Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Infected With Hiv Alternatives To Animal - 1,779 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

... C. If humans inhale a small amount of prussic acid fumes it can kill them. However, toads, sheep and hedgehogs can drink it without any harm; Scopolamine can kill humans with a dose of just 5 milligrams. To dogs and cats about 100 milligrams was considered harmless. Information like this can be misleading when scientists try to determine safe damages.

Penicillin, the first antibiotic, was experimented first on mice. Its application on guinea pigs would have entailed dangerous consequences, because penicillin controls the floral bacteria in the stomachs of guinea pigs and destroys them within a few days. The unpredictability of animal testing was thought to have harmful effect in the case of fialuridine. This drug successfully passed its animal test phase without much difficulty. However, when it is administered on fifteen human volunteers it resulted in severe liver damage, causing death to five of them and compelling two others to have liver transplants. The Medical Research Modernization Committee MRMC, an American organization for doctors who are against animal testing, argue that AIDS research in America has been very unproductive.

Animals being infected with HIV were not successful in developing symptoms quite similar to those humans develop when they have AIDS. Over a decade more than 100 chimpanzees have been infected with HIV. But only two have become ill. The same description continues to prescribe that AIDS may have been caused by vivisection, with monkey viruses being mutated to form HIV whist generating a polio vaccine from baboon tissue.

It is definitely true that 15 laboratory workers in the US have been killed by the Marburg virus and other monkey viruses, and that there have been two outbreaks of ebola in the US monkey colonies. (Vivisection: Fact Sheet) Critics continue to argue that animal kept in unnatural conditions, or animals in pain or distress, are not giving rise to accurate or consistent results anyway. Stringent regulations have not eliminated researchers from abusing animals even though such instances are rare. (Alternatives to Animal testing on the Web: FAQs) As a result those against animal testing argue that animal testing should be banned immediately. My Stance: The arguments for and against animal experimentation are going to continue for some time, both between the general public and those directly involved. Those who oppose animal testing believe that all testing associated with the use of laboratory animals should be banned immediately.

However, one could argue by saying that a total ban on the use of animals will prevent a great deal of basic medical research, and the possible production of certain vaccines. No new medicines would develop and the safety of workers, the general public and patients would be at stake. On the other hand, the supporters of animal testing say that humans have always benefited from the health care developments that depended upon the accomplishments of animal research and would continue to benefits from animal testing. However, some argue that testing for cosmetics and household materials is not adequate enough to gain support for this argument. There is a lot of pain that these animals have to undergo for testing; hence animal testing cannot be supported. But at the same time all animal testing cannot be banned immediately because it is our only successful channel to develop medicines and cures. (Alternatives to Animal testing on the Web: FAQs) One cannot argue that all animal testing is useful in all cases but at the same time all animal testing cannot be disqualified.

Hence, I argue that it is essential to continue testing on animal until a truly effective alternative is developed, but till then we can play our part in trying to cut down on animal testing. Replacement is not always an alternative. Some significant type of testing just cannot be done without animals, at least at this moment. (Alternatives to Animal testing on the Web: FAQs) There are still no alleviation for many diseases contagious diseases like HIV/ AIDS, metabolic diseases like diabetes, and genetic disease like Cystic Fibrosis and haemophilia. The necessity for a vaccine against HIV, Hepatitis C and many other infectious diseases is definitely beyond doubt. (Testing on Animals: A Patients Perspective) Animal testing is morally questionable. It is bad and wrong but pharmaceutical companies invest millions of dollars for research and to find cures.

It is impossible for all animal testing to be substituted in the immediate future and it will take time to devise other methods. Studies are under way in trying to develop alternative methods of testing but they are still not developed enough. Most of the scientists hope to lessen the use of laboratory animals being used today and apply a minimum number of animals. Last year it was determined that the toxicity of a new substance was calculated to be LD 50 lethal dose 50 %. The test used about 200 rats, dogs or other animals to be force-fed different animals. The current variations in protocol have exerted a ban on the LD 50 test, except in extraordinary conditions.

Additionally, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development entails that when a substance kills the first three animals it is experimented on, further continuation of trials on them is considered irrelevant. In the 1970 s, the Netherlands applied 5000 monkeys per annum to form the polio vaccines. Now, the kidney cell cultures from just 10 monkeys entails sufficient information to find a vaccine for everyone in the country. Hormones or vaccines produced in cell cultures are also purer than those formed within the animal themselves. This further decreases the necessity for animal tests to verify the safety of the vaccines. (Animal Experiments) Presently there are improved methods to form safe products for human consumption. The concept of alternatives has been proposed.

