NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
THE ESSAY QUESTION: Anne: No beast so fierce but knows some of pity. Richard: But I know none, and therefore am no beast. Anne: O wonderful, when devils tell the truth! To what extent is the character of Richard in Richard III presented as devil, beast or human? MY ESSAY: In Shakespeare's presentation of the character of Richard III, we can clearly identify beastly, savage, [and] devilish qualities and characteristics. Indeed, Richard can be described as an amalgam of both the Vice and the Machiavel figures, traditional dramatic representations of evil and monstrosity.
However, some critics disagree, instead arguing that Shakespeare introduces a psychological dimension to Richards character, making him sharply human rather than an allegorical Devil-Vice figure or typical Machiavel. Upon studying and analysing Richards character qualities, it becomes obvious that he holds many characteristics in common with the formal Vice, Iniquity, a character in medieval morality plays. In these morality plays, the Vice functioned primarily as the hell-governed devil figure, an embodiment of pure evil and the ruthless opponent of God. Clearly, Richard hath ever been Gods enemy, in that he directly challenges and murders England's heirs, the inheritors of the divine right of kings, who held the throne with the permission and support of God. However, although offering constant opposition to God, the Vice character was subject to Gods will, and was always ultimately punished. Similarly, as the foul defacer of Gods handiwork, Richard receives his deserved punishment at the hands of Richmond, the conventionally good character who fights and overcomes Richard in Gods name.
In constructing the character of Richard, Shakespeare also draws upon many theatrically effective elements of the Vice tradition. Firstly, Richards grotesque appearance is a quality shared by Vice figures. Indeed, his deformed, unfinished body, withered arm, limp and hunched back symbolism the fact that sin, death and hell have set their marks on him, and indicate that he is unfit for any place but hell. Furthermore, like many Vice characters, Richard establishes an intimacy with the audience through his soliloquies and asides, continually taking the audience into his confidence. He shares his devilish plots with us, and invites applause and celebration for his deeds inhuman and unnatural. Lastly, Richard possesses the same sardonic sense of humour and skill in wordplay as did Vice characters.
Indeed, he jokes with the audience about how he will not keep [Anne] long, comments upon how the Duchess of York omits the butt-end of a mothers blessing, makes dark statements about how the princes will not live long and ridicules the stupidity of those he deceives. For many people, Richards black humour is the most intriguing, entertaining and appealing aspect of his character. Richard also comes straight from the tradition of the Machiavellian villain, a stage character of Elizabethan drama that was practically equated with the devil. Indeed, in striving for the throne, the tyrannical and devilish Richard puts his own political survival above any traditional moral restraint.
Subtle, false and treacherous, he uses whatever resources are available, as well as his dissembling looks and ability to flatter and look fair, smile in mens faces, smooth, deceive and cog to manipulate people to achieve his own ends. In his efforts to set his enemies in deadly hate one against the other, Richard acts various different roles in a number of different situations. Perhaps most memorable are the scenes in which he plays the jolly thriving wooer to win the hand of Lady Anne, and when he pretends to be religious, appearing with reverend fathers and well-learned bishops. Ultimately, Richards inductions dangerous result in the unworthy slaughter of Clarence, Rivers, Vaughan, Grey, Hastings and Buckingham, as well as the misleading and later slandering of King Edward, and the ruthless butchery of the innocent little princes. In possessing these basic Machiavellian traits, Richard can be seen not only as a devilish minister of hell, but as a savage predatory beast and monster. Indeed, like a primitive beast, he heartlessly and cruelly preys upon other people, putting his own survival before that of others.
Furthermore, it could be argued that Richard is a devilish slave to his satanic nature, and merely acts upon inhuman instinct throughout the play. These bestial characteristics are emphasised by the various animal metaphors sustained throughout the play. The other characters liken Richard to wolves, to spiders, toads, or any creeping venom thing that lives. Through insults such as elvish-make abortive rooting hog and wretched, bloody and usurping boar, reference is also made to the boar on Richards crest.
