NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... Watson, head of the ozone trends panel a supporter of the CFC banning: "Probably more people would die from food as a consequence of inadequate refrigeration than would die from depleting ozone. " An environmental scientist knowingly sending 20 - 40 million people to their deaths yearly! Banning CFCs would not only kill 20 - 40 million a year it will also lower the health of the remaining living people, by causing world-wide hunger, and food-borne diseases (Howard)! These are the type of people that control environmental policies world wide, the type of people who will kill mass quantities of people in the name of nature. Again the only people benefiting are those in the government. One of the alleged problems the ozone hole would create is ultraviolet radiation.
Environmentalist claim that the radiation seeps through the hole in the ozone and plague us with cancer and other skin diseases. Here again, however, the real facts prevail in disproving the lies and schemes of the environmental politicians. When in fact Melanomas have not been related directly to the increase in UV exposure. One could say possibly that the melanoma rates have gone up within the past years because melanoma rates have increased 800 % since statistics were first collected in 1935. There has been no corresponding change in the ozone layer or in the amount of UV radiation reaching the surface, to the contrary UV-B (the biologically active components) are at a steady decline at every test location (Singer). The fact that indoor workers have a greater chance to get melanoma than outdoor workers further supports that UV rays do not alone induce melanoma (Howard).
Another not-so well! known fact is that ultraviolet level are decreasing rather than increasing. In 1974 UV levels were higher in American cities then than they are today (Singer). The UV scientist claim that plant life in marginal areas will cease to exist (Ponte- 25). All people out west know for fact that this isn't happening nor will in this century.
The environmentalist keep telling people this and keep robbing them blind with products to prevent this or substitute products that won't cause this to happen yet are less efficient. Another alleged problem that some blame for the ozone is the dreaded, the feared, the greenhouse effect. The green house theory claims that once ultraviolet radiation seeps through the atmosphere it kills plants, the lack of plants then causes an overabundance of carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide acts as an insulator in the ozone, which in turn creates too much heat on earth supposedly throwing off whole ecosystems. There is even more irony in the greenhouse theory than in the ozone theory. First and maybe most ironic, scientist still cannot tell if industrial production emissions warm or cool the earth (Ponte- 23, 25).
The liberal scientist are shouting at everyone to stop the exhaust and industrial emissions when they don't even know what they do. Cooling and heating would have the same source which suggests that the scientist creating these theories either have no idea what they are doing, or they make the theories for the sole propose to scare, make money, and get power. ! The same environmental political scientist accuse the human race for the greenhouse warming / cooling are totally ignoring the fact that 96 % of all "greenhouse gasses" are made by nature! They seem to think the only evil thing on earth are the infectious humans (Haimson).
One important fact to remember is that not all scientist agree that there is any catastrophic green house warming happening, to the contrary some think that CO 2 increases would enhance photosynthesis and decrease moisture requirements for plant growth which should increase agricultural productivity. Enhanced productivity in agriculture would boost the economy creating more jobs (USA- 1 - 9). Our environment is very durable and very unpredictable. This is proven again and again in incorrect weather predictions, and climate changes (Ponte- 20). Even the most extreme environmental scientist admit that some years the climate cools and other years it warms, suggesting a natural trend (Haimson). It never seems to occ!
ur to them that there might not even be a global disaster to profit from. "Human vanity is such that we like to claim credit for all changes on the planet, whether we cause them or not. Climate swung through warming's and cooling's for millions of years before mankind arrived here, and will go on doing so long after we depart, Our power to such change is yet tiny compared to natures (Ponte- 29). " Not only is the greenhouse theory false, but it is also flawed in itself. The greenhouse theory assumes all other variables stay constant except CO 2. This ignores facts that compensate for CO 2. It also ignores the fact that most of the time things don't work the way they do in a controlled setting (USA- 1 - 3). Without the compensations made, however, scientist predict an degree increase in temperature by the year 2000.
Note: these same scientist believe in evolution (Ponte- 181). This quote proves the political involvement in the environment: "We " ve got to ride the global-warming i! site. Even if the theory is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy (One of President Clinton's top advisors) (Limbaugh- 181). " Liberals accept, but ignore the fact that fifty-three percent of scientists do not believe in the greenhouse effect while only seventeen percent do (Haimson). CO 2 has become the most blamed for the cause of the greenhouse effect, but CO 2 could not possibly be the cause, because the biggest temperature increase occurred in the first half of the 20 th century, while the large increases in CO 2 and other "greenhouse gasses" did not occur until after 1959 Howard-Saviors of the Earth pg. 40). There are many scientist that agree with conservative views on this issue such as Drs.
