Customer center

We are a boutique essay service, not a mass production custom writing factory. Let us create a perfect paper for you today!

Example research essay topic: Capital Punishment And The Death Penalty - 1,638 words

NOTE: Free essay sample provided on this page should be used for references or sample purposes only. The sample essay is available to anyone, so any direct quoting without mentioning the source will be considered plagiarism by schools, colleges and universities that use plagiarism detection software. To get a completely brand-new, plagiarism-free essay, please use our essay writing service.
One click instant price quote

There have been over 55, 000 homicides committed in California since the death penalty was re established. This is the equivalent of killing every citizen in the towns of Carlsbad, Ca. or the town of Pensacola, Fla. There have been over 467, 000 homicides committed in the United States since the U. S. Supreme court allowed executions in 1976 up to 1994.

This relates to the fact that every hour in the United States 2. 8 people will be a victim to a homicide. If you have 4 people at your dinner table tonight it could mean that tomorrow night 3 won't be there (Internet Resource Unable to Find URL). As for the much heated argument of the penal system accidentally executing an innocent person, I must point out that in this imperfect world, citizens are required to take certain risks in exchange for relative safety. Convicted murderers have taken far more innocent lives than the supposedly 23 innocents mistakenly executed this century. For instance, released and paroled criminals murder up to 13, 000 American citizens each year.

These are the serious flaws in life sentences that abolitionists prefer to trivialize to nonexistence. Some might ask: "What if it were YOU who were to be wrongfully executed for a crime you didn't commit?" (This is where I'm supposed to be seized by paranoid terror. ) To answer that question, I would have to consider which is more important to me, my personal safety, or the common good. Common decency and ethics demand that I place the common good far above my personal safety. Therefore, I am morally obligated to take that risk.

To do otherwise would be selfish of me, not to mention cowardly. Also, the death penalty isn't the only institution that requires that we accept risks in exchange for social benefits. We, in fact, mindlessly use far more dangerous institutions that take the lives of innocents by the hundreds every day, like the three or four tons of lethal metal we call automobiles for example. After all, how can we accept the average 45, 000 person a year death toll in this nation due to car wrecks for our personal conveniences when we can't accept the few risks of wrongful executions for the sake of defending public safety? Following the lines of that logic, we not only would have to sacrifice our vehicles, we would have to sacrifice the personal conveniences of using electricity and fire because of the lives they cost by accidents. We would have to go back to living in caves like Neanderthals because of our fear of taking risks for social benefits.

Indeed, we accept and use far too many devices and institutions that kill far too many hundreds of innocents each and every day to justify focusing this much paranoia on the slimmest and unlikely of risks. To enjoy the privilege of using cars, airplanes, or any other device that improve the quality of our lives, we accept the risks and deaths that are caused by them completely in order to reap their full benefits. The same concept applies for the death penalty only on a far lesser scale. As long as we " re entitled to recklessly endanger hundreds of innocent lives daily for our personal conveniences, then surely we should be allowed to take on lesser risks for something far less selfish and self-serving like public safety. Every institution that is of great benefit to society always contains risks so that we may enjoy a better world. The death penalty happens to be the least dangerous of them, yet it is focused on with the most paranoia.

Such an attitude is completely irrational. THE DETERRENT EFFECT OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND HISTORIC PROOF One argument states that the death penalty does not deter murder. Dismissing capital punishment on that basis requires us to eliminate all prisons as well because they do not seem to be any more effective in the deterrence of crime. It is said that states that do have the death penalty have higher crime rates than those that don't, that a more severe punishment only inspires more severe crimes.

I must point out that every state in the union is different. These differences include the populations, number of cities, and yes, and the crime rates. Strongly urbanized states are more likely to have higher crime rates than states that are more rural, such as those that lack capital punishment. The states that have capital punishment have it because of their high crime rate, not the other way around. "If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims. I would much rather risk the former.

This, to me, is not a tough call. " John McAdams - Marquette University/Department of Political Science, on deterrence The incapacitation effect saves lives - that is to say, that by executing murderers you prevent them from murdering again and do, thus, save innocent life. The evidence of this is decisive and unquestionable. Additionally, the individual deterrent effect also proves that executions save innocent life. This effect represents those prospective murderers who did not murder under specific circumstances because of their fear of execution.

There are many, perhaps thousands, of such documented cases, representing many innocent lives saved by the fear of execution. Circumstances dictate that the majority of these cases will never be documented and that the number of innocent lives saved by individual deterrence will be, and has been, much greater than we will ever be able to calculate. Finally, there are more than 30 years of respected academic studies that reveal a general, or systemic, deterrent effect, meaning that there is statistical proof that executions produce fewer murders (Sharp Sec. B).

