Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Long Term Effects Short Term Effects - 2,307 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

... o dioxin-like compounds is through the consumption of animal fats, with bovine-derived meat, milk and dairy products comprising over 50 % of total exposure in the United States 1. The primary route of exposure hypothesized for cattle is airborne deposition of dioxins onto the leaves of feed crops. Over the last few years additional pathways of exposure have been identified associated with contaminated feed additives such as ball clay, mineral supplements, and animal byproducts. (my emphasis) - note: over 50 % of total exposure is rather vague, but this is a government document, and the public would be very shocked if they were to discover that the exposure to dioxin like products through consumption of bovine cattle products is closer to 91 % than it is to 50 % of total ingestion exposure, though 91 percent is over 50 percent, so clearly the document can be proven true. This study points to different notices of some dioxins in and on grass feeds, meal pellets, and the alfalfa's etcetera and is an honest study for sure. Very difficult for a three year old like me to follow, but the following are the laboratory procedures used: The samples were extracted with 75 / 25 Hexane/Methylene Chloride in a soxhlet for 24 hours.

All 12 of the WHO dioxin-like coplanar PCBs were evaluated in this project for most of the samples; a small subset only measured 7 coplanar PCBs. Limits of detection (LOD) for dioxins and furans (CDD/Fs) ranged from 0. 01 pg / g for the lower chlorinated congeners to 0. 20 pg / g for OCDD, and If the tests for contamination of foods for cattle were redone using Epa's method, the method who could detect what level is for hexane and surely methylene chloride, while looking for and measuring the concentrations of these two solvents used in the oil extraction industry, there could be a true measurement of the concentration of the most toxic of all petroleum distillates, Hexane and a measurement of the deadly dioxin Methylene Chloride in the animal foods that are destined ultimately for human consumption. Then we could know that the concentration is low as has been promised to me. (It has been promised to me by some speculators of the levels of Hexane in my food that the levels of Hexane that remain in my food are probably very low) I agree, but since I have seen my cattle acting as if they had taken large doses of Hexane, and I see in the public of america many of the effects that have been notes effects for Hexane exposure, Is it too much to ask: how low of concentration is Hexane and Methylene Chloride in my food? Meat, milk, and cheese concentrations of these two particular toxins, Hexane and Methylene Chloride?

Meat and milk have how high of concentrations of these toxins? I Think that eggs may have high concentrations of these two toxins in them also, and the meat of birds may have unacceptably high concentrations. As a youth I worked at an egg producing farm, and chickens are fed that same high protein meal. Thank you for taking the time to read and listen to my questions. I earnestly await your reply. As I intend to discover the answers to my questions and I think that people are the key to discovering the answer to any problem and any question, I am going to employ the newspapers of this area and Chicago and New York and some in California as well as the media in Australia, and England and other English speaking countries worldwide.

I have sent a copy of this letter to various Newspapers and Libraries and Congressmen and Senators also, by email, and by postage, and face to face I hand this letter to people who I meet. I will provide these questions to my leaders and put the onus on them to answer these questions. I intend to provide this questioning letter to anyone who is willing to help me to discover how much Hexane and Methylene Chloride is in human food. If my lab results come back as none detected, (it did) how do my local laboratory's first ever attempt to detect Hexane in cattle food compare with the average concentration of Hexane found in the meals, as measured by the EPA? -- That meal contains ~ 507 ppm, 1 POUND PER TON, detected by the EPA.

Because 95 % of all oil seed processing is Hexane- Methylene Chloride based, and processing meal other than with Hexane-Methylene Chloride is more expensive and produces a meal more valuable for resale, could a person make me think that some cold-pressed meal accidentally was sold to me at the mill, and that is what meal I have taken to the lab for measurement? The cold-pressed meals are a much more nutritious supplement, as more oil remains in that meal, but they require more care and could never be used in the existing methods for meal delivery and storage. The meal processed by cold rolling contains more residual oil in the meal more nutritional for the animals- but cold-rolled meal goes rank after some time, while the solvent-extracted meals store indefinitely) - my sample was solvent extracted, and so it has at least the average Hexane concentration as found by the EPA. Perhaps an answer could be posed that the Hexane escapes by evaporation into the open air. It seems that open air evaporation would work well for evaporating off the toxin Hexane from the grain meal, if enough time and temperature could be supplied, but what would I do if an open air hexane evaporation processing plant was built in my back yard?

The toxin Hexane is a reportable toxin and any corporation who releases more than one pound per year must report that release to the government. Since the meals are transported and stored in closed containers from the time of its processing until placed into watertight plastic bags for transportation to the feeding site by most farmers, there is no time or place for the hexane to evaporate after the food meals processing. Should our Dairy farmers account for and report the release of the known concentrations of Hexane that is in the feed they are feeding to their animals? How many tons of meal do 3500 cows eat in a year? High-producing dairy cattle each produce over 100 pounds of milk every day.

If Dairy cattle were only fed five pounds of Hexane processed meal every day, 3500 cattle would eat 6, 387, 500 pounds of Hexane processed meal in a years time. How much of the toxin Hexane would be brought into the environment local to that factory every year? In a year, using very conservative estimation, (Hexane concentration of. 01 %), that factory would pollute the environment and water supply local to that farm with 3, 193. 75 pounds of Hexane in a years time. At hexane concentration of. 1 %, 31, 937. 5 pounds of Hexane would be released into the local environment. The levels given by the EPA, interpreted by Dr. Randall Lovell of the FDA to me concerning this matter: Response: The EPA publication at this website is entitled "Emission Factor Documentation for AP- 42, Section 9. 11. 1, Vegetable Oil Processing, Final Report. " Table 4 - 4 on page 4 - 11 provides hexane concentrations in soybean meal and vent gases during processing in L/MT (GAL/TON).

