NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
This process is designed to improve job understanding, promote more effective job performance, and establish future goals for career growth. Some goals of the performance appraisals are to provide staff members with feedback on their performance and accomplishments for the previous year. This program should also assist staff members in understanding their job responsibilities and supervisor's performance expectations. Performance goals for the upcoming year and specific plans to help staff members meet those goals should also be established through this process. During each annual appraisal conference the employee and supervisor review the employee's performance during the previous year measured against standards set at the start of the year. Both successes and failures are reviewed.
It is constructive to take the time to understand why certain objectives were successfully achieved and what prevented the successful achievement of other objectives. This review helps to set and achieve new objectives in the year ahead. A key part of the appraisal process is a self-review by the employee, which will allow the employee to review his or her own performance. This can enhance two-way communication between the employee and supervisor. Employees should discuss job expectations, developmental plans, concerns, and areas the employee feels that additional training would be helpful. The supervisor and the employee should discuss the employee's self-review during the appraisal discussion.
If the appraisal discussion is not satisfactory, problems or disagreements should be discussed between the employee and the supervisor. If problems still exist after this process, the employee or supervisor may contact Human Resources for confidential guidance Any employee (s) who have been under the direction of more than one supervisor during the performance review period (for example, an employee who transferred from one department to another) may be evaluated by both the previous and current supervisors. The current supervisor, however, has the primary responsibility for completing the performance appraisal. New employees are in an introductory period for 6 months from their hire date if they are classified staff, or 12 months from their hire date if they are professional staff. At the end of that period, the employee's job performance will be reviewed through the performance appraisal process. If an employee has attained permanent status in their department and receives a special appraisal rating of below expectations or unsatisfactory in accordance with our policy, the rater, with the cooperation of higher level supervisors, shall communicate in writing to the employee necessary for improvements to address the identified deficiencies.
The President or designee may remove the employee from the company if adequate improvement is not made in the employee's performance at any time during the subsequent appraisal period (s) following the initial below expectations or unsatisfactory rating. If an employee's performance has not improved to at least a meets expectations rating within the designated improvement period (s), the company shall initiate action to remove the employee from the designated department. Such action shall be completed within forty-five (45) days of being initiated. Employees are responsible for working with their supervisors to identify and develop agreed upon responsibilities, expectations, performance standards, and areas needing improvement.
Employees are responsible for completing a self-review to assist in the appraisal process. If disagreements arise during the appraisal session, employees are responsible for providing a written explanation of their disagreement that will be attached to the completed appraisal form. Each numeric value has three spaces which allows for the use of "+" or "-" if necessary. Summarize the employee's overall performance along the numeric scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high). An overall assessment of 3 would normally correlate with a rating of 3 or better for most of the measures of effectiveness. However, a rating of 2 on one measure does not necessarily mean that an employee could not be rated a 3 or better overall.
The overall rating should take into account the relative importance of the various measures of effectiveness for effective job performance and be assigned accordingly. Definition of Terms: 1 = Unsatisfactory Performance: Performance is not satisfactory. Performance improvements previously identified (in prior appraisal or during an informal review during current cycle) have not been realized. 2 = Needs Improvements: Performance does not meet expectations. 3 = Meets Expectations: Performance meets expectations. 4 = Exceeds Expectations: Performance exceeds expectations. 5 = Exceptional Performance: Performance exceeds expectations and the employee has demonstrated exceptional accomplishment (s), etc. , such as winning an award.
Free research essays on topics related to: job performance, performance appraisal, employee performance, staff members, previous year
Research essay sample on Employee Performance Performance Appraisal