Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Rain Forests Developing Nations - 1,607 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

... ages do not even cover 20 percent of the daily food and travel costs for a single worker. Nike is another company that is getting globalize and is also often the target of anti globalists' demonstrations. According to human rights activists, Nike factory workers in Indonesia are paid $ 1. 25 a day while working eight to fifteen hours a day. Human rights activists argue, "Nike is undermining human dignity for a profit. You may survive on $ 1. 25 a day, but you cannot live and maintain your dignity. " (Polansek, 2000) The problem of Indonesian workers is not that they are uneducated and they do not know what rights they should have but the problem is fear.

Nike's Indonesian workers are afraid to unite because those who tried to organize a union and to fight for better working conditions and higher salary were tortured and killed by hired agents as an example to other workers. In contrary, Nike's web side is saying that workers in all their factories all around the world are well paid and working conditions are same as those in western countries. Nike also claims that human rights activists who spent a few weeks in Indonesia cannot understand the vast and complex issues facing the more than 200 million Indonesian citizens. Anti-globalists express their ideas through protests that were usually peaceful in the past but nowadays their activities are getting more violent. The reason for violence is that the peaceful, soft way of communication did not have any effect, so they were forced to be harder. The example of so aggressive protest happened in September 2000 in Prague.

The protest was organized by the Initiative against Economic Globalization in Prague (INPEG) and the target was the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund - the two international lending institutions which were holding their 55 th annual meetings in Prague. About 10, 000 protesters from practically every major city in Europe and North America came to Prague. Interesting is that this protest was not violent from the side of protesters but Czech police was brutal in trying to abolish the protest. The protesters wanted to continue the protest in the spirit of Seattle and the atmosphere was positive and peaceful. Thousand of people all over the world shared their views on anti-globalization.

However, on the second day of protest, about 11, 000 -member force rounded up activists for no apparent reason and about 900 protesters were put in jail and were denied food, water and phone calls (Klein, 2000). After this incident, many started to mistrust the Czech democratic system and Prague activists spent the latter part of their stay in Prague protesting not the IMB and the World Bank but the Czech police system. They no more compare the Prague protest with Seattle because American protests have usually different traditions. What activists would like to control is their media presentation. They were deeply frustrated the press describes them as ignorant and rebellious simply because of their youth.

Also among activist frustrations is the way the term anti-globalization is used against them. Activists argue they are not against the benefits of globalization (like speedy travel, mass communications and quick dissemination of information through Internet). Rather activists say they seek to get out a complex message that multinational corporations and the institutions that support them (WTO, the World Bank, IMF) are causing vast economic imbalances between rich and poor and horrible Third World debt (Straus, 2000). Even more violent protests of anti globalists are those happening in Genoa, Italy. Almost 100, 000 activists protesting against multinational companies like CitiGroup Inc. , Boise Cascade and Exxon have met in Genoa and about 15, 000 policemen were trying to stop them (Cooper & Trofimov, 2001). Violence erupted on both sides: from a fringe of anarchists who threw Molotov cocktails into bank offices and set cars on fire to the police who beat protesters and even the journalists.

Moreover, the police arrested about 100 protesters in near school where they were beaten. The fee was the highest yet for a globalization protest: one dead, 450 injured, tens of millions of dollars in damage and a large part of the city devastated by riots (Cooper & Trofimov, 2001). In addition, the problem of some activists is that their ideas and also acts are becoming fanatic and thus they cause many problems even to companies that do not contribute (or at least do not contribute too much) to globalization, as is the case of CitiGroup Inc. Last year CitiGroup Inc. refused to support Rainforest Action, activists fighting for saving the rain forests, and now all anti globalists consider CitiGroup Inc. as the company that is aiding in the destruction of rain forests.

The fact that CitiGroup Inc. is financial-service company that has nothing to do with rain forests destruction is probably not important for activists. Anti-global members spread their activities probably on every major international economic meetings in the world. From the most known protests are: WTO's minister meeting in Seattle, protests against Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) in Paris or negotiations with Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). "Anti-global activists have certainly made their voices heard in Paris, Seattle, and other cities.