In W. M. S. Russell and R. L. Burchs book The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique.

They mention three Rs as alternatives. It involves Reduction in number of animals applied, Refinement of strategies to minimize pain and distress to the animals, and Replacement of the animal model with a non-animal standard or a species photo-genetically lower. (Why Conduct Literature Searches for Alternatives? ) Most of the large manufacturers of personal care and household products could implement strategies that are considered cost effective, better predictors of human injury, produce far quicker results, and do not associated with animal cruelty. (Animal Testing Alternatives) Government and humanitarian agencies have financed researches into the substitutive strategies since the 1960 s. (Animal Experiments) Revlon Cosmetics has financed research studies for substitutions to animal testing. They donated $ 750, 000 to the Rockefeller University in 1979. Several agencies like the John Hopkins Center for the Alternatives to Animal testing CAAT, the International Foundation for Ethical Research, the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association, and the Soap and Detergent Association followed the trend and initiated their own projects in finding alternative solutions. (Animal Testing Alternatives) During the last 15 years, Germany has granted about $ 8 million per annum in research grants, while the annual expenditure of Netherlands in these regards is $ 2. 6 million. The UK government has also acknowledged this cause and has spent nearly $ 4 million. The European Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods was instituted in 1992 by the European Commission, and grants about $ 12. 4 million annually. (Animal Experiments) Indicating that progress is underway.

The most normal kinds of substitute strategies for animal testing are: in-vitro tests, computer software, databases of tests already performed and even clinical trial experiments on humans. Application of animal cells, organs, or tissue cultures is also believed to be a substitute irrespective of the fact that animals are killed in order to use their body parts. The particular tests are Enter, Skintex, Epi Pack, Neutral Red Bioassay, Test skin, TOPKAT, Ames test and Agarose Diffusion strategy. Presently, in-vitro in contradiction to in-vivo has advanced as a result of progresses in tissue culture methods and other analytical strategies. (Animal Testing Alternatives) The effective substitution involves test tube studies on human tissue cultures, statistics and computer models. People can substitute animals in some kinds of research.

Skin sensitivity experimentation of cosmetics for example can draw on human volunteers. Human clinical studies and epidemiological studies can find out a great deal about the strategies of health and disease. The statistical design symbolizes one form of reduction substitute. The cost effective statistical set of programs that exists now a days enables researchers to receive the most out the data formed by each animal they apply and therefore require a fewer animals in aggregate. Researchers can also share animals in order to reduce the number of killings.

For example if a scientists needs to study the brain of a rat, he can allow the other scientist to make use of the kidneys, or livers or parts for there concerned studies. Horst Spielmann of ZEBET of the German center for animal testing substitutes has reviewed decades of industry data on pesticides. He found out while mice and rats are reactionary to a chemical, it does not have to experience further tests on dogs. Spielmann expects that about 70 % of tests on dogs can now be successfully avoided. There is a common attempt by researchers to use lab animals that are less prone to undergo the sensations of pain or discomfort.

In Canada, many studies have substituted mammals with fish and now researchers are even attempting to apply bacteria in tests rather than the rats. Instead of shaving the back of an anesthetized rabbit to test a skin product, can we use Corrositex a synthetic material for the same purpose. Similar solutions ought to be devised for many other kinds of experiments that presently use the animals. Conclusion: While there has been promise to find alternatives to animal testing, the best researchers can do for now is try to reduce the number of animals being used. They can resort to new scanning technologies like magnetic Resonance Imaging, which can assist doctors to learn about disease from human patients without the actual necessity for invasive surgery, or animal experimentation.

Computer models can be used to devise the reaction of a drug to the animal, as a result it would eliminate the necessity for live animal experimentation's. (Animal Experiments) The development to the extensive application of substitutes to animal experimentation will persistently gain momentum as people become more aware about the problem. Though it is hard to eliminate animal testing completely, consumers can prevent the unnecessary animal testing by boycotting certain products that dont necessary require animal testing. To conclude, all we has humans can do now is to try to reduce the number of animals being harmed in these experiments aimed at benefiting society.


Free research essays on topics related to: animal experimentation, alternatives to animal, infected with hiv, animal testing, reduce the number

Research essay sample on Infected With Hiv Alternatives To Animal

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com