NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
We teach the children only the highest of our ideals, the most virtuous of our values. An integral part of our code of chivalry is Immanuel Kant's Golden Rule: Do as you would be done by. It is taught as a rule to be followed not only in school, but one to live by. Children never fail to imitate the behavior of their elders. This is a beckoning to us, the people of the village who will raise the child, to illustrate our words, to show that the Golden Rule isnt just an empty clich. Such crimes as murder render life cheap and people expendable.
These atrocities are not to be tolerated. And a crime is only as severe as the punishment that follows, right? Ancient Babylon, in 18 th century BC, had its version of our rule. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, stated Hammurabi's code. Those who take the sword shall perish by the sword, agrees the Bible. A recent study concluded that every execution of a murder deters eighteen murders on average.
Raising the number of death sentences from 39 % of cases tried to 40 %, an increase of only 1 %, would prevent one hundred five murders. One hundred five lives saved. Executing criminals renders them unable to commit more crime. If theyre dead, what more harm can they do? There are two types of punishment: lex talons and lex saliva. Lex talons involves that eye for an eye principal, while lex saliva involves repairing damage by payment.
In some cases, lex saliva acceptable, but not in murder cases. One cannot expect to buy the forgiveness of the victims family. This puts a price on the life of the victim and does not take into account the family's need for retribution. If someone committed the capital crime, if he brutally murdered your mother or child, would you not want to know that he received the capital punishment, paid the full price? Would you not want to be sure that what he did to your family hed never be able to do again? I would.
Not only is it a matter of the family's need for reprisal, but also society's administering of justice. Imposing the death penalty forces the murderer to take responsibility for his actions. Punishment should equal harm done. Did the murdered not have a right to life? One of our most fundamental doctrines in this country says so. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
In stripping another of his basic rights, a murderer forfeits his own rights. If only we could bring back the victim, after the trial, the sentence, and the release, when the murderer is loose, on the streets, ready, willing, and able to reek havoc once more. What would the victim say? Wed have committed another murder.
We kill them again, those victims of murder. Many people present shallow arguments against the death penalty. We are no better if we kill them, the puritanical argue. Life in prison is just as effective and far less cruel. This is very true. True, that is, if one fails to take into account all the murders committed within a prison and upon escape.
Thirteen thousand Americans are murdered each year by released and paroled criminals. Also, keeping them in prison costs $ 1. 2 - 3. 6 million more than imposing the death penalty. Punishing people by incarceration is ineffective and usually results in criminals being released back into society. And if we convict an innocent person, what then? the skeptics cry. Yes, what then?
We make an exchange, or, rather a compromise, for our safety. This risk of executing an innocent person is our opportunity cost. One must keep in mind that 38 % of murder cases result in a death sentence, but only. 1 % of that 38 % are carried out. People die from car wrecks every day. The people who killed them didnt mean to do so. Why impose a standard of perfection only on our justice system?
Violence doesnt solve anything, the nave point out. If only it were true This is optimism at its worst. Historically, violence has solved more conflict and forced more resolution than anything else. So we murder to show that murder is wrong? the oblivious ask. A policeman has to speed to catch someone speeding.
There is a world of difference between a crime and its punishment. Besides, it isnt murder. Murder is unlawful and involves malicious intent. What are we if we impose the death penalty in those special cases?
the softhearted wonder. The victims family will most likely not take comfort in knowing that the person who killed their child had a low IQ, or some other mental handicap. Besides, giving special consideration would be discrimination. It violates one of the commandments, the religious exclaim.
The sixth commandment, when translated directly from its original Hebrew version says, Thou shall not murder. As has already been made clear, imposing the death penalty is not murder. And if He doesnt, who will pass judgement when we dont? We simply cannot wait for Atropos to cut the thread and deal with the menace until then. Capital punishment is sacrilegious by Christian standard, the ignorant shout. In Genesis 9: 6, God says, Whoever sheds mans blood, by man shall his blood be shed.
As members of a society, it is our obligation to burden justice upon others. Burglars pay for their crimes with money, for this is the value of what they took, but we cannot put a price on life. Life can be worth only life. Money cannot compensate nor can time in prison. In the names of all the victims of violent crimes, impose the penalty.
Peace and stability cannot be achieved unless we do. And it is true. Two wrongs dont make a right; in fact, they accomplish much more.
Free research essays on topics related to: eye for an eye, imposing the death penalty, innocent person, golden rule, capital punishment
Research essay sample on Capital Punishment Two Wrongs Make A Right
