Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Martin Luther King Luther King Jr - 3,217 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X grew up in different environments. King was raised in a comfortable middle-class family where education was stressed. On the other hand, Malcolm X came from and underprivileged home. He was a self-taught man who received little schooling and rose to greatness on his own intelligence and determination. Martin Luther King was born into a family whose name in Atlanta was well established.

Despite segregation, Martin Luther King s parents ensured that their child was secure and happy. Malcolm X was born on May 19, 1925 and was raised in a completely different atmosphere than King, an atmosphere of fear and anger where the seeds of bitterness were planted. The burning of his house by the K Klux Klan resulted in the murder of his father. His mother later suffered a nervous breakdown and his family was split up. He was haunted by this early nightmare for most of his life. From then on, he was driven by hatred and a desire for revenge.

The early backgrounds of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King were largely responsible for the distinct different responses to American racism. Both men ultimately became towering icons of contemporary African-American culture and had a great influence on black Americans. However, King had a more positive attitude than Malcolm X, believing that through peaceful demonstrations and arguments, blacks will be able to someday achieve full equality with whites. Malcolm X s despair about life was reflected in his angry, pessimistic belief that equality is impossible because whites have no moral conscience.

King basically adopted on an integration alist philosophy, whereby he felt that blacks and whites should be united and live together in peace. Malcolm X, however, promoted nationalist and separatist doctrines. For most of his life, he believed that only through revolution and force could blacks attain their rightful place in society. Both X and King spread their message through powerful, hard-hitting speeches. Nevertheless, their intentions were delivered in different styles and purposes. King was basically a peaceful leader who urged non-violence to his followers.

He travelled about the country giving speeches that inspired black and white listeners to work together for racial harmony. (pg. 135, Martin Luther King Jr. and the Freedom Movement) Malcolm X, for the most part, believed that non-violence and integration was a trick by the whites to keep blacks in their places. He was furious at white racism and encouraged his followers through his speeches to rise up and protest against their white enemies. After Malcolm X broke away from Elijah Mohammed, this change is reflected in his more moderate speeches. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King s childhoods had powerful influences on the men and their speeches. Malcolm X was brought up in an atmosphere of violence.

During his childhood, Malcolm X suffered not only from abuse by whites, but also from domestic violence. His father beat his mother and both of them abused their children. His mother was forced to raise eight children during the depression. After his mother had a mental breakdown, the children were all placed in foster homes. Malcolm X s resentment was increased as he suffered through the ravages of integrated schooling.

Although an intelligent student who shared the dream of being a lawyer with Martin Luther King, Malcolm X s anger and disillusionment caused him to drop out of school. He started to use cocaine and set up a burglary ring to support his expensive habit. Malcolm X s hostility and promotion of violence as a way of getting change was well established in his childhood. Martin Luther King lived in an entirely different environment. He was a smart student and skipped two grades before entering an ivy league college at only the age of 15. He was the class valedictorian with an A average.

King paraded his graduation present in a new green Chevrolet before his fellow graduates. He was raised in the perfect environment where dreams and love were generated. King and X s childhoods are a study in polarity. (pg. 254, Reflecting Black) Whereas, Malcolm X was raised in nightmarish conditions. King s home was almost dream-like. He was raised in a comfortable middle-class home where strong values natured his sense of self-worth.

Sure, many have admired Malcolm X and Martin Luther King for the way that they preached. Both King and Malcolm X promoted self-knowledge and respect for one s history and culture as the basis for unity. (pg. 253, Reflecting Black. ) Other than the fact that they were similar in some ways, they also had many differences that people admired, both in belief and speech. Malcolm X, in many ways, was known to many as an extremist. For most of the time that he spent as an Islamic minister, he preached about separatism between blacks and whites. He also preached about black nationalism, and as some would call it, black supremacy, (reporter from Malcolm X movie). Malcolm X had been misled all through his life.

This can be shown especially at the time when he broke away from the black Muslim party, because he realised that they were misleading him by telling him that separatism between blacks and whites is the only way to go. They also misled him by telling him that separatism is a part of the Islamic religion. Malcolm X s life was known to many as a nightmare because he was abused and haunted by both blacks and whites. Malcolm X blamed many of the conditions that blacks in the United States lived in on the whites. He also talked about how the white man still sees the black man as a slave. Martin Luther King appeared to many as calm and idealistic.

Many say his calmness came from his peaceful, middle-class life. For instance, King preached about equality for blacks and whites. He also preached about getting this equality through a non-violent way. King s popularity was more than any other black leader s popularity. King urged blacks to win their rightful place in society by gaining self-respect, high moral standards, hard work and leadership. He also urged blacks to do this in a non-violent matter, (pg. 255, Reflecting Black) The difference is in Malcolm X and Martin Luther King s backgrounds had a direct influence on their later viewpoints.

As a black youth, Malcolm X was rebellious and angry. He blamed the poor social conditions that blacks lived in on the whites. His past ghetto life prepared him to reject non-violence and integration and to accept a strong separatist philosophy as the basis for black survival, (Internet, Malcolm X anniversary). He even believed at one time that whites were agents of the devil.

