Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Nuclear War Why We Need Our Nukes - 2,648 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Nuclear War: Why we Need our Nukes After much research and discussion I have decided to bring up the constant and ever rising conflict of nuclear warfare and why we need to keep our nuclear weapons. I believe very strongly that we need to keep, test, and build nuclear weapons, people will say that we need to keep a peaceful world and ban all nuclear weapons. The people that talk like that are simply ignorant; because if there is ever any kind of nuclear war or any type of superior threat that needs to be dealt with strongly and promptly nuclear force is most likely going to be the most tactical and reasonable choice. If all the test ban treaties ever written were to come into effect our nation would be in serious danger. Due to the simple fact that everybody else would advance in the world of nuclear technology why we are over here sitting on our sorry asses trying to make the world a better place for plants, animals, and ourselves.

I believe either our nation is incredibly ignorant or they are not telling the public everything the amendment grants to us. I strongly believe that if we knew everything that was going on in the world of nuclear warfare, the opinions of very many people would change. Right now as we speak Russia, China, Pakistan and many other countries have access to nuclear weapon's which makes them a threat! So why they develop new ways to nuke us, we are fighting with the people about weather or not we should waste tax dollars on a project that could some day save the lives of the United States.

You can't forget that nuclear weapons are not used so much as a weapon but as a deterrent. What I am saying by that is, instead of finishing a war with nukes, we could prevent the war all together by using the nukes as a scary little tactic to keep them at bay. This will never be a nuclear free world, you can't dismiss the ever growing world of technology, there will always be the threat of nuclear war, and if its not nukes it will be something more advanced and more dangerous. I just don't understand the big deal! Whoops, hit the wrong button. I really don't care much about the people, or the particular arguments involved on either side.

I can only say that it is not something that can ever be right or wrong one way or the other. I don't truly believe that any one with nukes ever intends to use them, but I think the point of nukes is the "what if" scare factor. Is anyone really willing to take that chance? Nuclear weapons have become the standard for gaining international voice and power, and as far as I can see there really is no other medium for gaining either. The only way for a poor, un industrialized country (such as Pakistan) to be heard is to instill a fear of annihilation, or just severe damage, in the hearts of the people of other more developed countries. Let's face it, if they didn't scare us, we would never look twice in their direction.

Nuclear weapons are, I feel, a permanent part of our world for as long as it continues to exist. Mine as well get used to them. Here is an interview given on Tuesday night to Michael Krepon 'I fear the treaty will be in limbo for many, many years' Michael Krepon provided rare insight into the arcane Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty on Tuesday night. The president of the Henry L Stimson Centre was engaged in an illuminating discussion with some of India's best known analysts on defence issues -- Achimn Vanaik, Paul Bidwai, Raja Mohan and C Uday Bhaskar.

Check out the transcript. It's fascinating. amber ish (Tue Aug 13 20: 58: 41 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, let us begin now. Would you like to comment on how non-offical's in the US view's India's stand? Krepon (Tue Aug 13 21: 02: 21 1996 IST): Amberish: The idea of a timetable for disarmament remains firmly rooted in the game-plans of many states and NGOs, but I'm not sure that the idea is spreading. The NWS -- except China -- remain firmly opposed.

The negotiating tactics by some NNWS in Geneva demanding more by way of preambular commitments toward complete nuclear disarmament may be tragically wrong. These tactics assume that the NWS are the demanders for a CTBT, and that this provides leverage to get more on disarmament. In fact, only the US Government is strongly interested in a CTBT at this point. The other NWS would just as soon see the Treaty wither and die. Moreover, support for the CTBT here in the US cannot be taken for granted -- witness the Republican Party's presidential platform calling for a resumption of testing and opposition to CTBT ratification. The chances for a CTBT are slipping away.

pat (Tue Aug 13 21: 03: 44 1996 IST): Hello Mr Krepon, Why should India sign CTBT when it is surrounded by neighbours who have a track record of hostilities commited against India. amber ish (Tue Aug 13 21: 06: 44 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, true that at this stage it is the US pushing the CTBT while others would rather watch it die. That is exactly the fear, especially India's, that others really do not want to de-arm. And how far can India go with a China on its borders, which even the US is wary of?

