parents was not a factor in how a child acts towards divorce. Also discovered was that the way one feels about divorce did not have any effect on adjustment to divorce. Therefore, the information gathered for this research could not in any way be used as a confirmation to the effect of schema theory to the way an adolescent adjusts to divorce. It was found however, that when the adolescent felt they could relate to the parent who is asking for a divorce, their attitude towards divorce was more accepting as opposed to the adolescent who did not relate to the parent who is asking for divorce. Only six cases in this information given that seemed to fit with the schema theory. There were then only 4 participants who said that divorce had to be a decision made by both parents.
There is no trend where schema theory is concerned, and this indicates that there is not a need to do any more research in this area. The father's adjustment pointed out that there was no obvious pattern, but the mother's adjustment did have a great effect in the way the adolescent adjusted. There were 4 participants who were raised by their father alone, 27 participants who were raised by their mothers alone, and 8 participants who were raised by both. When the father had no big part in the adolescents growing up, it showed that the child's adjustment would not be severely affected.
As the learning theory suggested, the subgroup that had the greatest amount of adjustment was the group of adolescents who had mothers that did not experience adjustment problems, and where the adolescent felt they could relate to the mother. The learning theory also said that the adolescents would duplicate the way their parents adjusted to divorce, and they would also duplicate the parent's behavior because they look at their parent as a role model. The difference found between adolescents who had mothers that did not experience and adjustment problems and felt they could relate to their mothers, and those who were not able to relate to their mothers was not that much greater from one another. There was no great difference because of the fact that there were only 2 participants who fell into this category, and because of this more research is needed in this area.
The purpose of the other research, Assessments of Trust in Intimate Relationships and the Self Perception Process proved that trusting behaviors, whether it comes from one's own self or from their partner is what brings the person to trust their partner more. It was also proven that a person's own trusting actions brought out trust from the actor. This showed that they trusted the actor more because the actor did not know them or how they handled trust. This research also proved that the way a person manages their impressions is a reason to fight with self perception. With the differences between the participants who showed their behaviors after they had been reminded that the results would stay confidential and the participants who not reminded. So therefore, this proves that keeping trusting beliefs was changed in this study.
The mirror manipulation which was meant to increase self awareness and the variable of relationship orientation came up with results no one was anticipating. When trusting behaviors happened in front of a mirror, even greater trusting-behavior effects happened. However, these effects happened with both the actor and the recipient. This research was limited because the sample was made up mainly of U. S. undergrads.
The study could possibly have some signs of being from one specific area. Couples who are distressed are encouraged to make up behavioral contracts to promote a fair trade off in relationships by looking at a partner's actions as opposed to their own. The process shows that the increases in trust was left unknown, however a self perception factor could be part of the reason for how trust develops.
Free research essays on topics related to: learning theory, great effect, divorce, parent child relationship, adjustment
Research essay sample on Parent Child Relationship Learning Theory
