NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote
... ear old boy yelling "cowabunga" is a war cry that unleashes chaos in the classroom. "Suddenly we are faced with a little gang of ninja's trying to kick and punch each other in the face, " and when they are told to stop, the boys reply, "The turtles do it so why can't we?" This is just another example of how children apply behaviors observed on television programs to their real situations (Brady 50). The worst cartoon for children in 1997 and 1998 is probably South Park. This cartoon has many accounts of violence in it. There is violence such as derogatory language and numerous violence acts with intent to hurt someone. In fact, every show ends up with the one character, Kenny, encountering a very horrible and repulsive death.
The show, when viewed by young children, is a sure ticket for disaster. The show is about elementary children and there different adventures with each other. The children have very foul mouths and many prejudices. The cartoon is definitely not a show that should be viewed by children or even early teens. The show is more based for adults but could be confusing to children because if they see cartoons acting in a violent manner then they will think it is alright to mimic the cartoon's actions.
A 1991 study of one hundred children's cartoon programs showed that one half of the cartoons involved violence and showed three times as many acts of violence as Prime Time television (Brady 66). Mohammed Shall, (1992) a child psychiatrist at the University of Louisville claims that cartoons in the 1990 's are "a public health hazard" Shafii says that cartoons are the worst offenders for children because children can not separate reality from fantasy, and parents are not always around to explain the difference (13). Children's cartoons are becoming more like movies with violence being the main attraction. "Children are vulnerable and violence is like a Pied Piper that lures them into a darker world" (Zuckerman 13). The survey below, was done on ten cartoon shows, gives an estimated amount of violent acts on cartoons in one hour. The media's coverage of violence is also very excessive and may also have a harmful effect on children (Scully 44). Media and public affairs did a study on violence in the news media, and their research showed that violence in news reports doubled in the last year, while the overall national crime rate was unchanged.
The study also showed that murder coverage had tripled in 1993 (Scully 44). "Such excessive new coverage actually glamorized violence and give children the impression that violent behavior is acceptable (Scully 44). There are more stories in the news today about violence and crime than any other subject. Television devotes less attention to education than newspaper and magazines, which is bad because television is the most commonly used medium, of the three (Scully 44). Children Now, an advocacy group, states that "the media's coverage of children most frequently involves reports of crime and violence" (Scully 47). News reports on violence air more frequently than that is actually occurring on the streets (Stem 47). This means children are able to view more violence on television than in actual life, which makes them believe there's more violence out there.
Hillary Clinton spoke earlier this year at a conference on "children and the news media" (Scully 44). She asked journalists to provide more "balanced coverage when reporting on violence" (Stem 47). Clinton also said "good caution and prudence do not violate first amendment rights" (Stem 47). Hillary Clinton, the first lady, is trying to control television violence, she believes something must be done in order to help our children (Stem 47). A retired psychologist in Victoria, Canada, Mary Morrison, said "the screen portrays an angry, hostile world and "television is no longer reflecting the world, but the world is starting to reflect television" (Brady 50). Many things can be done to control television violence.
The first one is a computer chip that would automatically lock out programs rated "V" for violence (Scully 44). The computer chip would be produced by Zenith Consumer Electronics (Scully 44). The chip would be more expensive and it would be added to the price of the television, and would cost ten to twenty dollars more which is a small price to pay (Scully 44). The computer chip could also be included on the remote control. The parents would have to enter a password in order for shows to be blocked or added to the cable.
The only problem with the remote control is that it may be too large at first, but in time, with technology progressing forward at a fast rate, the remote control will be small enough within three to five years (Scully 44). Another way to stop television violence is the rating system which some stations have already adapted (Scully 46). The system would be the same as the movie ratings system except "V" would be used for excessive violence (Scully 46). As of right now, this system is all that parents have to control television violence. Therefore, it is up to the parents to monitor television more closely and to discuss with their children what the violence on the television means or simply to just shut the television off so they make sure that there won't be any violent content viewed. Parents have to make sure children know the difference between real violence and television violence.
The last way to control television violence is to stop advertising instruction agencies from placing commercials on during violent programming (Weir 44). This would stop television stations from running violent programs because if advertisers would pull their money the television industry would stand to lose $ 251 million dollars a year with as little decrease as 1 percent (Weir 44). With this kind of loss advertisers will not be able to run violent programming. Bibliography: Works Cited Berry, G. , & Asamen, J.
Children & Television. California: Sage Publications, Inc. 1995 Brady, D. "The Power of 'Cowabunga': Does T. V. Violence Influence Behavior?" Maclean's, 1995. 60. Fitzgerald, R. L. "It's Safer on Television. " Time Aug. 1993: 17.
Katz, L. "How TV Violence Affects Kids. " Parents' Magazine Jan. 1994: 113 McAvoy, K. "Hillary Clinton Describes Excess Violence on Television. " Broadcasting & Cable Mar. 1994: 47. Post, R. "What You do Emerges From who you are. " Direct Marketing Jan. 1994: 43 - 47. Scully, S. "V Blocker is Easy Chip Shot Away. " Broadcasting & Cable Aug. 1993: 64. Scully, S. "Anti-Violence Tools for TV. " Broadcasting & Cable May 1993: 44. Say, R. "Closing the Education Gap on TV's "Entertainment" Violence. " Education Digest Apr. 1995: 4 - 8. Stem, C. "Hillary Clinton Against Violence. " Broadcasting & Cable Mar. 1994: 47.
Weir, W. "Advertisers Hold Solution to Problem of TV Violence. " Advertising Age Aug. 1995: 14. Zuckerman, M. "The Victims of TV Violence. " U. S. News & World Report Aug. 1996: 64.
Free research essays on topics related to: television violence, violent programming, tv violence, hillary clinton, violence on television
Research essay sample on Violence On Television Hillary Clinton
