Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Covering The North American Free Trade Agreement Nafta - 2,156 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

I. The Origins of NAFTA The underlying rationale not only of NAFTA, but of all free trade agreements is the belief that international trade is a win-win proposition. This belief is based on theories developed by theorists such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo, who dismissed the mercantilist view that a country could only gain at the expense of its rival. In their view, mutual gains for all parties involved would be created if two conditions were met: 1. If each country specialized in producing and selling the goods that it could produce most efficiently relative to another country ( = law of comparative advantage) and 2. If there were a free and unregulated flow of goods among and between countries.

Though the belief in the economic and moral rightness of free trade became a national dogma in Britain in 1846, it took a while for the free trade fever to hit the Americas, where the governing class held long and hard to protectionism and where Alexander Hamilton's Infant Industry Argument raised in 1792 was still very popular. This trend finally climaxed in the infamous Smoot Hawley Act of 1930, which raised U. S. tariff rates by almost 50 % between 1930 and 1932. What followed was the great depression of the 1930 s with astronomic unemployment rates, deteriorating living standards and a total collapse of international trade. As a result, the world economy was reassessed and restructured after it was found that trade barriers had contributed a great deal to causing the problems.

Hence, a new trend towards free trade emerged and, finally, the necessary steps to secure free trade were taken: First, the Bretton Woods conference of 1944 created the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Then, in 1946, the General Agreement on Tariff and Trade (GATT) was created at the first session of the Preparatory Committee of UN Conference on Trade and Employment. Conventional wisdom attributes much of the prosperity that occurred in the global economy since the 1940 s to the existence of GATT. In particular, GATT is considered to be responsible for the dramatic increase in world trade and the absence of any serious trade friction. In the face of this, todays numerous free trade agreements, such as NAFTA and ASEAN, have been founded in the spirit of GATT and free trade. Apart from these general reasons, there were also very particular reasons for the founding of NAFTA.

By far the most important was the decline of US international competitiveness in the late 70 s and 80 s. The USA found that the international trade system was no longer working solely in its favour, but also brought fierce competition in its traditionally strong industry areas from revitalized economies of Western Europe and Japan. As a result, the USA tried to secure its competitive edge by promoting the expansion of GATT rules into non-traditional areas such as high technology, pharmaceutical and communication systems. Moreover, the USA were increasingly dissatisfied with the Gatt's dispute resolution. Finally, in the advent of the EU, the USA found that it was time to build and exploit its own market, which meant looking around in its neighbourhood Canada, Mexico and Central and Latin America. Political and economical relations with Canada had always been rather unproblematic; hence the US turned its focus towards Mexico.

Like many other Latin American countries, Mexico was suffering from a severe debt crisis and was at the mercy of the international money and capital markets and just like them, Mexico tried to get rid of the crisis through economic and political liberalization. However, Mexico took the most aggressive measures by joining GATT in 1986 and also indicated that it would be interested in securing a Canadian deal with the US. II. The NAFTA Agreement What Mexico referred to was the U. S. -Canadian Free Trade Agreement signed in 1988. In place since January 1, 1994, NAFTA is an experiment that builds upon the aforementioned agreement.

It sets guidelines for the elimination of most trade and investment barriers between Canada, Mexico and the USA over a period of 15 years. More precisely, the objectives of the agreement are as follows: 1. Eliminate barriers to trade in, and facilitate the cross-border movement of, goods and services between the territories of the parties. 2. Promote conditions of fair competition in the free trade area 3. Increase substantially investment opportunities in the territories of the parties. 4.

Provide adequate and effective protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights in each partys territory. 5. Create effective procedures for the implementation and application of the agreement for its joint administration and for the resolution of disputes. 6. Establish a framework for further trilateral, regional and multilateral cooperation to expand and enhance the benefits of the agreement. Two issues of the NAFTA Agreement deserve a closer look: a) Relations to other agreements b) The concept of National Treatment. Relations to other agreements (Article 103) affirms the existing rights and obligations of the parties to each other under the GATT and other agreements to which such parties are party.

This part of the agreement has been an actual cause of past problems, especially in relation to the WTO/GATT and is very likely to cause more problems in the future. This report will have a closer look at Article 103 in chapter V. The concept of national treatment (Article 301) means, with respect to a state or province, treatment no less favourable than the most favourable treatment accorded by such state or province. This concept is widely similar to the The MostFavoredNation (MFN) concept of the GATT, which obligated all GATT members to extend any tariff (or related) concession granted to one GATT member to all other GATT members. The MFN rule is supposed to have the effect of accelerating the process of trade barrier elimination since it require a wide dispersion of concessions among member countries. III.

The NAFTA Debate The US Congress approved NAFTA in November 1993 after a public campaign that confronted a broad coalition of social groups, including unions, environmentalists, human rights advocates, farmers and consumer groups on one side with Fortune 500 corporations, large environmental groups, Latino organizations and much of the academic and small business communities on the other side. Supporters of NAFTA pointed out that the trade agreement would lead to a net increase of good US jobs because the trade liberalization would support and facilitate US exports to Mexico and Canada especially in high-wage industries. Moreover, they believed NAFTA would help Mexico to build a more modern economy and stronger democracy. NAFTA opponents emphasized that US companies would move to Mexico to take advantage of the low wages and rising productivity there. This would not only mean higher unemployment and lower wages in the USA, but also a threat to US labour protections because the Mexican government denied basic worker rights. In other words, NAFTA opponents feared that child labour and sweatshops could be introduced to the US market as a means of staying competitive.

