NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
STATION 1: Fossil 1 displays characteristics of Australopithecus aethiopicus of West Lake Turkana, Kenya. This skull shows the obvious characteristics of a very sharp sagittal crest along the top of the skull, a very wide skull in the cheek area, and an extremely pro gnathic lower skull and jaw area. The cranial capacity also appears to be smaller, suggesting that it is of the earlier hominids. Fossil 2 shows eyebrow ridges and a slight sagittal crest consistent with Homo erectus. The most defining characteristic, however, is the presence of nucl torus, a projection of bone at the back of the skull where muscles are attached to hold the head up, suggesting a consistently bipedal creature. Fossil 3 is a small skull showing no sagittal crest or nucl torus.
There are eyebrow ridges apparent and the face is slightly pro gnathic. The skull most closely resembles the skull like that of the Taung child (Jurmain 203). The skull of the Taung child, a variety known as the gracile australopithecine, or A. africanus, exhibits smaller brain capacity, accounting for the smaller skull.
The fourth fossil has a small skull be conveys the characteristics of Homo sapien, therefore may be a child. At the top of the skull, the bone has not fully come together, consistent with children, and very young Homo sapien. The teeth are very small but are shovel-shaped like modern Homos teeth, adapted to tear and chew softer foods than those eaten by earlier Homo and other hominids. The skull shows little to no prognathism consistent with humans. STATION 2: Fossil 1 at this station showed postorbital constriction, excess bone behind the eyebrows protecting the eyes. The skull showed slight prognathism, which is the protrusion of the jaw and lower skull.
I predicted that the skull was Homo erectus; however, I noted that the African form, Homo easter, characteristically shows postorbital constriction whereas Homo erectus does not. Fossil 2 showed less prognathism, a skull more closely resembling modern Homo. However, the brow ridges present were more pronounced that in modern Homo. The small shovel-shaped teeth also are representative of an early Homo sapien because they ate more cooked vegetation and meat, their teeth were used less for the grinding of hard, brittle vegetation. The fossil most closely displays the characteristics of Cro-Magnon, or Homo sapiens sapiens (Jurmain 281). STATION 3: The first mandible is very robust and shows extreme motorization, the enlargement of premolars to look more like molars in order to chew harder food, such as raw vegetation like many early hominids.
Both characteristics are prominent in Australopithecus robust and A. boise; it is hard to distinguish between the two knowing only the characteristics of the mandible. Fossil 2 has much smaller molars, and shovel shaped incisors suggesting the tearing of softer food. The jaw shape is much more like that of a more modern Homo. The overall reduction of the teeth size but still maintaining the large posterior teeth, or molars, are characteristic of Homo erectus. WORKS CITED Jurmain, Robert, and Lynn Kilgore, Went Trevethan, Harry Nelson, eds.
Essentials of Physical Anthropology: Fifth Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2004.
Free research essays on topics related to: fossil, homo erectus, homo, skull, teeth
Research essay sample on Top Of The Skull Nucl Torus Homo