There are many examples of how the death penalty deters murder; most haven't even been listed on this paper. But here is an example of how the use of consistent executions has dramatically improved certain societies. In the 1800 s, in English occupied India, there was one of the worst gangs of murdering thieves the world has ever known, the Indian hoodlum band known as the Thuggees. Through the course of their existence, dating back to the 1550 s, the Thuggees were credited with murdering more than 2, 000, 000 people, mostly wealthy travelers. The killer secret society plagued India for more than 350 years. The Thuggees traveled in gangs, sometimes disguised as poor beggars or religious mendicants.

Sometimes they wore the garb of rich merchants to get closer to unsuspecting victims. One of their principles was never to spill blood, so they always strangled their victims. Each member was required to kill at least once a year in order to maintain membership in the cult. But they killed in the name of religion.

The deaths were conceived of as human sacrifices to Kali, the bloodthirsty Hindustani goddess of destruction. It came to pass that the Thuggees began to kill using pickaxes and knives. According to legend, the Thuggees believed that Kali devoured the bodies of their victims. The story goes that once a member of the society hid behind a tree in order to spy on the goddess. The angry goddess punished the Thuggees by making them bury their victims from then on. The ruling British government worked very hard to stop the Thuggee religion and its murderous practices.

Between 1829 and 1848, the British managed to suppress the Thuggees by means of mass arrests and speedy executions. Indeed, rows and rows of Thuggees were left hanging from the gallows along the roads by the dozens. This not only established a zero recidivism rate, but it also greatly discouraged new membership into the cult. The most lethal practitioner of the cult of Thuggee was Buhram. At his trial it was established that he had murdered 931 people between 1790 and 1840. All had been strangled with his waistcloth.

Bureau was executed in 1840. Appropriately enough, he was hanged until he strangled. In 1882, the British government deemed the problem solved with the hanging death of the last known Thuggee. Good riddance. Back then, the British weren't as morally confused as they are now. Not only had they the insight to tell the difference between crime and punishment, but they also respected their moral responsibility to defend public safety by diligently countering barbarism, even in their colonies.

If the British were anything back then like they are now, they would have been content to sit around on their hands reveling on how "civilized" they are to allow such and evil cult like the Thuggees to exist and terrorize the public. -gladly sacrificing public safety and social tranquility for some self-absorbed sense of delicacy. Most likely, the Thuggees would still be around today and for many centuries more to plague India. The Indians have a lot to be thankful for since the British eliminated that scourge over a century ago. They wouldn't have the nerve to effectively counter such barbarism these days (Roy 121 - 142). HISTORICAL TRENDS OF CAPTIAL PUNISMENT Looking at the long evolution of the death penalty one can see four consistent trends.

First is the remarkable decline in the number and types of crimes punishable by death. For a period of 150 years (until the death of George III in 1820) there were more than 200 crimes that were punishable by death (Costanzo 13). In most countries the list of capital crimes kept getting smaller and smaller until the death penalty was erased from the law of the land. Second trend is the attempt to reduce the cruelty of the executions by replacing one system with another more huma...


Free research essays on topics related to: deterrent effect, death penalty, innocent lives, capital punishment, punishable by death

Research essay sample on Capital Punishment And The Death Penalty

Writing service prices per page

  • $18.85 - in 14 days
  • $19.95 - in 3 days
  • $23.95 - within 48 hours
  • $26.95 - within 24 hours
  • $29.95 - within 12 hours
  • $34.95 - within 6 hours
  • $39.95 - within 3 hours
  • Calculate total price

Our guarantee

  • 100% money back guarantee
  • plagiarism-free authentic works
  • completely confidential service
  • timely revisions until completely satisfied
  • 24/7 customer support
  • payments protected by PayPal

Secure payment

With EssayChief you get

  • Strict plagiarism detection regulations
  • 300+ words per page
  • Times New Roman font 12 pts, double-spaced
  • FREE abstract, outline, bibliography
  • Money back guarantee for missed deadline
  • Round-the-clock customer support
  • Complete anonymity of all our clients
  • Custom essays
  • Writing service

EssayChief can handle your

  • essays, term papers
  • book and movie reports
  • Power Point presentations
  • annotated bibliographies
  • theses, dissertations
  • exam preparations
  • editing and proofreading of your texts
  • academic ghostwriting of any kind

Free essay samples

Browse essays by topic:

Stay with EssayChief! We offer 10% discount to all our return customers. Once you place your order you will receive an email with the password. You can use this password for unlimited period and you can share it with your friends!

Academic ghostwriting

About us

© 2002-2024 EssayChief.com