Nikhil Lakshman (Tue Aug 13 21: 07: 02 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, has Pakistan agreed to sign the CTBT? Is it true that Washington has struck a deal with Beijing to persuade Pakistan to sign the CTBT? Krepon (Tue Aug 13 21: 07: 19 1996 IST): Nikhil and Amberish: Many thanks for inviting me to join you tonight for this chat. I am grateful to you for opening this direct line of communication. Right now, the Clinton Administration is quite concerned that chances for a truly comprehensive and verifiable test ban treaty are slipping away, in part because of India's stand, in part by the non-constructive roles played by other countries. Most recently, Iran has indicated that it would join India in taking blocking action, preventing the transmission of the CTBT from Geneva to the UN General Assembly.

I'm not sure that this is the kind of company that India wishes to keep. Vinay (Tue Aug 13 21: 09: 43 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, does this mean you wish India to sign the CTBT? amber ish (Tue Aug 13 21: 10: 59 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, perhaps Iran's stance comes about because right now the US is planning sanctions against Iran. An Iran pushed against the wall is hardly going to be cooperative. And while, I suppose, India is wary of being identified too closely with Iran, its opposition to just a CTBT has been constant.

Krepon (Tue Aug 13 21: 11: 51 1996 IST): Nikhil: China's support for a CTBT has been less than fulsome, as is evident by Beijing's opposition to a flexible entry-into-force formula for the Treaty. My sense is that Islamabad would have great difficulty signing the CTBT if New Delhi refuses to do so. Benazir's political opposition has expressed itself against this course of action, which limits her freedom of maneuver on this issue. I am not privacy to whatever "deal" was struck between the US and Chinese governments, but I doubt if Beijing could or would choose to force Islamabad's hand on signing the Treaty -- assuming one emerges from Geneva. amber ish (Tue Aug 13 21: 14: 34 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, India is against joining the CTBT for fear of its security. So is the US in a position to give some sort of a guarantee against a nuclear threat to India?

How valid and useful would such a guarantee be? Nikhil Lakshman (Tue Aug 13 21: 16: 39 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, There is amazing consensus on this issue in India and no political party would ever risk ignoring that consensus and sign the CTBT. Again, many Indians feel Washington persistently ignores New Delhi's security concerns, so why they feel should India go along with the US on this issue? Krepon (Tue Aug 13 21: 17: 41 1996 IST): Amberish: Iran is actively pursuing the nuclear option, as is evident from Tehran's purchasing interests on black markets, and its odd pursuit for a nuclear power program, despite its considerable oil reserves. Tehran would not be too displeased if the CTBT didn't happen, which may account for its unfortunate blocking tactics. Vinay: Yes, I would like India to sign Nehru's treaty, and I would like India not to block other states from signing Nehru's treaty.

This treaty is an essential precondition to the elimination of nuclear weapons. I believe it would be tragic to loose this treaty in pursuit of objectives that are unobtainable at this time. Nikhil Lakshman (Tue Aug 13 21: 20: 29 1996 IST): Is there a way out of the impasse? Or will the CTBT go ahead minus India, Iran and Pakistan? What happens three years hence?

Some Indians fear likely sanctions if New Delhi refuses to sign by that deadline. Do you think that is possible? rajasthan (Tue Aug 13 21: 21: 30 1996 IST): hi michael, this is raja mohan and c uday bhaskar at the same number. could you tell us about the prospects for ratification of the ctbt in us congress, since the republicans seem thane come out against the ctbt in their election platform?

amber ish (Tue Aug 13 21: 23: 30 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, the history of disarmament talks has been one of failures. And it fails because the status quo do not give any margin to accommodate the other powers-in-waiting. So how can this rigidity of the state quo powers be overcome. And why on earth do Britain and France need nuclear weapons today. If they were to agree to disarm, would it not go a long way in convincing others of getting disarmament desires? Nikhil Lakshman (Tue Aug 13 21: 25: 50 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, invoking Gandhi and Nehru may cut little ice with the Indian people who are fed up with what they interpret as Washington's consistent banking of Pakistani interests, despite evidence of that country's nuclear programme.