S. I. Rasod and S. H. Shcheider of NASAGISS when quoted: "What of the CO 2 and the greenhouse effect?
It is over rated. Temperatures do not increase in proportion to an atmospheric increase in CO 2. Beyond a factor of 2 to 4 the effect of CO 2 levels off. Even an eight fold increase over present levels might warm the Earth's surface 2 degrees Celsius... and this is highly unlikely in the next several thousand years. " Dr.
Reid Bryson points out, most human activity that release carbon dioxide and heat in to the environment also cause dust or other particulate in the atm! oosphere, fixing the ozone they "destroyed. " The CO 2 theory doesn't even make sense in essence. Some scientist claim that ozone is depleted, letting harmful UV rays in, the rays effect the plants in a way that they release too much CO 2, this CO 2 goes into the atmosphere and creates too much ozone causing a global warming. In order to have a greenhouse effect there must be a hole in the ozone to let the ultraviolet rays on to the surface, but once the CO 2 is released they create more ozone... go figure. Many scientist actually believe that CO 2 is good.
Take Dr. Coffman and Patrick Michael's for example: "Our climate is actually getting better from CO 2 increase. Rather than being a disaster increasing CO 2 has greater chance of being a major boon to life on earth. " Most information given by the media and even public schools are surprisingly biased, in fact the government itself has faulty facts and contradicting theories. For example, an official government document bearing t! he government seal of the United States contradicted itself at the turn of a page. A figure shown in the document shows that CO 2 does not effect the temperatures in the slightest, while in the reading directly below this diagram it contradicts this (5 1 - 6, 2 - 8).
Because of the obvious contradiction there can be no other conclusion drawn save that any reliable information in this document cannot be deciphered. This indicates that not even the government knows for fact that there is a problem, in fact they have no evidence just like every one else. Now that you have seen that the warning publicizing of the ozone is nothing but a fraud you might ask why the creators would do such a thing. I am almost certain that the whole scam is nothing but a money, and power ploy. Just think how much money the government, both local and federal, can gain from this scare. All "earth conscientious " people will want to "save" our dying earth from the terrible talons of the evil human race by taking the public bus instead of driving.
They will also buy non-aerosol products, or "ozone safe" products even if they are more expensive and / or less efficient. Now how does the government gain of the buying of more expensive products? Any time there is a sudden switch of product buying, or fad in a product the economy grows pulling in more tax dollars. Even more important than the money; however, the government gains more control, or power over its citizens by "forcing" them to by these and grows larger, slowly, ever so slowly taking over! more and more of the country it governs until finally it has total control. An example of this happening is the Montreal Protocol.
So, as anyone can see the only hole in the ozone is in the theory. Source Cited Barely, Sharon. "Is the Ozone Hole in Our Heads?" News Week October 11, 1993: pg. 71. Bindotto, Robert "Ozone and Objectivity" Online. Pitt. November 20, 1996 "Can We Delay a Greenhouse Warming?" United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1983 Limbaugh, Rush. See I Told You So.
New York: Pocket Books a division of Simon and Schuster Inc. 1993 Lutgens, Fredrick K. and Track, Edward J. The Atmosphere NJ Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1986 pg. 189 - 195. Singer, Fred, S. Ph.
D. "My Adventures in the Ozone Layer. " Online Pitt. November 18, 1997 Ponte, Lowell. The Cooling NJ Prentice-Hall Inc. , 1976 Haimson, Leslie, Oppenheimer, Michael, and Welcome, David "The Way Things Really Are" Online. Pitt.
Thesis: The "Hole", however, only exists in the minds of environmental, fanatic scientists and politicians. The protective Ozone layer around our world undergoes much thought and debate. I. Introduction A. Ozone Depletion 1. Public Consensus 2.
Scientific Consensus 3. Natural Phenomenon 4. Facts, Real B. Ozone gasses 1.
Gasses Accused 2. Gasses, What They Really Do 3. Gasses ("Evil") Helping 4. Volcanoes 5. Nature vs.
Humans C. Fluorocarbons (CFCs) 1. Controversy Of 1947 2. "Crimes of" 3. Theory Flaws D. The Montreal Protocol 1. Parameters 2.
Effects of Banning E. Ultraviolet Rays 1. Ozone Related To? 2. Cancer 3. Levels F. Global Warming/ The Green House Effect 1.
Ozone, How It Is Related 2. Irony 3. Global Warming Natural? ! ? 4. Global Warming Trivial And Flawed 5.
Politics G. CO 2 1. CO 2, Not Related 2. CO 2, Over Rated H. Government Document 1. Contradiction 2.