L/MT is liters per metric ton and GAL/TON is gallons per ton. The average hexane concentration at 9 vegetable oil processing plants after the 'desolventizer toaster' process was. 565 L/MT or. 152 GAL/TON. The average hexane concentration at 5 vegetable oil processing plants after the 'dryer' process was 0. 442 L/MT or. 119 GAL/TON. The average hexane concentration at 8 plants after the 'cooler' process was. 360 L/MT or. 097 GAL/TON. I then converted L/MT to parts per million (ppm) and used 0. 6603 as the density for hexane. I calculated that the average hexane concentrations in the soybean meal after the 'desolventizer toaster' process, the 'dryer' process, and the 'cooler' process were 373 ppm, 292 ppm, and 238 ppm, respectively. - Dr.

Randall Lovell, FDA Feb 10, 06. At the lowest average stated by Dr Lovell of the FDA, about one half pound per ton of feed meal, and with the factory inputting five pounds of Hexane processed feed meal daily per cow, that 3500 head factory would pollute the local environment with 1596 pounds of Hexane in one years time. That is true unless the total of the hexane remains in the milk and the meat of the dairy cow who is fed Hexane. Where does the Hexane fed to cattle go to if it does not remain in the meat and milk of the cow? Do cattle have a body cleaner like humans have that excretes poisons through urine? If cattle put hexane into their urine, is their urine a reportable toxic chemical?

Using the official EPA findings for Hexane in the meals and the admitted average found at approx. 025 % of Hexane residue in Hexane processed feed meal, 1596 pounds of Hexane would be put into the local environment and water supplies for that 3500 head dairy operation every year. Should the release of hexane to the environment and local water supplies through feed given to cattle be regulated? Do Dairy farms report the release of the toxin Hexane into the environment and water supply? But what should the level of Hexane be in my food?

Is 50 ppm Hexane ok to eat occasionally? What about 500 ppm Hexane regularly? The EPA has measured Hexane content in the meals, the Hexane concentration can be measured and publicized by those people who know how to find Hexane. Can a valid measurement and levels be found for Hexane in meats and in cheese and in milk and in eggs that we eat? What amount of Hexane remains in my food? To anyone who wishes to do so, I grant permission to publish this letter or any part of it, no restrictions, This is a free letter, I encourage forwarding of this letter.

Earnestly, Dale Based: p. s. In reading the MSDS for Hexane, there is a discrepancy in the speech used there, when naming the effects of various methods of exposure to Hexane. The material safety data sheet for Hexane says that there are certain adverse effects for inhalation in the short-term, and also for the long term. The long-term effects of Hexane inhalation are noted as: the same as for short-term exposure, plus more adverse effects, including impotence.

The sheet says that for skin-contact, the effects of Hexane exposure in the short-term are certain adverse effects, and the long-term exposure effects of Hexane by skin-contact: the same as for short-term exposure. The MSDS sheet then lists the adverse effects that come from ingestion exposure to Hexane over the short-term, and for long-term ingestion exposure to Hexane the MSDS sheet oddly does not keep to form and say that the long term effects of Hexane exposure through ingestion are the same as for short-term exposure, but the MSDS sheet boldly claims: no information on adverse effects, for long-term ingestion exposure to Hexane. (Though the short-term effects were noted) If a person drinks Hexane for lunch on Monday, and suffers those short term adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, headache, symptoms of drunkenness, brain damage), that the MSDS notes for exposure by ingestion, and drinks that Hexane lunch every Monday for the rest of his life, should the MSDS sheet not say that the long term effects for Hexane exposure by ingestion are the same as noted for the short term effects for Hexane ingestion exposure? Why not just say that the effects for hexane ingestion over the long term are the same as for short term exposure? Is something keeping the OSHA from putting it in writing? Might it be that Hexane indeed is a regular food ingredient and actually is present in sufficient adversely affecting amounts in the foods that I eat, that OSHA encounters resistance to stating the obvious- same as short-term- when naming the long-term effects for Hexane ingestion?

Everyone tells the truth of who they are when they speak. Who does OSHA reveal that they are in changing their manner away from saying that the effects for long-term are the same as for short term, as opposed to what they have said for Hexane: we are not noting in this blank any adverse effects? A cursory reading of the MSDS for Hexane can leave a person believing that the Toxin is harmless, because they have read only the one line that might affect them, because Hexane is in food. I am going to ask my senator why the clearly deceptive MSDS is endorsed by a government that is of the people, by the people, and for the people. Why is cancer of all kinds so prevalent in the United States? Can the long term ingestion of immune system depressing petroleum distillates used in the manufacture of high protein, high fiber meals and healthy vegetable oils that we eat be validly associated with the many and varied cancers today?

Cancer is the symptom of an overworked and overburdened immune system, unburden and strengthen the immune system, and the body will heal itself of cancer. p. p. s. : This letter and an MSDS link have been posted to the website address: web and the web address web is under construction now. Both may be referenced freely. Will you research these questions I ask for your own peace of mind and come to your own conclusions?

If you agree that these questions are legitimate and deserve consideration, will you forward this questioning letter to deserving people who you know?


Free research essays on topics related to: meal, adverse effects, short term effects, long term effects, term exposure

Research essay sample on Long Term Effects Short Term Effects

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com