Indeed, according to a 1992 Wall Street Journal survey, 40 % of all business executives indicated that they were strongly considering shifting at least some production to Mexico if NAFTA came into effect. 25 % said they would likely use NAFTA to renegotiate US wages. To appease NAFTA critics, US President Clinton promoted a number of side agreements on labour and environment. This created a number of institutions to handle complaints regarding the violation of environmental and labour laws and to set up funds for environmental cleaning. Finally, about one year after the founding of the NAFTA, Clinton claimed that the trade agreement was a success and announced plans to expand NAFTA to include additional countries, starting with Chile. IV. The Impact of NAFTA Not everyone shares Clintons view that NAFTA is a success.

While the economic benefits of the NAFTA remain largely undisputed, many critics of NAFTA are quick to point out that they had been right in the NAFTA debate in terms of the agreements negative impact on working conditions, jobs and other issues. To illuminate the success issue, this chapter will take a closer look at the ups and downs of NAFTA. 1) The Upside of the NAFTA Coin NAFTA is a free trade agreement logically, its advantages are almost exclusively derived from improvements of economic figures. Four distinctive areas of impact can be identified: Impact on trilateral trade, impact on Mexico, Canada and the USA. 1. Impact on Trilateral Trade: Trilateral trade between Mexico, Canada and the United States has significantly increased between 1993 and 1999 (see table below). Intra-regional exports grew at an annual rate of 11 % per year, resulting in an increase of approx. 92 %. Interestingly, this figure is significantly higher than the increase in exportation between NAFTA countries and the rest of the world during that same period (35 %).

In absolute terms, these exports accounted for $ 571 billion in 1999, which is $ 274 billion more than in 1993. Source: Bank of Mexico, US Department of Trade, and Statistics Canada There has also been a significant growth of intra-regional exportation, which resulted in exports accounting for an increased share in the total external sales of the three countries, from 46 % in 1993 to 55 % in 1999. Intra-regional flows increased their share in the total trade of the three countries, from 41 % to 47 % during the period in question. Source: Bank of Mexico, US Department of Trade, Statistics Canada. 2.

Impact on Mexico: In 1999, Mexican exports to the US increased to $ 120. 8 billion, or 182 % more compared to 1993 ($ 42. 8 billion). Imports from the US reached $ 105. 5 billion, or 133 % more than in the year prior to NAFTA ($ 45. 3 billion). Source: Bank of Mexico In 1993, exports to the US were 82. 7 % of total external sales, and in 1999 this share rose to 88. 3 %. Imports from the US are 74. 5 % of the total imports into Mexico. Mexico managed to increase its share in total US imports from 6. 9 % in 1993 to 10. 6 % in 1999. In 1993, Mexico received 9 % of US exports; while this figure had increased to 12. 7 % for 1999.

Currently, Mexico is the second-largest market for US exports, ahead of Japan, but after Canada, with which the US conducts the largest bilateral trade exchange ($ 365 billion), and in 1999, US-Mexico bilateral trade exceeded US-Japan bilateral trade, which placed Mexico as the United States's end-largest trading partner. From January 1994 to September 1999, North American investment in Mexico increased to $ 31 billion, which represents 63. 6 % of the foreign direct investment in Mexico during that particular period. The US is the largest investor in Mexico (accounting for 60 % of the total FDI) while Canada holds fifth place (3. 8 % of the FDI). Of the 11, 732 companies with North American capital, 36 % manufacture goods, while 21. 5 % specialize in trade, and 8. 1 % in financial services.

It should be taken into account that during the first five years of NAFTA, US and Canadian investment in Mexico averaged more than $ 5. 7 billion per year. Between January and September of 1999, said investments grew to $ 3. 8 billion. As of September 1999 Source: SECOFI, Directorate General of Foreign Investment 3. Impact on the United States: In 1998, US exports to Canada and Mexico represented 35 % of total (31 % in 1993) exports. Canada, however, still remains the number one US trading partner. Bilateral trade was $ 331 billion, followed by Japan ($ 185 billion) and Mexico ($ 174 billion).

In the five years since NAFTA was implemented, US exports to Mexico have grown by nearly 91 % ($ 38 billion to be precise). This is nothing less than the greatest increase registered by the US with any of its trading partners during the period in question. US exports to Canada and Mexico grew by $ 93 billion between 1993 and 1998, which is far more than the $ 83 billion increase registered jointly for the EU and the Asia-Pacific region during that same time. In conclusion, there was a $ 7 billion net effect on the trade balance, a $ 13 billion increase in the American GDP and $ 5 billion increase in business investment in the US. 4.

Impact on Canada: In 1998, trilateral trade within NAFTA amounted for C$ 752 billion. Canadian trade with the US and Mexico was C$ 484 billion. Since the treaty came into effect, Canadas trade with the US has increased by 80 %, while trade with Mexico has about doubled. Canadian exportation has risen significantly and has been particularly successful in such industries with high added value, such as the automobile, machinery and industrial goods sectors. The increase of exportation to...


Free research essays on topics related to: free trade agreements, canada and mexico, statistics canada, trading partner, international trade

Research essay sample on Covering The North American Free Trade Agreement Nafta

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com