Graphs II. "Ozone Depletion" A. Public Consensus 1. The Ozone is Depleting (10) 3. The Ozone is Going to Disappear B. Scientific Consensus 1.
Scientists That Invented the Instrument to Measure Ozone (6) 2. Novas (3 - 178) 3. Humankind Stronger Than Nature? 4. Holes Never Exist (9) 5.
Quote: Derek Barton (7 - 71) 6. Evidence, the Lack of (8) 7. Percentages (9) C. Natural Phenomenon 1. Ozone Naturally Varies (4 - 30) 2. Ozone Thins Naturally (Volcanoes/Earthquakes) (9) 3.
Ozone Increases (Sunspots) (4 - 30) 4. Air Currents (1 185 - 186) 5. Surface Pressure (1 189 - 190) 6. Temperature (1 - 189) D. Facts, Real 1.
Ozone Layer Increase (4 - 30) 2. NAS Study (6) 3. Ozone Has No Effect On Cancer (6) 4. Ozone Cannot Expand... Antarctica (8) 5. Mankind Not Capable (3 - 171) III.
Ozone Gasses A. Gasses Accused B. Gasses What They Really Do C. Gasses (Evil) Helping (6) 1. Methane 2. Nitrogen Oxides 3.
Carbon Dioxide D. Volcanoes 1. 1976 (7) 2. Dispute (8) a. Volcano Power vs. Human Power b.
Time Irrelevant E. Nature Vs. Humans 1. Same Stuff (7) a.
Natural Falls Out As Rain b. Artificial Stays In c. Same Stuff 2. "Exceptions" a. Myth: Natural Gasses (10) b. Fact: Same c. "Nature Stays in Balance" d. "Artificial Are Too Much For Nature" e.
Same Stuff IV. Fluorocarbons (CFCs) A. .".. 1947... Controversy" (4 - 23) B. "Crimes Of" 1. Theory 2. Proof (None) C. Theory Flaws 1.
CFC Theory Incomplete (6) 2. Use Of CFCs Grew Rapidly Since 1977 (4 - 25 - 26) 3. Projection (4 - 24) 4. Measurements Before (9) 5. NASA Study (8) V. The Montreal Protocol A.
Parameters 1. Montreal Protocol (Definition) (9) 2. Document (LOST! ! ) (9) 3. CFCs Banned Without Impartial Input (9) 4. Liberals Thank... (10) B. Effects of Banning 1.
Cost (9) 2. Replacements Toxic (9) 3. Replacements More Expensive (9) 4. Deaths Caused By Replacements (9) 5. Quote: Robert Watson (9) VI. Ultraviolet Rays A.
Ozone "Hole" Related To B. Cancer 1. "UV Rays Related" 2. UV Rays Not Related (6) 3. Cancer Rates (6) 4. Cancer Indoors? (9) C.
Levels 1. Lower (6) 2. Desert Effects (4 - 25) VII. Global Warming/Green House Effect A. Ozone "Hole" Related (4 - 25) 1. UV 2.
CO 2 B. Irony 1. Scientists Not Sure... (4 - 23) 2. 96 % of Green House Gasses... (10) 3. Scientists Do Not Agree (9) 4. Heating And Cooling Have Same Source (4 - 29) 5. CO 2 Increases Would Help The Economy (5 1 - 9) C.
Global Warming Natural 1. Nature Unpredictable (4 - 20) 2. Environmentalists Admit (10) 3. Quote: Lowell Ponte D. Global Warming Trivial And Flawed 1. Green House Theory Assumes Temp.
Supposed To Raise Only Degree Celsius (4 22 - 23) E. Politics 1. Quote: Adviser (3 - 181) 2. Liberal (10) VIII.
CO 2 A. CO 2 Not Related To Global Warming (9 - Saviors of the Earth p. 40) B. CO 2 Over Rated 1. Quote: Drs. S. I.
Rasod, S. H. Schneider (4 - 29) 2. Problem Fixing Itself (4 - 28) 3.
CO 2 Good? Quote: Drs. Coffman, And Michaels (9) Quote: Drs. Coffman, And Michaels (9) C. Government Document 1. Graph 12, 4 - 25) 2.
Writing vs. Grap Conclusion IX. Conclusion A. Ozone Depletion 1. Gasses 2. CFCs 3.
The Montreal Protocol B. Global Warming/ Green House Effect 1. CO 2 2. Government Document C. My Comments
Free research essays on topics related to: nj prentice hall, greenhouse gasses, ultraviolet rays, ozone depletion, green house effect
Research essay sample on The Ozone A Hole In Theory