It is fair to say, in fact, that Richard is more a monster than a beast. Where he fails to feel conscience and remorse after arranging the slaughter of the little princes, his hired murderers, flash villains, bloody dogs wept to like children. Indeed, Richards monstrosity is symbolized in his appearance, which is so lamely and unfashionable that dogs bark at him, rather than accepting him as a fellow beast. This interpretation of Richard as a monstrous beast, diabolically evil Vice and scheming Machiavel, is consistent with political readings of the play.
When Shakespeare wrote Richard III, England was ruled by Queen Elizabeth I, the grand-daughter of Richmond, the man who overthrew Richard. After rising to the throne as King Henry VII, Richmond rewrote history in order to justify his kingship. He portrayed himself as the God-sent saviour of England, and Richard as a bloody tyrant and a homicide. Acutely sensitive to the political climate of his time, Shakespeare reinforced this official version of events in his play, by emphasising Richards evil character, as opposed to Richmond's moral and religious superiority. Indeed, Richmond emerges unmistakably as the Lords anointed, a divinely appointed champion of justice, upon whose side God and good angels fight.
By the end of the play, the audience strongly feels that Richard deserves to die and that Richmond will prove a better ruler. These feeling are encouraged by Richmond's decidedly political final speech, in which he proclaim[s] a pardon to the soldiers fled, and announces that he will unite the white rose and the red, thus bringing smooth-find peace, with smiling plenty, and fair prosperous days. To add a human or psychological dimension to Richards character clashes with his presentation as the absolute embodiment of evil, and is inconsistent with this reading of Richard III. Given the political implications of the play, Shakespeare had relatively little freedom to alter his portrayal of a satanic Richard. Nevertheless, many modern critics believe that Shakespeare invites us to see Richards human side, and to speculate about the motivations he might have for his deeds. These critics maintain that Richard is determined to prove a villain and to play the devil because of the way in which he is cruelly rejected and treated by a society that is prejudiced against him because of his appearance.
Richard knows that no creature loves him because he is a lump of foul deformity. Indeed, his own mother calls him bitter names and wishes she had strange[ed] [him] in her accursed womb. Rather than see Richards deformities as the symbol of his evil, these critics see them as its cause. However, Richards deformities do not prevent him from winning the love of Lady Anne, even though he had killed her husband and his father!
Furthermore, it seems likely that Richard did not suffer a childhood deprived of parental affection, and that his mothers hatred for him arose in hindsight, after she realised that he was sly and bloody. According to these critics, however, the existence of Richards motives is not the only evidence supporting their psychological reading. Apparently, Richards basic humanity is also revealed in the soliloquy that follows the appearance of the ghosts of his victims. Although Richard has tried to repress his coward conscience throughout the play, it supposedly emerges in this soliloquy, allowing him to recognise the hateful [nature of his] deeds and to feel genuine remorse.
The possession of a conscience, however, is hardly a quality that would fit a devil or beast very well. In this scene, it seems more likely that Richard remains devoid of conscience, and is stock [with] terror and anguish, not because he regrets his bloody actions, but because he is afraid of their consequences. He fears tomorrows vengeance at the hands of Richmond, and his own inevitably guilty verdict on judgement day. He has finally come to believe in the idea of sin and retribution, and recognises that he cannot escape Gods inexorable justice.
Indeed, as a Vice and a Machiavel, he cannot be allowed to triumph and must be punished for his transgressions. Perhaps Richard is merely trying to escape this fate by using his acting skills to fake repentance. Unlike his victims, many of whom believed that by [Richards] face straight shall you know his heart, we must not be deceived by his pretence! Indeed, Richard develops his conscience but momentarily, and appears to reject the concept in the next scene, where he declares that conscience is but a word that cowards use.
Thus, although many people attempt to read a psychological dimension into Richards character, he is clearly inhuman and unnatural, without a conscience, and without motives for his actions. He is obviously a foul devil and beast so fierce, a combination of the Vice and Machiavel figures, traditional dramatic representations of evil.
Free research essays on topics related to: vice, richards, beast, richard iii, morality plays
Research essay sample on Richard Iii Devil Beast Or Human