As a result, Malcolm X recommended a separatist and nationalist strategy for black survival, (pg. 57, Malcolm X: The man and his times) He believed that only through violence would conditions change. He saw no evidence that white society had any moral conscience and promoted the role of the angry black against racist America. King s philosophies presented a sharp contrast to those of Malcolm X. He believed that through hard work, strong leadership, and non-violent tactics, blacks could achieve full equality with whites. His belief in non-violence even extended to a woman who nearly killed him. He was reported as saying, don t persecute her, get her healed, (pg. 52, Martin Luther King Jr.

and the Freedom Movement). Near the end of their lives, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X s beliefs became more similar. Malcolm X corrected himself after his break with the black Muslim movement. He now emphasised unity and change through black pride and respect for oneself rather than through hate and revenge. King, on the other hand, became somewhat angry at the lack of progress made on equality. He started promoting non-violent sabotage, which including blocking the normal functioning of government.

At one time, Malcolm X actually wanted to join forces with King and the progressive elements of the Civil Rights Movement, (pg. 262, Malcolm X: The man and his times). To many, King and Malcolm X were heroes of the Civil Rights Movement. However, many have also seen that King was more pessimistic, while Malcolm X was more optimistic about separatism for most of his life. Some have said that later on in their lives, they had taken the opposite roles and changed.

The speeches of King and X reflected both men s visions on improving America. Both men believed that if blacks were to attain freedom, they first needed to achieve self-respect. However, Malcolm X s speeches were delivered in a revolutionary tone which could incite his listeners to hatred of white America. Malcolm X used direct and to the point language which could be understood by all levels of society.

He had mastery in language and could project his ideas, (Internet, Remember Malcolm X) This creativity in language helped build the Black Muslim Movement in the United States. In his Definition of a Revolution speech, delivered in November 1963, Malcolm X openly justifies violence as a way of gaining equality. And if it is right for America to draft us and teach us how to be violent in defence of the country, then isn t it right for you and me to do whatever is necessary to defend our own people right here in this country, (pg. 253, Malcolm X: The man and his times). He encouraged blacks to hate white America and to revolt against them. Revolution is bloody, revolution is hostile, revolution knows no compromise, revolution overturns and destroys everything that gets in its way, (pg. 255, Malcolm X: The man and his times). In his speech God s Judgement of White America, delivered on December 1, 1963, Malcolm X again promoted his separatist philosophy.

America must set aside some separate territory here in the Western Hemisphere where the two races can live apart from each other, since we certainly don t get along peacefully while we are here together, (pg. 287, Malcolm X: The man and his times) After Malcolm X s pilgrimage to Mecca in 1964, he reappraised white America and modified somewhat his racist and anti-white beliefs. This change is reflected in his Communication and Reality spoken to the American Domestic Peace Corps. I am against any form of racism. We are all against racism. I believe in Allah. I believe in the brotherhood of man, all men, but I do not believe in the brotherhood with anybody who does not want brotherhood with me, (pg. 289, Malcolm X: The man and his times) Martin Luther King was an equally strong speaker.

However, most of his speeches were given to encourage white and black people to work together for racial harmony. He especially wanted to teach impressionable black youth that equality could be gained through non-violent methods. These ideals are reflected in his famous I have a dream speech, where King addressed to over 250 000 people. In this speech, King urges black people to never forget their dreams. King preaches that in the eyes of God, the blacks are as good as any other race and should be treated as equals. I have a dream that one day every valley will be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places shall be made plain, and the crooked places shall be made straight, and the glory of the lord shall be revealed, and all shall see it together, (Internet, Martin Luther King s I Have a Dream speech) Unlike Malcolm X, King does not incite his followers to riot and hate, but encourages his followers to remember that all people are God s children and that hopefully one day all American can join together to sing My country tis of thee, Sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing King s eventual disillusionment became because of the lack of success the blacks were making in America.

This discomfort is reflected in his A time to break the silence speech. In this speech, he openly condemns American involvement in the Vietnam war. He preaches that America should solve its own racial and social problems before sending vulnerable young men, especially black men, to fight other country s battles. So we have been respectfully forced with the cruel irony of watching Negroes and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to sit them together in the same schools, (Internet, A time to break the silence speech) Malcolm X and Martin Luther King are both remembered as leaders who fought for a difference in black America. Both tried to bring hope to blacks in the United States. They also tried to instil within blacks power and strength so they could rise above all the hatred that surrounded them, but both of them had very different ways of promoting their message.

Malcolm X had a much more extremist approach. Many say that this approach came from his neglectful childhood and early adulthood. King had a much more calm approach. Some have said that this non-violent approach came from his safe, middle-class environment. Even though they were different in addressing their messages about black respect and pride, they both had the same goal in mind. That goal was to achieve equality between all races.