Their message was uncompromising: global economic integration fostered by expanding international trade and, perhaps even more, by investment activities by multinational enterprises, impoverishes the world's workers, in developed and developing countries alike, and despoils the environment. " (Graham, 2001). In his analysis, Mr. Edward M. Graham, is trying to examine whether the anti-globalists protests are correct or not. He admits that "there are cases where foreign investment in developing nations involves sweatshops where pay is unacceptably low, working conditions are inhumane, and child-workers are chained to the machines they operate" (Graham, 2001).

According to Mr. Edward M Graham, these operations are atypical. There are strong evidences that "foreign-controlled activities in developing nations normally pay wages above local levels and create jobs that are desired by local residents" (Graham, 2001). Indeed, in factories like those run by US automotive firms in Mexico, workers are skilled and paid well even by US standards.

According to anti-global activists FDI in developing countries adversely affect workers in more developed nations where the investing firms are based. Mr. Edward M. Graham opposed that "the effect of direct investment in poorer nations are felt by workers in richer nations largely via trade." He pointed out example which shows that " direct investment by US firms in developing nations stimulates US exports and works to the benefit of workers in import-competing industries. Thus the effect of such investment on US workers appears to be mixed, with some workers benefiting but others being adversely affected. " The net effect, however, on the United States is positive. "Consumers gain from wider choice of products and lower prices associated with open trade. This gain, when combined with gains to workers employed in export-generating sectors, more than offsets losses to workers employed in import-competing sectors.

This in turn reinforces a case that has long been made, notably that adjustment assistance to the latter is warranted" (Graham, 2001). Anti-global activists also claim that multinational institutions destroy the environment. Edward M. Graham, on the other hand claims, that there is no evidence that economic activities are creating "race to bottom", but there is evidence that foreign direct investment creates a "race to top", for example, by replacing dirty activities in fast-growing nations with cleaner ones or by transferring pollution abatement technologies to developing countries. Graham also notes, however, that direct investment contributes to economic growth in developing nations and, because nations are in the early stage of development do tend to witness environmental degradation as a consequence of growth, there is some connection between direct investment and this degradation.

The philosophy of anti-global activists is not to destroy globalization that is bringing new technologies but to prevent inequalities which are caused by big businesses operating all over the world. The idea of anti-globalism is right but there are some extremists who are trying to stop the development of FDI in less advanced countries or in countries of Third World. Even though the wages of workers in such countries are not comparable with the wages of workers of developed countries, mostly they are adapted to living standards of each country. Although democracies have the right and the responsibility to protect free expression and lawful assembly (this includes rights for activists and critics), they are not allowed to spread tyranny of their protests. However, while anti-globalists are fighting for their purposes, it often happens that their strikes are so violent and dangerous (for instance, the strikes in Seattle, Prague, and Genoa). The tyranny of small groups, minorities or even majorities to prevent the exercise of such rights to shut down meetings is unacceptable in a democracy.

Work cited 1. Cooper, H. & Trofimov, Y. (2001, July 23). Antiglobalization activists are shifting focus to multinational corporation. Wall Street Journal, pp. 20 - 23 2. Graham, E. M. (2001, October 16).

Anti globalists did not kill the multilateral agreement on investment. News Release. [Online]. URL < web 3. Kellner, D. (2001). Theorizing / resisting McDonaldization: A multiperspectivist approach. [www document]. URL < web 4.

Klein, N. (2000, October 3). Press turns back on protesters in Prague. [www document]. URL < web 5. Korea, D. (2001).

Antiglobalization. [www document]. URL < web 6. Polansek, T. (2000, April 26). Human rights activists speak out against Nike. [www document]. URL < web 00 /apr 26 /news / news 03.

shtml 7. Straus, T. (2000, October 3). The antiglobalization movement gets global. [www document]. URL < web


Free research essays on topics related to: developing countries, rain forests, developing nations, www document, direct investment

Research essay sample on Rain Forests Developing Nations

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com