Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Counter Argument Sexual Relations - 1,250 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

A Reading of Donne's 'The Flea' Jimmy Breck-Mc Kye Gordon College Cambridge University United Kingdom It is common to ascribe to Donne the status of archetypal logical poet- a man whose works are tightly crafted, confident, and certain in their application of metaphor and analogy. True enough, Donne's poem seems to suggest a certain self-security: we see a tight, predictable rhyme scheme, and an ordered structure. There is also arguably a wealth of rhetorical resources - Donne does not shy away from using the lexis of the military (triumphs), the medical (two bloods mingled) or even the religious (cloisters; sacrilege). Such a feature that might be read as hinting at Donne's essential confidence in his ability to create a unified philosophy, to adapt a wide range of discourses, to demonstrate poetic craft. However, I want to suggest that the relations of power and position of sexuality in this small poem are a great deal less certain than such an interpretation might suggest.

At the very least, Donne is not simply providing a stylised, easy conclusion but is engaging in a real rhetorical struggle. He chooses to employ exuberant, self-conscious metaphors that often contradict themselves. The conclusion of his poem, Just so much honor, when thou yield " st to mee, Will wast, as this flea's death tooke life from thee simultaneously insists on the identification of the flea with the sexual union (i. e. it may be compared to yielding) and on the impossibility of doing so (referring to the mistress counter-argument, where the fleas death cannot be equated to the death of man and wife). That is, one might translate the meaning of the climax as: this fleas death did not kill you, and therefore the flea cannot be identified with us, yet this flea represents us, and so the insignificant death of a flea shows you how insignificant (little) my enjoyment of you is for matters of honor.

Such an argument is obviously a contradiction- he argues at the same time the fleas capacity and incapacity to represent the woman and husband. Similarly, he insists on the essential privacy of sexuality, repeating and emphasising marriage in line 13, by which he figures the domestic space and its objects as defined in primarily erotic terms. But lines 5 and 6 demand the addressee to consider sexual relations in primarily public terms- sin, shame or maidenhead (that latter word hints as much as social position- -head has the same root as the modern suffix -hood), where a flea is a small, insignificant object that cannot be equated with a sexual union. The paradox that concludes the poem both uses impersonal, public terms- honor more obviously, though yield also (it suggests a set of broader power relations, and would be associated somewhat, I would argue, with images of sexual relations in terms of larger-scale social hierarchies).

The very slightest charge we could level at Donne is that he seems tempted to sacrifice logic for rhetorical finesse- three sins for killing three is of course, not true- to kill three and commit sacrilege would make four sins. This is not simple pedantry, but rather I think it alerts us to a prioritisation of tried-and-tested stylistics over the logical progression that Donne's tricky arguments, grounded in points of intellectual studies of his age, asks us to focus on. The Flea seems to have its whole dramatic structure- the outrage at killing the flea, the resolution based on creating an (apparently) convincing argument, based around the reception of his logic and the lack of any conceptually engaging debates to contradict him. We seem, in the post-Romantic age, to take for granted a dichotomy between the intellectual and the aesthetic- yet early modern texts suggest far more a congruence of fictional activity and academic debate. Looking at Donne's arguments with a critical eye, aware of how 17 th century ideologies would have responded to the precise details of his postulations, I feel, is important in our readings of this poetry. In short, Donne seems to adapt his argument as it progresses, sometimes in contradictory ways- a feature that perhaps challenges that image of the metaphysical conceit as unifies, confident figuring of an entire world.

Sexual agency seems rather hard to pin down in this poem. Many verbs related to the action of the lovers sexual relationship seem to suggest a remarkable level of passivity. Deny is rather formal, abstract and does little to suggest the actual concrete action it represents. More significantly, a verb such as let is rather passive in its action- the woman who enacts the command is reactive, rather than proactive. The flea seems to be the only being invested with erotic volition: Me it &# 383; uck'd first, and now &# 383; uck's thee Not only is the sly obscenity a hint at the lack of clear hierarchies within a supposedly patriarchal household- the choice of objective case me and thee (whose similitude is emphasised by the internal rhyme) suggests the femininity of both partners. The flea is the phallus- the object that pamper'd swells with blood, the object with the capacity to &# 383; uck (Renaissance perspectives on sexual anatomy held female sexuality and genitals to be an absence, passively receiving and carrying the results of sexual action.

Only male sexual organs can fuck anything). Yet, at the same time, this is the object that is suddenly crushed, staining the womans nail in blood of innocence, at the exact moment of her triumph, a word whose military connotations should, I think, be read as attaching a firm sense of masculinity to its subject. This feminization of Donne, the apparent contradiction of his argument, and the crushing of the flea occur simultaneously- they represent a castration: the wife destroys the phallic insect; just she deftly counters the argument crafted for the purposes of sexual conquest. It would be tempting to imagine a far greater sexual radicalism inhabiting the poem, however, than I believe we should admit. This castration seems not the result of an uncontrollable female volition but appears to me as much staged by the male author himself. Looking at the report of the counter-argument: Except in that drop which it &# 383; uk from thee?

Yet thou triumph " st, and said that thou Find " st not thyself, nor mee the weaker now; Despite an ostensibly pivotal yet, the mistress response actually proves congruent with the preceding lines, and in fact the very opening of the poem. Donne's paradox, which he seems to be relying upon for the achievement of his erotic aims, depends considerably on this alternative reading of the fleas significance- that is: how little... // life will be taken by this fleas death. It is noticeable how this triumph actually fits rather neatly into Donne's rhyme, and more importantly how his choice of pronouns (thouthyselfmee) alerts us to this line being Donne's rendering of her speech- his pronouns reflect his own perspective. As indirect speech, the feminine voice is interpreted, defined and staged through the poets essentially masculine perspective. This male-ordained self-castration makes the supposedly easy task of assigning gender roles in The Flea a far more complex matter. Donne's poem hints not at stable patriarchy, but an early modern society questioning and playing with concepts of gender and associated forms of power.

There is a straddling of public and private spheres here, yet also a failure to achieve secure identity in either. The Flea points towards a symbolic order in a state of flux.


Free research essays on topics related to: counter argument, early modern, donne's, flea, sexual relations

Research essay sample on Counter Argument Sexual Relations

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com