Returning from the second world war, black Americans, just as those three decades prior, expected to find America a land of equality for all people and specifically a land endowed with increased black civil rights. Although the late 1940 s and 1950 s are not generally considered a period social advancement for blacks due to the volatility and revolution of the 1960 s, the decade and a half after World War II ultimately proved to be a very significant chapter in the history of black civil rights and a pivotal stepping stone for the drastic social uproar of the next decade. In 1950, America counted fifteen million black citizens, two thirds of whom still lived lives in the segregated south of social injustice and inequity as well as a clear disadvantage in attaining upward financial mobility in a region firmly dedicated to preserving the white status quo. Bound by rigid Jim Crow laws, the black view of life appeared bleak.

Nonetheless, a period of increasing black civil rights was already underway. Paving the way for the entire revolution was Jack Roosevelt (Jackie) Robinson, the first black American to play major league baseball. Blacks had crept in Americas national past time; more radical social changes were soon to come. Disenfranchised blacks finally found a leader dedicated to their cause in Harry S. Truman. After hearing of a lynching of black war veterans, Truman was suddenly tuned in to the heated crisis in the southland.

Despite persistent tries to advance the cause of the blacks, Truman was repeatedly shot down by a conservative congress. The boiling discontent felt by the blacks since the days of slavery could not be silenced so easily. The war had generated a new militancy and restlessness in the black community. Blacks increasingly voiced their opinions publicly and found many effective ways to advance their cause. The first such case came in 1944 when, after years of prodding by the NAACP, the supreme court ruled all-white primaries unconstitutional.

Following the landmark ruling, NAACP chief legal advisor, Thurgood Marshall, later a supreme court justice himself, successfully appealed to the supreme court that separate professional schools for blacks failed to meet tests of equality with their all-white counterparts. Discovering new ways to advance their lives, a revolution had begun. By far the most instrumental and powerful black leader in the entire civil rights movement was a prominent black minister, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Using the black church as base, King harnessed the most organized and powerful black organization in the country.

A powerful orator and a devotee to the non-violent principles professed by Indias Mohandas Ghandi, King enabled blacks to take the civil rights movement into their own hands. Kings rise to prominence was catapulted by the Montgomery bus boycotts. After refusing to give up her seat on a segregated bus, Rosa Parks arrest sparked a year-long bus boycott that serve to notice throughout the Deep South that blacks would no longer meekly admit to the indignities of segregation. Despite an arrest during the Montgomery boycotts, King emerged more dedicated to social equality.

In 1957, King established the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Dedicated to mobilizing the vast power of the black churches, blacks now had an unprecedented, powerful tool to combat the forces of southern democrats in favor of segregation. Less organized was the sit-in movement sparked by four black college freshmen in Greensboro, North Carolina. Nonetheless, the sit-in spread like wild fire throughout the south as many previously segregated businesses wielded under the increasing pressure.

At the end of the decade, southern black students formed the Student Non- Violent Coordinating Committee to give more focus to these efforts. As these bodies of social justice grew in power and prestige, they possessed an undeniable role in the civil rights movement to flourish in the 60 s. Most important of the civil rights advancements of blacks were the landmark supreme courts rulings enacted to tear down the institutions of segregation in place for nearly three quarters of a century after the fall of slavery. Clearing the way for the civil rights movement was Chief Justice Earl Warren. Appointed by Eisenhower, a man who believed more in social harmony than social justice, Warren shocked the president and other conservatives with his active intervention in extremely controversial social issues. Warren believed in legislation by the judiciary in default of legislation by Congress, and the 1950 s were definitely an era in default of active social legislation by Congress.

The epochal Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas ruling declared that forced segregation in public schools was inherently unequal and thus unconstitutional. The landmark decision overturned the courts 1896 Please v. Ferguson ruling that separate but equal educational institutions were allowable under the constitution. The ruling was quickly tested in September 1957 when Orval Famous, governor of Arkansas called in the national guard to prevent nine black students from entering Little Rocks Central High School.

Eisenhower, despite little inclination towards promoting integration, sent in federal troops to protect the students. That same year Congress passed the first Civil Rights Act since the Reconstruction. The bill, which set up a permanent Civil Rights Commission to investigate violations of civil rights authorized federal injunctions to protect voting right, proved to be extremely mild. Nonetheless, it was a step in the right direction for a Congress seemingly devoted to preserving the establishment of integration forever. As evident by the landmark civil rights ruling of the 50 s, the 1960 s movement will forever be rooted in the epochal decisions of the previous decade. Although the late 1940 s and 1950 s are usually considered fairly insignificant compared to revolutionary 1960 s, the root of the black civil rights movement lies in the effective leadership of men like Martin Luther King, Jr.

and the landmark legislation enacted by Chief Justice Earl Warren. The 1950 s provided the spark that started the civil rights fire in the heart of America.


Free research essays on topics related to: civil rights movement, luther king jr, martin luther king, comfortable middle class, separatism between blacks

Research essay sample on Martin Luther King Luther King Jr

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com