NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
Several conflicting frames of mind have played defining roles in shaping humanity throughout the twentieth century. Philosophical optimism of a bright future held by humanity in general was taken advantage of by the promise of a better life through sacrifice of individuality to the state. In the books Brave New World, 1984, and Fahrenheit 451 clear opposition to these subtle entrapment's was voiced in similarly convincing ways. They first all established, to varying degrees of balance, the atmosphere and seductiveness of the utopia and the fear of the consequences of acting in the non-prescribed way through character development. A single character is alienated because of their inability to conform often in protest to the forced conditions of happiness and well being. Their struggle is to hide this fact from the states relentless supervision of (supposedly) everything.
This leads them to eventually come into conflict with some hand of the state which serves as the authors voice presenting the reader with the absurdity of the principles on which the society is based. The similar fear of the states abuse of power and technology at the expense of human individuality present within these novels speaks to the relevance of these novels within their historical context and their usefulness for awakening people to the horrendous consequences of their ignorance. In these novels the main characters are, or become, unable to conform to the society's standards. These characters represent the authors view of the utopia as they see it with the veil of ignorance removed. In 1984, for instance, we start out with a character, Winston, who is constantly observing the ironies of the world about him. Through his job at the ministry of truth, he becomes a hand of the state, creating fiction to support its endeavors: Comrade Ogilvy, unimagined an hour ago, was now a fact he would exist just as authentically as Charlemange and Julius Caesar. (1984, p 54) As the book progresses he becomes more aware of his individuality and eventually is unable to hide it.
Similarly in Fahrenheit 451, Montag becomes aware of problems with his society, but not logically - emotionally. It disturbs him greatly when a medical team that helps his wife appear and disappear within a matter of minutes: There are too many of us, he thought. There are billions of us and thats too many. Nobody knows anyone. (F 451, p 14) He becomes further agitated when a casual encounter with an antisocial (normal by our standards) youth asks him if hes really happy. When these and other questions weigh upon his mind he begins to realize that something is fundamentally wrong with the world he is living in. In Brave New World the main character, Bernard, is set apart from society by physical differences, which, in a society of engineered people is extremely inhibiting.
It is these defects which cause him to look for a deeper meaning than the drug induced happiness forced upon him. These characters, although alienated in the novels, are believable and rational. The acts of their questioning in their search for the truth and real emotion persuade the reader to do the same thing. It is in this manner that the utility of these novels becomes apparent; through the demands they make of the reader personally - a superior social commentary, one that demands interaction, is born. The characters struggles to hide their newly found individuality is a futile one. In Orwell's interpretation of the totalitarian state of 1984, the society is technically and urban engineered to spy on and perceive peoples very thoughts.
The society justifies these invasions by eliminating the importance of the individual. The constant barrage of information regarding the greatness of the state and Big Brothers supremacy over the common man forces everyone (in good mental health) to accept these as the only unchanging facts. Any deviation from these beliefs would be immediately noticeable, and almost impossible to hide. This is what Orwell feared, from experience. After the world wars he surely couldnt help but realize the extent to which the public had been vehemently directed against the ultimate enemy and the common propaganda techniques of getting the public to seek out spies amongst themselves.
When individuality itself becomes the crime the horrifying dystopia ensues. Fahrenheit 451 accomplished a similar effect as Montag struggled to hide his guilt over the fact that he possessed books, which were illegal. His incrimination seems imminent as he notices many subtleties that suggest the authorities are onto him. This is especially apparent as he is complaining about the mechanical hound threatening him at the station then makes the possible connection: Montag stood thinking of the ventilator grille at home and what lay behind the grille. If someone here in the fire house knew about the ventilator then mightnt they tell the Hound? (F 451, p 25) As in 1984, this novel attempts to instill in the reader a sincere fear of the loss of their individual freedoms as well as the ability of such a technologically advanced society to find deviants.
Eventually all the alienated characters come before some prophesying hand of the government who is ready to rationalize the right and duty of the government to posses such control over its people. In 1984 this is during the torture of Winston for his crime of not loving Big Brother. Orwell then reveals the horrors of an advanced dystopia through Obrien such as the death of the individual: Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else. Not in the individual mind only in the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal. (1984, p 261) As well he goes into great depth as to the advancement of the parties strategy against its enemies: We do not merely destroy our enemies, we change them. (1984, p 265) Beatty, the fire chief in Fahrenheit 451 discovers Montag's affinity for books. As a result, he explains that books were made illegal because they always offend somebody. The new society, as he explains, allows all people, rich and poor, stupid and smart to get a sense of motion without moving (F 451, p 56) In this sense, the diversion of otherwise competent people into useless tasks and past times is the particular concern and fear of the author.
Finally, in Brave New World, John, a savage not raised by the society asks the world leader, Mustapha Mond, why they do not show films like Othello. Mustapha cites that not showing that kind of film is the price we have to pay for stability. As well, he speaks of the necessity for different classes of people to be in operation, even though more efficient methods through science exist. The prime directive of all these utopias is to pacify their public and either thrill them with the collective being of a nation, or sedate them with excitement and drugs. The authors therefor saw the utopian societies to be a trap for weak minded publics, and that once in place, such systems would be able to perpetuate indefinitely due to the efficiency at which they protect and propagate themselves. Through fear, diversion and sedation the utopia can maintain a strong grip on the people it encompasses before anyone realizes the sacrifices made.
The popularity of these books does rule out the possibility of such a society coming into existence in the future, however. The state of people is not about to change, and their ignorance will continue regardless of the harshness of the wake up calls issued.
Free research essays on topics related to: 451, 1984 p, fahrenheit 451, brave new world, 1984
Research essay sample on Fahrenheit 451 And 1984 The Fear Of Utopia