In any case, why is India's demand that the nuclear powers set a deadline for the obliteration of their nuclear arsenals impractical? uday bhaskar (Tue Aug 13 21: 30: 03 1996 IST): michael, has there ever been an EIF of this nature - where a nation that is opposing the draft is being named or shall we say being dragged into the treaty? and as a follow up - why was the US not able to prevail with the original EIF which talked about the five nuclear powers only? Star War (Tue Aug 13 21: 30: 08 1996 IST): Does this episode emphasise the rhythm that third world countries can influence the world, only, by putting their foot down? Comments... amber ish (Tue Aug 13 21: 31: 36 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, can there not be a CTBT minus the recaltricant nations, who might be persuaded to join a few years later if they realise that there is no point in being out of the CTBT Krepon (Tue Aug 13 21: 33: 13 1996 IST): To Pat, Nikhil & Amberish: I don't believe India would seek or accept US security guarantees in order to sign the CTBT.

Even if such a guarantee were to be forthcoming from Washington, would it be believed? India has legitimate security concerns vis a vis China and Pakistan. This is not at issue. The real question is how India's security concerns are best advanced -- with the CTBT or without it?

Many of the articles I have read in India against the CTBT assert that the Treaty must be blocked because it would foreclose the nuclear option, and without the nuclear option, New Delhi cannot ensure its security. I find this argument very weak. India should have the scientific talent and capabilities to maintain the nuclear option WITHOUT TESTING. The design of simple fission devises is no mystery -- the US figured this our fifty years also without the benefit of computers. In other words, India should have the capacity to destroy a Chinese or Pakistani city with a Hiroshima-sized detonation without testing. India can design fission warheads for its recessed deterrent while signing Nehru's treaty.

Is not twenty kilotons of damage enough to deter India's neighbors and to secure India's security? The CTBT will block India's ability to develop with confidence a THERMONUCLEAR, or fission, weapon. This would take a series of tests -- without question. But why should India block a CTBT in order to maintain the option to design 200 kiloton weapons? Isn't a 20 kiloton weapon enough to destroy a city? Would Pakistan's position on the[paul and Achimn] we are on line now. (Tue Aug 13 21: 33: 58 1996 IST): [paul and Achimn] we are on line now.

Would Pakistan's position on the We are looking for information concerning India's views about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. (Tue Aug 13 21: 36: 22 1996 IST): We are looking for information concerning India's views about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Would Pakistan's position on the We are looking for information concerning India's views about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. (Tue Aug 13 21: 36: 23 1996 IST): We are looking for information concerning India's views about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Would Pakistan's position on the We are looking for information concerning India's views about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. (Tue Aug 13 21: 36: 23 1996 IST): We are looking for information concerning India's views about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Would Pakistan's position on the We are looking for information concerning India's views about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. (Tue Aug 13 21: 36: 25 1996 IST): We are looking for information concerning India's views about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

Would Pakistan's position on the We are looking for information concerning India's views about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. (Tue Aug 13 21: 36: 49 1996 IST): We are looking for information concerning India's views about the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Peace (Tue Aug 13 21: 37: 16 1996 IST): Mr Krepon: Do you think that it is fair for the government of the United States of America to talk about peace when they are sitting on such massive amounts of arsenal that can destroy Earth many times over, when the USA spends so much time trying to focus on other nations problems and causing problems in the bargain so that they can sell of their weaponry, Vietnam, Iraq some names to illustrate my point. Comment please (Tue Aug 13 21: 38: 05 1996 IST): [Paul and achimn]Michael: we tend to agree with your description of India's capability which the CTBT is not going to eliminate. We are appalled at India's and. Two wrongs do not make a right. EIF provision concerning INdia is wrong but this does not justify India blocking the treaty.

This risks losing a good arms' restrict measure at a crucial stage. amber ish (Tue Aug 13 21: 39: 06 1996 IST): Mr Krepon, thanks. But a further query. Definitely there is no reason to believe that after doing everything to stop testing, attempts will not be made to spread computer technology which can help develop nuke bombs. In fact, a few years ago, the US admin stopped the sale of certain computers fearing that it would be used to upgrade weapons.

What might happen is that there will be a total technology cartel, which would no way solve Indian f...


Free research essays on topics related to: test ban treaty, ist, nuclear warfare, nuclear powers, nuclear weapons

Research essay sample on Nuclear War Why We Need Our Nukes

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com